Russian Peasantry

Improved Essays
In The Russian Peasantry, Moon states that the peasants’ agricultural habits were based on an acute knowledge of their world. The peasants have continually been chided for resisting agricultural development whether in the form of tools, methods, or accepting new foodstuffs (like the potato) to grow. This decision, when better examined according to Moon, appears to have less to do with ignorant stubbornness and was actually based on what was reliable in Russia. The peasants simply could not afford to plant any untested crop or use new equipment for if it failed, it would force them to default on their obligations and more importantly cause famine. The old system, although archaic in other parts of the globe, was reliable in the eyes of the peasants.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stalin planned a five-year economic plan called collectivization and believed that under that plan, the USSR would industrialize, and become stronger than any nation in the West. Unfortunately, the USSR was made up mostly of poor peasants. Mostly, these peasants harvested crops using their hands and wooden plows. Therefore, to make the plan successful, he had to brings some changes in peasant way of harvesting crops and their lives. Stalin required two things from peasants: firstly, the peasants would have to pay heavy taxes to pay for his new factories and secondly, the peasants would have to produce more food for all of the new workers in the cities.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Upper Class in Animal Farm and Russia This paper will discuss the the similarities between the Upper Class of the Russian Revolution and Mollie from Animal Farm. The Upper Class or the aristocrats of Russia were made of mostly the Tsar, the Bolsheviks and the nobles. Many people were very envious of the Upper Class knowing that the Upper Class has the money to do anything they wanted (Chicago Tribune) .…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the statement “Russia’s agriculture changed little in the years 1894 to 1914”. I believe Russia’s agriculture went through little change, prior to 1905 and the Russian revolution, even though 80-90% of the peasants in Russia where farming the land, and it contributed to a huge majority of the Russian economy. But I believe post revolution, Stolypin and his reforms led to the development of Russia’s agriculture, with 1906 being a very important year in the development of Russia’s agriculture, with power taken from the Mir’s (a self-governing community) in November of 1906, and more land becoming available for farmers to buy in September 1906.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Russian Reformers Dbq

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the 19th century Russian reformers demanded the setting up of a democratically elected Constituent Assembly. At first groups like Land and Liberty used non-violent methods to gain reform but in 1879, the People's Will was formed. In January, 1880, the group contacted the Russian government and claimed they would call off the terror campaign if the Russian people were granted a constitution that provided free elections and an end to censorship. On 25th February, 1880, Alexander II announced that he was considering granting the Russian people a constitution. A year later Tsar had still not published details of his reforms and the People's Will therefore decided to carry out their threat and he was assassinated by Ignatei Grinevitski…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    attempts at famine relief were seen to be shoddy and slow” so there is uncertainty about how much aid was given to the peasantry and how quickly it was received. Nonetheless, it is clear that Alexander gave more relief than both Lenin and Stalin as the famine affected between 14,000,000 to 20,000,000 people, of which 375,000 to 400,000 died. When compared to the famine of 1921 which killed an estimated 6,000,000 and the famine of 1932 in which 6,000,000 people died within a period of seven months. Consequently, it is clear that Alexander III’s treatment of the peasantry was substantially better than that of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin's policies can be seen as the main cause of the 1921 famine as Hutchinson claims it was the “economic reforms of the…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With famine increasing tension, some blamed peasant conflicts on the idea they were naturally inferior and practiced classism, while others attributed the injustice due to the lack of education. Infertile lands, a series of famines and hunger provided further stress on the peasants, serving as the catalyst for conflict. There was a direct correlation between the severity of famines and the extent of peasant rebellions (Doc 1). Beginning in 1891 rural areas began experiencing famines, and that is the year the amount of provinces affected by rebellions jumped from approximately 2 to 10. Peter Kropotkin, a Russian anarchist, is against the government because he is growing resentful of having to provide food for the upper classes when he himself…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russian Peasants

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How far do you agree that life for peasants was uniformly bleak during the period from 1855 to 1956? By 1956, the Russian peasantry had finally been liberated by Khrushchev as he had introduced passports and finally given them identification. This was a massive step from what peasant life was like in the 1850’s – where serfdom was the most dominant form of relation between the peasants and the nobility, meaning that peasants in Russia were bound under the rules and regulations of the higher classes and their freedom of movement was restricted. It is clear, however, that for the majority of this period, living conditions for an average Russian peasant did remain somewhat austere regardless of how important Peasants were seen to be. The peasants…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Russian Revolution was a major turning point in Russian history. Destructive, dangerous, harsh, and cruel are words that characterize the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution caused major political changes in Russia. The Russian Revolution had many negative outcomes, but it also had some positive outcomes. The Russian Revolution was a failure because there was a loss of many freedoms such as press, speech, and equality.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aside from the successful unifications of Italy and Germany, many other countries were also undergoing change to become better, successful, and more dominant. Mainly, there were three countries that had experienced reforms or changes. One of these countries or nations, was the Austrian Empire. As the only lasting result of the revolution of 1848 was the emancipation, which freed the serfs; the Austrian Empire was in need of economic and social change. However, this change brought about an urban proletariat, labor unrest, and a new industrial middle class.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1969 Stalin came up with the idea of putting farmers together on large plots of land to increase the efficiency of the farming. This easy will cover the short term impact that collectivisation had on Russia socially, economically and politically to see how significant and successful collectivisation was to Russia. This will cover the short term impact on rural life, the economy and the spread of control that came over the countryside before coming to a conclusion on what collectivisation achieve in the end. This will be done using both primary and secondary sources to help give evidence to some of the claims that will be made during this essay to help prove what effect that Collectivisation has had on Russian Government and…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ju Hoansi Analysis

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There were more than 10 plus different crops being planted, tobacco was the most planted crop at camp. Farming was a challenge for them because of the need shade and they need water. With village more, permeant and not need close water sources at that time, the villager should be flexible with the water. Also, from farming, lead to the factor of herding, men did have knowledge and experience with herding cattle from working with nearby camps before globalization entered. Now they are working with their own cattle, and holding cattle for others….…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The culture of Ukraine is unique and different from each other, but among years it has been affected by its eastern and western neighbors, which is shown in its structure. The geographical conditions influenced the Ukrainian culture, curiosity of the historical procedure, as well as relations with other ethnic cultures. An important historical period in the Ukrainian culture was after independence. Ukrainian national identity exist from personal self-determination shared with others in the basis of common culture and family traditions. Ukrainian culture additionally experienced huge changes, commanded by the Eastern Standard Church and pre-Christian conventions.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In truly humiliating condition, the servants of medieval backwardness, called mujiks that things considered, could be sold together with the land or lands which were built were. Economical: Russian economy was characterized by the monopoly of land and wealth by a minority group (nobility and aristocracy ) , while most of the population was plunged in utter misery and…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Wolf describes peasants as ‘’rural cultivators whose surpluses are transferred to a dominant group of rulers that uses the surpluses both to underwrite its own standard of living and to the remainder to groups’’. There are different types of peasants: the feudal sector, independent smallholders and capitalist farmers. In the case of the feudal sector, land is owned by landlords who do not engage in cultivation but instead it is cultivated by others. Independent smallholders are peasants who own no more land than they can cultivate themselves and enough of it to make them self-sufficient. Lastly, capitalist farmers own substantial amounts of land and their farming is primarily based on the exploitation of wage labour.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays