Rosenberger V. University Of Virginia Case Study

Improved Essays
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia was a case that focused on wanting eligible funding for student religious publications. Although, the university provided funding for other organizations, the student religious organization for publication did not meet the criteria, according to the University of Virginia.
Facts
The University of Virginia has several organizations on its campus that allows publications to be printed according to their specific requirements. There was one particular organization at the University of Virginia that created a Christian magazine Wide Awake founded by Ronald Rosenberger, that did not get this opportunity. This intended publication was deemed not eligible to get printed, due to this religious organization being one of the University of Virginia’s non-registered student organizations that exclude religious, philanthropic and political activities, along with activities that would jeopardize their tax-exempt status, or involve payment of honoraria, social, or entertainment-related expenses (Skelton, 2015). In fact, Justice Kennedy delivered, that the University withheld authorization for payments on behalf of petitioners for the sole reason that their student paper “primarily promotes or manifests a particular belief in or about a deity or an ultimate reality” (Find Law, 2015) was the reason why it was denied the funding for publication. Another fact about this case is that Wide Awake editors and Rosenberger filed lawsuit three times to get justification on why their publication was not eligible for funding, as these are some facts that lead to the major issues of this case. Major Issues A major issue concerning this case is the refusal to publish a magazine that is within its limits of subjects to be discussed. The University of Virginia does not exclude religion as a subject matter, as there are organizations, majors, and courses that relates to religion at this educational institute. However, the University disfavors student journalistic efforts with religious editorial viewpoints, while knowing religion is a vast area of inquiry, providing a specific premise, a perspective, a standpoint from which a variety of subjects may be discussed and considered (Skelton, 2015) is a major issue as to why this magazine was not published. The magazine’s content focused on multicultural backgrounds, philosophical content, and religious content. This type of content not funded by the Student Activities Fund was the major issue why the University did not fund Wide Awake publication, due to it containing these viewpoints. Overall, the issue for non-publishing was based
…show more content…
The organization behind this magazine wanted to give interested students at the University of Virginia a Christian viewpoint on various topics. This book was not developed to change one’s religious views, only to provide the unifying focus for Christians of multicultural backgrounds (Skelton, 2015). However, the University’s Dean of students did not view this magazine in that way. This is what led to the court cases filed by Ronald Rosenberger, the founder of the student religious magazine. The holding for this case was that the University of Virginia denied funds available to a publication produced from a religious viewpoint, however, not to other student publications, which violate the First Amendment’s freedom of speech. However, the University of Virginia did not want to violate the Establishment Clause, but it is stated, if a university uses tuition money to support secular groups, it must use some of those funds to support religious groups (Skelton,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case of Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes (1984) was a class action lawsuit in which M. Stern and the patients of Sibley Memorial Hospital sued the Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses and Missionaries, five financial institutions, and five members of Sibley Memorial Hospital’s Board of Trustees. Plaintiffs alleged the defendants conspired to monetarily benefit from the financial management of the hospital through use of the financial institutions to which they were affiliated. Plaintiffs also alleged breach of fiduciary duty by trustees. During this case the plaintiffs attempted to establish the conspiracy they had alleged by presenting specific incidences to which questionable financial activity occurred.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Congress established a federal Bank of the United States through a legislative act. The federal Bank had created a branch for operation in the state of Maryland. According to Maryland laws, any bank within Maryland without a state charter will be imposed a tax by the Maryland state government, and the branch of the Bank of the United States is one of the non-chartered banks. McCullough, a cashier for the Second Bank of the United States, was operating in Maryland and issued banknotes without paying the tax. The State of Maryland sued McCullough for not paying the tax in an argument that the Bank was unconstitutional due to the lack of specification of the power to create a bank in the Constitution .…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment protects the freedom of religion. Everybody and every group have their right to practice their religion. However, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources denied Trinity to receive the Playground Scrap Tire Surface Material Grants because Trinity is a religious organization. The NDR discriminated Trinity based on it religious status and violated the Free Exercise Clause. Trinity has the same opportunity as other organizations to get the grants.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The identification of several significant facts in the case of Tennessee v. Garner calls into question the use of deadly force in the “unattempted” apprehension of an unarmed suspect. The first such fact is the admission and later verification by Hymon that Garner was unarmed. A second fact is that the suspect was fleeing in the opposite direction (away) from Officer Hymon and in a position as not to cause the officer to be in fear for his life. Additionally, Officer Hymon with the aid of his flashlight was able to observe that the suspect was a minor and of slender statue (observing his hands and face) posing no threat to him or others.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Trinity Lutheran Church petitioned for the grant to be reconsidered. Trinity Lutheran is not claiming any entitlement to a subsidy. The claim was, it is not the money that counts it is the purpose behind it. The Free Exercise Clause protects against indirect coercion or penalties on the free exercise of religion not just outright…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette case that was argued from March 11,1943, to a decision made June 14,1943. The case was filed when a member of Jehovah's Witness, Walter Barnette, was opposed to children in public schools being forced to salute the flag at activities. Barnette had fought other cases for his religion that didn’t like saluting symbols. Since children caught not saluting were expelled or charged as a delinquent, Barnette said that making kids salute the flag was unconstitutional, violating the first amendment.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lemon Vs Kurtzman

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kurtzman’s argument was that the states were not funding religious practices and that the state was only giving money to help education. He contested that in no way did the acts support religious practice because of the provisions in each statute that specifically said the purchased textbooks had to be secular as well as the teachers that received supplements had to be teaching secular subjects such as math or English.(cite) My opinion of the case is that the framers of the U.S. Constitution explicitly state that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there-of” (cite) so therefore it is completely unconstitutional for these two states to pass laws that are obviously trying to advance the religious school system. I also believe that even though the states placed provisions in the statutes to attempt to make them seem secular based they still crossed the line of entanglement by getting too involved in the supplements and purchasing of textbooks from these…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Entanglement must be excessive before it runs afoul of the Establishment Clause. Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997). States and Federal government are prohibited from imposing a special occupation tax exclusively on those who devote their days to spreading religious messages. Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 (1989). The principle that government may accommodate the free exercise of religion does not supersede the fundermental limitations imposed by the Establishment Clause.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one religion, along with…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years people have been overusing the First Amendment as source of defense. Since the first amendment entitles people the freedom of speech, people like to use it as an excuse to express their emotions about a certain situation knowing that the first amendment protects them. Therefore, they take less responsibility for their actions and blame the constitution for their slip-ups. In Free-Speech Follies by Stanley Fish, Fish addresses the First Amendment issue. Fish states that people use the First Amendment to excuse themselves from the criticism that their actions have cause.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This law did not provide money to any of the schools or support their religion directly. It assisted various parents to get their children safely to school, which did not violate the First Amendment (Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Opening Paragraph, Thesis Statement: Public schools are put in place to educate students not interrogate them with religious acts that aren’t chosen upon them individually, the judicial outlook of the matter is the courts find that the allowance of prayers being set upon in schools is inappropriate and unconstitutional, the presidential outlook from (Murray v. Curlett) explains that students coming into school shouldn’t start the day with a prayer and should have neutrality, the executive’s feel that the practice of religions in schools singles out the kids who don’t participate in religions at home and should be rethought altogether. All in all religious acts may have been seen as common for some time but now a days it is not okay for…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Provisional Title “In God We Trust: Freedom Religion in Public Schools” This title was chosen to examine and understand the extent in which teachers and students can express their beliefs, and the extent to which schools allow religion to be tolerated. I chose the title “In God We Trust” because it is the official motto of the United States, yet it directly correlate’s with the controversy of separation of church and state. As an American citizen we have the right to freedom of religion, but the constitution is vague in what extent freedom of religion is acceptable.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. From the perspective of a college or university, is there a difference between internal law and external law? What are the kinds of sources of law of each kind? Discuss.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays