Montesquieu's The Spirit Of The Law

Good Essays
The French revolution started because the citizens wanted more freedoms and rights. The idea of the new government came from the Enlightenment philosophers. Locke was one of the many he rejected monarchy also he believed that government should be selected by and follow the will of the majority, which was a fundamental assertion of the Revolution. Montesquieu introduced the idea of separation of powers in government (from The Spirit of the Law). Where Montesquieu had understood freedom as being unconstrained and unimpeded in doing what one chooses to do so long as it is lawful, Rousseau defined freedom as ruling oneself, living only under a law which one has oneself enacted In Rousseau 's conception of a constitution, the nation became sovereign over itself. …show more content…
Freedom, both personal and political, is self-rule: being obedient only to rules made by all citizens for the benefit of all citizens. Such freedom, expressed negatively, is one of not being subject to the will of others and not being subject to one 's selfish passions. Equality is the right of each citizen to participate in politics as a moral agent, that is, to have self-rule utilizing the general will. The American revolution was pretty much the same to the French, but it way less tries to get it to work the. The American bill of right is built on the ideas of most of the enlightenment philosophers. The founding fathers took the ideas and molded them into a government that worked, and they did a good job if it 's still working today so you 'll have to thank Locke who gave the idea for everyone should have a vote. Montesquieu can be credited to the multiple and complex American government with all the branches and checks and balances. We also have Wollstonecraft, which said that women should have rights and be just as equal as men, but that didn 't come into reality in until the early

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Freedom is a concept that cannot be mutually defined by all. This is because of the various aspects that impact one perception on what freedom is and how it should be achieved. Through the text Introduction to Social and Political Society by Omid Payrow Shabani and Monique Deveaux, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill provide their unique philosophies on the concept on freedom and liberty. Kant stands behind positive liberty and advocates that the government can act as an institutionalized version of the best parts of ourselves meaning that freedom does not mean an absence of government but one that helps everyone become more reasonable. Mill, on the other hand, supports negative freedom and believes that the state should only intervene when…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke believed in a limited, representative government while Rousseau believed in a direct form of government by the people. Locke believed that the powers of the government are to be limited. He believed the government should only exist to protect life, liberty, and property and if the government were to overstep that authority, then the public would have a right to overthrow the government. As I said before, Thomas Jefferson paid homage to these ideals during his drafting of the Declaration of Independence. Along with separation of powers between the House of Commons and House of Lords,2 Locke’s ideals greatly influenced American government where power is vested in a bicameral legislature along with an executive and judicial branch.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He inspired citizens to demand for more rights so that it would increase their individual power while it decreased the monarch’s power over the citizens and government. In America, colonists noticed that the French broke away from old styles of government because of the influence of the new Enlightenment ideas and Rousseau’s influence. The ideas also inspired them to seek more individual rights, as well as demand freedom from England. Although monarchs opposed Rousseau’s ideas, imprisoned him, and banned The Social Contract, he remained devoted to arguing for the social and individual freedoms that citizens continued to practice in modern day France and…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The enlightenment ideas of John Locke also created civil unrest with the idea of a king. Locke argued that in order for a government to be legitimate that it had to have the consent of the people it would rule. The main way he…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While some would agree that all are free, others would believe democracy allows no freedom. Authors such as Smith, Marx, Tocqueville, and Dewey all have contributed their form of a reliable government and have paved the road for our government today. Adam Smith believed we have the freedom to create a living for ourselves within…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Political culture is a set of beliefs, values, and attitudes that define and provide a structure and foundation for a political system. Even though, all Americans don’t share the same views, the sweeping majority support the ideas of liberty, equality, democracy, individualism, unity, and all-around diversity. Liberty for Americans is the freedom for people to do what they want; however, they want, if it doesn’t impose on the freedom of others. Although, equality in America hasn’t always been provided to all races and genders, today it’s a pillar of our society. All Americans have the same fundamental rights.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The people had no concept of rights; however, under the law the people perceived as equal. Therefore, by Rousseau providing a definitive description of what government should be, prompted the Third Estate representatives to include this contemporary idea, government is for the people, protects the rights of the people and the citizens themselves limited the power of the government. The reign of absolute monarchy conceived a negative atmosphere in France. However, the philosophies of the Enlightenment period administered an initiation of change. Furthermore, led to significant legislative change, which introduced the concept of people no longer the subjects of the king but as citizens protected by the…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, Rousseau’s Social Contract (1762) described an alternative to the old regime. Rousseau supported the French Revolution because he believed that a state was only legitimate if it was directed by the “general will” of its citizens. While the principles of both philosophes diverged when analysing the basis of the absence of enlightenment, Rousseau and Kant both perceived the French Revolution to be necessary in achieving the age of…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch. This would give the government the ability to do whatever they felt was necessary. Hobbes sees the government as a way of restraining the naturally selfish natures people possess so that they can live and work together in society. This is quite the opposite view of Locke. Locke promotes more of an optimistic viewpoint arguing that the best form of government is a democracy.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to inform other nations on why the colonies desired to separate themselves from the tyranny of Great Britain. Also, the document was written for the purpose of gaining support from the other nations to join the fight for America’s freedom. “Jefferson believed in a "wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another but which otherwise left them free to regulate their own affairs.” (millcenter.org) Therefore, a government that did more than preserve the lives of its citizens was a government that interfered with a person’s freedom. A person having the authority to control the daily activities of his life is a person that is considered to have freedom. Governments are to be put in place to protect a person’s rights and freedom not to destroy and conquer.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays