Russia's Political Landscape Analysis

Improved Essays
Russia’s modern political landscape is as much a product of its past as it is of its present. Throughout history, Russia has undergone numerous societal and political transformations. The Eastern Slavs were and are the most significant ethnic and linguistic group of people in Russia and the surrounding countries.1 The Russian Slavs were traditionally regarded as a part of the remote eastern world and for centuries existed in isolation from Europe. During this time, an autocratic system of rule and strict control by the state became prominent, making way for Russia’s Tsarist institution.2 The first notable reform Russia experienced occurred in the late 1700s under Tsar Peter the Great who essentially westernized Russian society and through …show more content…
After the Russian Revolution that abolished the Tsarist autocracy and Stalin’s ascent to power, a civil war between Russia’s newly founded Red Army and the anti-communist White Russian group occurred. The White Russians were aided by Britain, France, and the United States further solidifying Russia’s inherent opposition yet consistent involvement with the Western world which is further demonstrated throughout the Cold War.5 The Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991 is considerably responsible for Russia’s current political upheaval. In the aftermath of the Soviet Union, Russia’s civil society proved virtually non-existent.6 As the previously communistic institutions were dismantled to make way for a more democratized regime, the Russian state faced a lack of structure and oligarchs assumed power, resulting in Russia’s present, highly regulated authoritarian …show more content…
Authoritarianism pervades the political mindset of the Russian people, creating a country with a passive majority.15 Moreover, Russia’s inert political culture is a direct result of the state’s authoritarian regime and inherited Soviet era mentality of governmental subjugation and distrust.16 The Russian state essentially failed to evolve after the collapse of the Soviet Union and as the country remains deeply rooted in the authoritarian tradition, “people are not used to democratic (participatory) behaviors, such as welcoming pluralism in thinking and behaving, tolerating dissent and supporting seemingly less efficient methods of democratic decision making. They do not easily see the advantages of debate and non-conformity and not deferring to a class of superiors.”17 Effectively, Russia’s authoritarian nation is centered on governmental security and order, and the state is supported by a political culture that provides very limited advocacy for democratic values.18 However, the Kremlin-opposition protests in 2011/2012 due to electoral fraud in the Vladimir Putin’s presidential election and continued protests in Moscow perhaps demonstrate that Russia’s political culture may be moving in a more democratized, or at least modernized, direction.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Decrees

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Peter the Great wanted “to transform his country through a process of state imposed Westernization.” He was convinced that Russia could overcome its backwardness only by adopting “the institutions, customs and attitudes of the technologically superior, wealthier and more powerful states of Western Europe.” Many were opposed to his decrees and edicts because they would “mean discarding much of Russia’s distinctive past.” Those “devoted to Russia’s unique Slavic and Orthodox Christian traditions” …” argued that abandonment of Russia’s past was too high a price to pay for Europeanization.”…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his reign as tsar, he profoundly developed Russia to meet up to the standards of the time through various means, many of which that are not discussed in this paper. He did this primarily through three different fronts: the military, government, and religion. When he passed away in 1725, Russia had the largest army of Europe, with over three hundred thousand troops. Compared to the initial state of the Russian military, which was completely elementary, the new military was one of the reasons why Russia was able to increase in world power quickly in order to compete with other European nations. To complement the rise in military, Peter the Great reformed the government of Russia as well.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter I (the Great) is a Russian Tsar and first Russian Emperor, who reigned from 1682 to 1725. At this time, the country was in decline pretty much in all social, political, economic and cultural spheres, and Russians themselves were regarded by Europeans as illiterate barbarians (Hughes 12). There also was a troublous time for the throne, causing vulnerability among the masses (Hughes 3). Coming to power, Peter brought the development and social stability, which people longed for a couple of decades. However, his methods sometimes were radical, which in combination with the fast pace of the changes that he was implementing caused massive discontent among the country’s elite as well as rigorous patriots, arguing that he wanted to make Russians…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Graham’s piece makes provocative assertions about the Russian political history and strong assertions about EU-Russia relations with minimal evidence. Graham argues that Europe’s challenge is with Russia’s political system, not President Putin. He argues that this issue started nearly 200 years ago, with the divergent political pursuit of Western Europe and Russia. He asserts that Europe’s main issue is security in the midst of a “powerful nation”.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Final Reflective Essay After reading the memoir by Lev Golinkin, A Backpack, a Bear, and Eight Crates of Vodka, I have learned that our American culture and the Russian culture are more similar than they are different. Our research project made us analyze a huge part of both our and their culture, which made us discover that both cultures have been invaded by corrupt leaders, yet there is more corruption in Russian culture. After my reading and I-Search Project I have realized that American and Russian political systems are exceedingly similar; however, that does not mean we, the citizens, react the same way.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Joseph Stalin also reduced the rights of many Russians. Many Russians also lost their lives under the rule of Joseph Stalin. In order to determine whether the Russian Revolution was a success or failure it is important that we consider numerous aspects. Based on the five texts provided Animal Farm (Chapters IX-X), by George Orwell, an excerpt from “Education, Literacy, and the Russian Revolution” by Megan Behrent, “Stalin and the Communist Party…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By 1861, Russia had been and would remain a backwards country. Russia possessed a large population and adequate land, both of which had combined to eliminate the urgent need for industrialization that had affected Western Europe. With its primarily agrarian economy and autocratic government, Russia struggled to catch up with the rest of the modernizing countries in Europe. In this historical context, Tsar Alexander II’s 1861 emancipation of all Russian serfs was a shocking first in a series of liberal reforms. However, the freeing of the serfs did not end the overarching state of rural poverty in Russia.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition in Russia opposed to Tsar Nicholas II autocratic style of before 1905 can be categorised into two main groups: Revolutionaries and Reformers (liberals). In turn the revolutionaries can be further divided into three distinct groups: Populists, Social Democrats and Social Revolutionaries. It has long been debated how much of a danger they posed to the tsardom, before 1905, which is what I shall be discussing. The Populists, who dated back to the 1870s, regarded that Russia’s future was in the hands of the Peasants.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similarly, how has legislation changed in order to accommodate or limit religion compared to the Bolshevik decrees of the early 1930s? By asking these important questions, it may be possible to gain a better understanding of how the tensions between religion and politics have shaped the reality of Russia…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty reigned in Russia from 1613 until its fall in 1917. It was the last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. The fall was prompted by the February Revolution of 1917 which lead to abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was precipitated by a number of changes in Russia, specifically changing attitudes towards the autocratic power held by the Tsar and a shift in the way many Russians viewed the Tsar himself. Many of these changes were caused by the advancement of Russia in terms of industry and the fact that Industrialisation had finally reached Russia.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Russian Empire believed they would measure up to the Western Europe states if they improved their political reforms. Thanks to Catherine II’s reforms, her achievements played a key role in the development of Russia to be seen as a modern state not only in a politics but also in a cultural sense. “In foreign affairs, Catherine was determined to continue and even exceed Peter the Great’s…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone’s opinion is valued and respected. In Russia, views are more of a consensus and single truth. The government’s view on any matter is to be passed down under the impression that decisions regarding national matters are to be made by those in power to serve the goodness of the people. Unlike in America, the Russian people…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under leadership of Vladimir Putin, The Russian Federation has undertaken actions over the past two years that can be compared to actions and ideas supported by realist theory. The fundamental property of realism is that a state believes the international system to be anarchic and will act in a “self-help system” meaning to states only act in their best interests. In such, Russia has been considered to be pursuing the interests of their own state above all else in an attempt of self-preservation. Russia’s recent activities has severely strained their relationships with previous allies in the international system by going against the norms of the system, which is another aspect of realism, believing there is no supranational authority to enforce…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, as we established importance of the topic, we can move forward to the discussion of the arguments. In Gandhi (2008), the presence of the democratic institutions mainly depends on the strength of the opposition. If the opposition 1Non-democratic phenomena in Russia include: media control and propaganda, political prisoners, legal barriers for the "non-systemic" opposition parties 1is strong enough, authoritarian governments might use political institutions to facilitate the process of negotiations with the opposition and to keep them…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays