In 1966, Tom Stoppard debuted his play, adapted from the Shakespeare classic Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Within the play, the protagonists, who play minor characters in Hamlet, resurface as major characters with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are often deeply confused about their roles, motives and even their existence as they remain unaware that they are actors within Hamlet. They wander throughout the Hamlet storyline appearing mostly as observers to the play, rather than actually taking an active role. Within Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Stoppard utilizes the existence of a play within a play, acting as a fixed force upon the player's actions and motives to question the existence of a …show more content…
The structure of Hamlet and their natural roles as subjects to a King, cause Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to follow a path set for them by Shakespeare and the King of Denmark. As characters who appear to take a passive role within the play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, have no choice in the decisions that they make because the script decides their next actions and thoughts. After being given their mission of improving Hamlet’s mood, Guildenstern says to an agitated Rosencrantz, “But we are comparatively fortunate; we might have been left to sift the whole field of human nomenclature, like two blind men looting a bazaar for their own portraits…. At least we are presented with alternatives.” (Stoppard, 39) Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s fate’s are up to chance and because they have no way of influencing or changing their fate’s, they can only make the best of the situation that they are given, as they are victims of