Roper Vs Simmons Essay

Improved Essays
There is no doubt that the two separate cases of Roper v. Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma the act of murder was committed by minors who were tried, convicted, and deserving of a fitting punishment. However, in this analogy between the primary and secondary analogue, the argument of Roper v. Simmons is if a minor under the age of 18 should be sentenced to Capital Punishment, and if doing so is a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma, “that executing persons for crimes committed at age 15 or younger constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment” (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). In part, because Oklahoma’s death penalty statute set no minimum age limit in which he or she would be sentenced to death (Flaherty, 2002). The intent behind the death penalty is to one deter acts where he or she would be sentenced to death and two to punish the convicted criminal. Ultimately, the lower Missouri Supreme Court sided with Roper and ruled that …show more content…
Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma is where two minors are sentenced to the death penalty. A case is argued that capital punishment of a minor is a form of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005).
Number of Similarities
The Simmons and Thompson were minors that committed heinous murderous acts. Both were tried and convicted as adults in a court of law and as a result, both were sentenced to the death penalty. Both cases address the issue of culpability of a minor and the extenuating circumstance of their lives that brought them to a place in their life where they would commit such crimes such “victims of abuse or other noxious influences” (Flaherty, 2002). In addition, both cases set a precedence that other courts will follow in similar court cases.
Nature and Degree of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile crime is overwhelming throughout the country and most states have enacted laws allowing convicted juveniles to be tried as an adult and sentenced to death for serious crimes. This case addresses the issue of whether sentencing a youth to death for a crime he or she committed during the age of sixteen and seventeen is cruel and unusual punishment in violation On evening of January 7, 1981, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, Kevin Stanford, age 17 years and 4 months committed the murder of Barbel Poore. Stanford along with his accomplice constantly raped and sodomized Poore during and after their commission of a robbery at Checkers gasoline station located on Can Run Road. Afterwards Poore was driven to a secluded area where…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmons, I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of Simmons. I believe that Simmons deserves the death penalty, there was no reason in Simmons’ claims and agreement about how the execution of minors violate the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Yet, the defendant premeditated the crime and did not consider the victims’ life. The defendant enters into the victim’s home, robbed the victim, then tied up the victim and threw the victim off a bridge. In addition, the defendant stated that he assured that he would get away with the crime because he was minor.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every generation comes with its challenges. Linda J. Collier addresses a sympathetic and concerned audience as she uncovers an issue long swept under the rug: punishments of juveniles who commit adult crimes, such as murder, rape, etcetera. As a former university attorney and court appointed guardian for juveniles in legal trouble, she has firsthand knowledge of the ineffectiveness of the juvenile court system. While her use of thought provoking examples creates a strong argument, she fails to convince me that juveniles who commit serious crimes deserve to serve adult punishments. Collier begins her argument by recounting the incident of Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden, who had led a massacre in Jonesboro, Arkansas.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gary Graham Case Study

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over three centuries later, the Supreme Court established 16 as the very minimum age for an offender to be sentenced to death. Despite the courts recognition of the constitutionality of the practice,…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kentucky as the basis for sentencing juveniles to death for murder. Prior to Roper v. Simmons Courts could issue juveniles under 18 but older than 15 death sentences for murder ("Juveniles and the Death Penalty," n.a., p. 1). Roper v. Simmons overruled Standard v. Kentucky thus making the sentencing anyone under the age of 18 when the crime was committed unconstitutional. In my opinion, in a case like Simmons, adult court is where the trial and sentencing needed to be held.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile delinquents are being incarcerated and given the same punishment as adults are given, there are different factors to why this is a continuous problem. Recidivism rates, the mental capacity of juveniles, and the rights a juvenile hold are reason to why this is a problem. In the Atkins v Virginia case, the supreme court ruled the mentally retarded being sentenced the death penalty as unconstitutional and cruel and unusual punishment, under the eight amendment. In correlation to the Atkins v Virginia case, is the Roper v Simmons case. The Roper v Simmons case ruled the death penalty for juveniles as cruel and unusual punishment because a child under eighteen years old is not mentally developed yet, therefor they fall under the same consideration…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The utmost significant youthful offender case was Roper v. Simmons. The basis for this statement is for the reason that prior to this incident, the United States of America, which allegedly was or is the most compassionate country that defends human rights, was the only Westernized nation that still had the death penalty for young offenders. The U.S. continued this death penalty procedure in spite of all the technical proof that they had on the subject of how juveniles are not comparable to fully-grown criminals because of their immature minds, which makes them do something on impulse short of thinking of the possible costs of their activities. As a result, the United States of America was comparable to other countries such as Iran or other countries that it branded as ethically broke in concern to executing youthful offenders before this judgement. The United States was in fact still delivering out death punishments for youthful offenders in the twenty first century.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles as young as 14 are being positioned in prisons with adults from minimum to maximum prisons. A minimum prison would house offenders who have committed a minor offense such as theft, while a maximum prison house felonies who have engaged in activities such as rape or murder. In 2005, the Supreme Court banned the death penalty ruling “people under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change (Scott, 2012).” Although, the court recognizes juveniles are immature, irresponsible, and susceptible to peer-pressure yet juveniles remain housed with adults. “For instance, several studies have reported a greater probability of recidivism for juveniles processed in the adult justice system compared with…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Equity Framework

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Lamentably, handguns are a gigantic factor in adolescent brutality these days. A different equity framework was set up, for minors that perpetuate wrongdoing years prior. The legal framework was executed, with the expectation of keeping adolescents that perpetuate wrongdoing from enduring harder disciplines as grown-ups and to help restore them exclusively on the young equity framework. Be that as it may, with the ascent in rough wrongdoings by youth a few courts are currently giving adolescents harsher condemning and furthermore putting incredible worry on the well-being of people in general. In either case, the preeminent court of the U. S. decided that death penalty for a person that had conferred an offense that was less than 18 years old was merciless and strange discipline and was likewise taboo by the Constitution.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Routledge, doi:10.1080/07418820701294805 Langemo, Bree. “Serious Consequences for Serious Juvenile Offenders: Do Juveniles Belong in Adult Court?” Ohio Northern University Law Review, vol. 19, no. 30, 2004, http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/api/version1/getDocCui?lni=4CC1-J0G0-00CW-4018&csi=140724&hl=t&hv=t&hnsd=f&hns=t&hgn=t&oc=00240&perma=true. Levitt, Lacey.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article raises the issue of whether young murder suspects should be tried as adults, as a result of cases in Massachusetts and how the State is going to handle the issue following the United States Supreme Court ruling that an Alabama law that gave juveniles convicted of murder mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole was unconstitutional. Massachusetts law had anyone 14 years or older accused of murder be tried as an adult, the article at the time debated the next move the State’s Judicial Court will make. DISCUSSION While the article focuses on severe crime by juveniles, it sparks the broader debate as to whether juveniles should be tried in adult courts at all. This issue is important to me because our criminal justice system clearly distinguishes between adults and juveniles and has made juveniles court system different from adult court.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays