The Importance Of Soldiers In The Vietnam War

Improved Essays
Rules of engagement for the Unites States in the Vietnam War were a framework put into place by military authorities to define the limitations and circumstances that combat will be initiated or continue with enemy forces. (Georgia Tech College , n.d.). The rules are put into place to be compliant with international law for conducting war, minimize friendly fire accidents, and protect civilians. All of these regulations also had political motivation and each level of rank within the army from foot soldiers to the President were micromanaged under these political constraints; this paper will examine six key participants.
The field soldiers in the Vietnam War were the lowest ranking; they were expected to follow command without question. Their
…show more content…
They are “responsible for everything that happens or fails to happen in their organizations” (Holmes, n.d.), and therefore spread thinly. They prepare for missions, provide guidance to subordinates, while also implementing tough training to enforce military standards. The Battalion Commander Douglas Smith (Keeley, 1969) stated the most difficult part was “deciding when you’re going to win an engagement with the enemy and what price you’re going to pay for it”. This included wiping out villages of innocents as Vietcong took cover there, while shooting at the …show more content…
He is one who encouraged President Johnson to go into battle, agreeing it could be an easy win using traditional military force, of which the Unites States had in plentiful supply. However, as the war raged on, with no real progress being made, he had to retract his original findings, and admit his mistaken opinion “exploded into an open-ended and massive commitment of American men, money, and materiel(sic)” (Moss, 2010.p.172) He advised the President to either begin to withdraw from Vietnam or increase the amount of troops fighting there, but overall, he had begun to lose faith that winning this war was

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Careful analysis of Tim O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried” and Harold Moore’s and Joseph Galloway’s “We Were Soldiers Once… And Young” reveals two markedly different portrayals of the United States’ army during the Vietnam War. This change mirrors the dwindling optimism of the American people from Moore and Galloway’s account of the 1965 Battle of la Drang and O’Brien’s more comprehensive account of the later stages of the war and post-war period. While O’Brien, Moore, and Galloway all served extensive time in Vietnam, their portrayals of the American military differ in tone and narrative.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the book is written focussing on the volunteer soldiers. He includes how the officials felt mainly about the volunteers. How they complained that they had “no sense of their proper duty” (120). There's hardly anything ever said regarding the officers that were instructed to take on the regular soldiers. Instead, McCaffrey does include how a volunteer felt that the “‘volunteers done all the fighting’”(121)…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Vietnam War Changes

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is partly due to the army’s composition: many were professionals or volunteers - they had chosen to fight in Vietnam.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Vietnam Veterans Memorial on the National Mall is dedicated to honoring those who fought in the Vietnam War and were killed or missing in action. The memorial has three separate parts: The Three Soldiers statue, The Vietnam Women’s Memorial, and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall, which is the most popular. The Vietnam Veterans Memorial chronologically lists the names of more than 58,000 who gave their lives to serve their country. It is free to visit and open twenty-four hours a day to the community.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to Johnson’s missteps in the War, VandeMark goes on to show that the americanization of the Vietnam War was inevitable because of the political diarray in South Vietnam: “The perennial absence of stable and responsive government in Saigon troubled Washington policymakers profoundly . . . its pivotal important to the war effort and to the social and economic reforms essential to the country’s survival” (VanDeMark 364). This shows that the United States had to be involved in the War in order to provide South Vietnam with any chance of winning and preserving capitalism. Critical…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Better War examines how General Creighton Abrams’ switch from a policy of attrition to a policy of population security won the battles of Vietnam, but the incompetency of many in Congress lost the war. After General William C. Westmoreland failed to make progress in Vietnam, Abrams was promoted to replace Westmoreland. Under Abrams’ leadership, America saw many victories in Vietnam. However, all of the progress made came a little too late. Weak leadership from Westmoreland combined with a growing domestic opposition to the war forced the war to come to a close.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Memorial The Vietnam Veterans Memorial is in Washington, D.C. It includes a wall with the names of U.S soldiers who died or were missing because of the Vietnam War. Many people hoped the memorial would be a place where veterans could find closure. It was nicknamed,“The Wall That Heals”` Vietnam…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vietnam War Dbq

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Vietnam War was one of the bloodiest wars in American history resulting in the death of nearly sixty thousand American troops even though most citizens back home opposed our involvement in the war. This wasn’t always the case though, when the United States joined the war effort in 1965 most Americans supported the decision whole heartedly. Our reason for joining was to stop the spread of communism but as the war went on it seemed like this reason wasn’t good enough for many American citizens. Some reasons the American public felt this way are as follows; corruption of many high ranking government leaders, the opposing Vietcong troops were using primitive dishonorable tactics to gain an advantage over the anti communist forces and the death…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vietnam War Dbq

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twenty years and 58,286 deaths later, the Vietnam War went down as one of the most significant in United States history. (Source A) The war is more historically remembered as the Indochina War to Americans due to its location and its unforeseeable loss to North Vietnam. Although the United States was just an ally of South Vietnam with hopes to stop the spread of communism, they ended up being the largest foreign military presence which lead to Vietnam schooling labeling it as the American War. Having only been there for three years but still being a contributor to the outcome, the United States was handed their first loss in war.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dbq Vietnam War

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is argued that American involvement in the Vietnam War is not justifiable; they were engaged in the wrong war, at the wrong time in the wrong place. I consider this assessment to be fair and the arguments of Carl N. Degler, Jon Roper and Nigel Cawthrone and others will be discussed in support of this argument. This essay will also elaborate on why I understand this assessment to be fair together with reasons why the involvement of the Americans in the Vietnam War was unjustifiable. America’s motive for involvement was to halt and prevent the spread of communism and a containment strategy and foreign policy called the National Security Council Report 68, NSC-68 for short, was implemented to do so. Roper explains the introduction to a book…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For his skilled work, McMaster received the New York Military Affairs Symposium’s 1997 Award for Outstanding Book on Military History. As the subtitle suggests, the focus of the book revolves around President Johnson, Secretary of Defense McNamara, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). Contrary to popular belief that the United States was drawn into the war to contain the spread of communism, McMaster argues that the Americanization of Vietnam was the result of Johnson’s insecurity, McNamara’s flawed plan of ‘graduated pressure’, and the JCS’s failure to challenge the strategy and provide sound military…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vietnam War Dbq

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Payton Diaz One of the most controversial wars in the history of the United States is the Vietnam War. The war was originally between North and South Vietnam. But the United States soon got involved to stop the spread of communism to South Vietnam. In the beginning, people supported the war, Americans believed the United States was doing a good thing by aiding the anti-communists in South Vietnam. But as the war went on, issues like draft dodging, the misleading of the public, and an increase in deaths, both military and civilian, began to change people's viewpoint on the war.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logevall claims that committing to war in Vietnam was a terrible mistake. Logevall begins by showing some sympathy to President Lyndon Johnson and other leaders at the time, as they believed that the strategies they had would work. He then goes on to state that “vocal proponents of taking the war to North Vietnam were strikingly few in number”4. He states this to show the overwhelming rejection of support to go to Vietnam by many American leaders of the time, other than Johnson. Logevall also suggests that even other countries were skeptical of being able to win in a long-term battle with the Viet Cong.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 9, 2001, the United States of America was hit with a devastating blow. The Twin Towers were taken down on October 7, 2001, less than a month later. However, was this war necessary? Bush stated “that this was a multinational effort as proof that America, in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, was “supported by the collective will of the world.” […] He vowed to continue to take what he called the “war on terror” to those countries that sponsored, harbored or trained terrorists” (History.com Staff).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the assassination of Kennedy, Johnson had taken over and became even more invested in the war. He continued to send aid in the form of military troops and even made the statement that he would not be the president who would lose the Vietnam war (Moss, 2010). Following the Tet Offensive, Johnson decided to drop out of the running for Presidency. It was president Nixon who then followed and eventually was able to withdrawal troops from Vietnam giving him what he called “peace with honor” (DeVry, 2014). Although all of the presidents were very much different, they all had one thing in common, none of them wanted to admit defeat.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays