Russ Shafer-Landau's Ethical Objectivism

Improved Essays
In Russ Shafer-Landau’s text, he discusses Ethical Objectivism, revealing that moral ethics are true simply by definition. He also addresses objections to Ethical Objectivism, one of which is J.L. Mackie’s Error Theory. The Error Theory maintains that since there are so many disagreements about ethics, there is no way to prove that moral ethics are true, and thus moral ethics cannot simply be true by definition as Shafer-Landau and his Ethical Objectivism theory claims they are. Mackie agrees with Objectivists about the “normativity” of ethics, however, he is adamant that there are no moral truths, and to support this claim, he uses the Argument from Relativity and the Argument from Strangeness. The aforementioned claim about the lack of proof

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Anthony Weston is an American Philosopher, teacher, and writer. He has written a book titled “Practical Companion to Ethics” that does discus Ethics, Religion, and Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics. Weston also discusses constructive moral dialogue. Constructive moral dialogue is concepts and ideas that makes our relationship with others easier. It allows us to get along with others that have different beliefs and concepts.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Ethics is defined as the set of moral principles or values that defines right and wrong for a person or group. Immediately, the guides are all given the responsibility of holding peoples lives. The expedition is dangerous and in order to be successful everyone must work together. However, the trip is costly and it is easy to make the decision to take peoples money without guaranteeing them safety. An example of a positive ethical decision occurred when Krakauer let the twenty climbers pass before he declined.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Harman uses the distinction between moral observation and scientific observation to show that there is a good reason to deny moral facts. Harman wonders if moral facts can be tested and confirmed the same way that scientific principles are. Harman does not believe so. Moral Error theory is characterized by the propositions that “all moral claims are false” and “we have reason to believe that all moral claims are false.” Mackie came up with the two arguments for moral error theory, the argument from relativity and the argument from queerness.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Sterba’s Subjectivism in Ethics how should we as individuals question some strong ethical questions. In the reading Sterba uses the example of gay rights. Is it okay, or is it wrong. With many people going to both sides of whether it is write or wrong. Some think that there is nothing wrong with the LGBTQ community while others are totally against it, and we think of it based on our moral judgments.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Morris does a great job of explaining the different challenges of ethics we face on a daily basis. We as a society go through life with so many obstacles to overcome, and yet society has shown us that most of the time the obstacles dictate the outcome. We read Tom’s book which gives us so many categories to help us better understand the ethical actions people take during certain situations. The first part of this chapter starts us off with the title, what are the rules now, anyway? As we read this statement alone it relates to society in such a big way.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Theory By Rachels

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In our textbook, Rachels argues that people require humility and the understanding of where they stand in the universe. He believes that we should treat people the way they deserve to be treated and that we should hope these actions are reciprocated onto us. He believes that there are multiple strategies in finding where we are in life, such as comparing one’s life to that of other’s. We must know that we are not alone in this world and that we have an obligation in taking care of others. Rachels believes that we are rewarded for our work and self-improvement, but not our luck.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. J. Ayer’s view to subjectivism is more similar to subjectivism, because he believes morals simply express feelings. What a person thinks is ethical is different to each person and is based on intuitive opinion. Something is considered right or wrong, simply because someone thinks it is. He argues that people can have contradicting views from other people. Therefore, Ayer believes that a persons’ morals or ethical judgment is neither true nor false and has no validity.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pregnancy and prenatal harm to offspring arise many issues. What is the right balance of the fetuses "rights" and the mother 's rights of bodily integrity? Finding the accommodating balance is both difficult and challenging. Both the fetus and mother must be analyzed and evaluated to come to an ultimatum deciding what is best for the unborn child, while also considering the mother 's rights to autonomy and bodily integrity. Robertson and Schulman say, "Ethical analysis must balance the mother 's interest in freedom and bodily integrity against the offspring 's interest in being born healthy.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Ideal Observer Theory is a view that concerns meta-ethics in which ethical statements are expressed propositions which can be true depending on the approval or disapproval of an Ideal Observer. There are many variations of the Ideal Observer Theory, Adam Smith and David Hume gave meaning to the Ideal Observer Theory it was Robert Firth’s article “Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer” that took it to the next level. Firth presents a different kind of analysis of ethical statements that is more modern. According to Firth, moral propositions avoid using expressions so an Ideal Observer must be congruent to an absolutist dispositional analysis. Although Firth hints that that it is not necessary for an Ideal Observer does not define who…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In chapter 4 of M. Schroeder’s Noncognitivism in Ethics, he states that noncognitivism is the successor to the ‘traditional interest theories’ which was the focus of many philosophers for many years. His notion is to explain why speaker subjectivism, an important kind of traditional interest theory faces problems and how expressivism, a noncognitivist theory solves the problems. Noncognitivist theories are motivated in two ways, they avoid ‘core questions’ of meta-ethics and/or motivated by providing a solution that is more attractive to the motivation problem. Speaker subjectivism help escape core questions of meta-ethics.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 2005 paper “Ethics and Intuitions,” Peter Singer seeks to find a new role for intuitions in moral theorizing in light of studies by Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Greene, which seem to cast doubt on the reliability of moral intuitions. These studies suggest that much of our moral reasoning is less based in rationalizing and more based in instinctual “gut” reactions, and that these instincts can be explained in terms of their evolutionary history. Further, Greene in particular demonstrates that these moral instincts can be manipulated in order to give contradicting reports, suggesting that moral intuitions are unreliable. Singer, noting how moral theorists have thus far been unable to give an account of morality without relying on moral intuitions,…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays