Rousseau's Discussion Of Inequality In Society

Superior Essays
A popular point of discussion is equality in society because it appears in the everyday life of all individuals. However, it is a difficult point of discussion because there are many factors that play into it. In fact, private property plays a very important key role in the discussion of equality. This is because private property involves both material and monetary items, and these are resources that are fought over on the daily when it comes to equal or fair distribution of wealth. A key question brought up by this is not only what counts as property, but whether or not it is a valuable concept that should be maintained or destroyed in regards to if it suits society’s needs. The opinions on this topic are vast and endless, but there is one …show more content…
“Rousseau points out that right does not equal might” ("Rousseau's Views on Property as Presented in The Social Contract”). This explains the introduction of wealth because it was brought into the matter to manage resources and to provide a means to acquiring it. In some ways, Rousseau believes that wealth is an included factor in private property. With that being said, it is arguable whether or not private property is natural or a human invention since it varies depending on the details of the subject under discussion. Wealth is one of the aspects of private property that truly brings up Rousseau’s belief that private property undermines equality in society. This is because there is not an equal distribution of wealth, and thus an unequal distribution of private …show more content…
Depending on the focus, private property can be viewed as natural or unnatural, and this idea is what shapes the effects seen on equality in society. Rousseau, among many philosophers, believes that private property is an unnatural concept that hinders equality in society. Opinions may vary but it may actually be an adhesive building block for society in and of itself because it is found in nature and allows for sufficient resource management. There is much controversy surrounding its impact on equality, but not even in nature is equality present. The real argument to be broached is not what private property does to impact equality, but whether or not equality itself is capable in a functional

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the readings of “Equal Respect & Equal Shares,” David Schmidtz displays various arguments against equal shares as a principle of justice. Notably he is highly stringent in the case of equal shares as a principle of justice when contrasting with the principle of first possession. I will argue that many of the objections have been leveled against the act of first possession in light of equality as well as respect. I will focus on Schmidtz discussion of the benefits of first possession and the rewards reaped through the accruing of assets through the principle of first possession and note some clarifications that are needed in order to identify who happens to be benefiting the most in light of such a principle .Schmidtz…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That “every man has a property in his own person” is a widely accepted premise of John Locke’s property argument. The limits of that premise were on trial in Moore v. Regents of the University of California, in which John Moore sued the University of California (“UC”) after its doctors, under the guise of treating him for hairy-cell leukemia, collected Moore’s cells, patented a cell line from those cells, and earned hundreds of thousands of dollars by doing so. In the suit, Moore claimed, inter alia, “that he continued to own his cells following their removal from his body” and that he therefore had “a proprietary interest in each of the products that [UC] might ever create from his cells or the patented cell line.” The key question presented…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx’s view of private property is significantly differently than what we view as private property today. He believed that private property was ownership of productive property. This is property that is producing a profit for the owner. Marx felt that government should control property and that all should share in the work and reward of the property. Whereas men like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson believed that ownership of property was for important for a good government.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau explains how a reset button is needed for politics at his time because the natural state of man has been compromised by the self-indulgence and dependent nature of politics. After man had strayed from the set of rules laid down by god/nature he was no longer self-sufficient and free but was enslaved by manmade laws that enforced inequality. Rousseau criticizes the idea of property “The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying 'this is mine ', and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society” (Rousseau). In this statement Rousseau claims that the idea of property is one of the origins of inequality, as man claimed the land as his own and began exploiting nature. Rousseau’s call for a reset button on political ethics is at a disagreement with Machiavelli’s idea, where Machiavelli urges the Prince to recognize and utilize the lapses in human nature.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The specific thoughts of Rousseau and Mill on freedom, the significance of social contracts, individual versus social freedom, and government’s role…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early modern writers as diverse as John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government and Karl Marx in Capital attribute inequality to the social dominance of one force such that it eclipses other forces’ abilities to function as they might otherwise; a ‘domination disrupts nature’ thesis. Both Locke and Marx identify money as one such dominating force. This dominance applies not only to money being the end of transaction, but also to the dominance of the means of transaction, with corresponding ramifications for the items being transacted. For example, Locke notes how the accumulation of wealth allows people to store more than they require, leaving relative deprivation in times of scarcity.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx examine the social change that nations go through either as a result of democracy diminishing Aristocratic ages or because of the wide spread of industrial capitalism. However, Marx and Tocqueville observe the impact of these social changes on the community differently. Marx writings are about how the European world was changing during his lifespan. He observes how the beginning of the Industrial Revolution creates an increase in the level of economic production, but also an immense increase of inequality in a society. On the contrary, Tocqueville analyzes the relationship between equality and liberty during the democratic ages vs. the aristocratic ages.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, various forms of government exist across the world as remnants and variations of the original ideals developed years ago by historic philosophers like John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and James Harrington. Philosophers have played a substantial role in the development of law and government over the course of history in roughly every civilization and they basically served as innovators in the field of moral principles, ethics, and human rights. One of the larger political innovations of the past that heavily affects the America 's today was based upon original ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau, a famous French politic and philosopher of the 1700s during the French Revolution, was an individual who believed in the development of a government…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Rousseau and Mill on Liberty In this essay, I would like to contrast and compare the concept of liberty in Jean Jacques Rousseau's “the Social Contract Theory”, which was written in 1762 and J.S. Mill's On liberty, which was written in 1859. In a fact, the authors were born different century and also, had different ideas. They were successfully influence the society by sharing their ideas. In the writings, both Rousseau and Mill mainly discourses about the relationship between authority and one's liberty. First, I would like to examine both Rousseau's and Mill's schemas and then compare their thoughts.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays