Tribunus Plebis Analysis

Improved Essays
In 285 B.C. (Mark, “Roman Empire”), Rome had one of the largest empires in the world at this time and in history. In fact they controlled and conquered lands formerly know as Britannia, Hispania, Achaea, Judea, and the North African coast (Trueman, “The Roman Empire”). Therefore to of conquered such huge areas and take control of these people, they would of had to have great officials and armies to lead, but even to control the people of Rome itself. This is why the government created several military branches with their own leaders that were placed in charge of certain things, places, and people. Such as a Roman tribune, who were considered highly ranked in the military and had authority over the people of Rome. A Roman tribunes main focus …show more content…
The tribunus plebis were set up in place to protect the rights and laws of the plebeians(Lindering, “Tribune”). At this time they were allowed to refuse orders from the counsel, the praetors who were the administrative of justice(Lindering, “Praetors”), and the quators who controlled their money(Lindering,”Quators”). They were also at the top of them, which meant they took over the election that was in charge of picking the person who was in control of the games and temples ,but also were responsible for helping the poorest of the plebeians. As time passed they were allowed more authority in having the right to call a senate meeting into order, or arrest officials such as lawmakers in the system(Lindering, …show more content…
It starts out with the two walking around until they stumble upon two men, a cobbler and carpenter just roaming around not in their work clothes. This is was strange because it was a work day and not just them, but everyone wasn 't working. So they start to question these two in which one of these are being difficult and won 't tell what he is, which is getting Murellus mad. Until Flavius ask again why they aren 't in their shops, and one replies because they are celebrating Caesar 's triumph over Pompey. Immediately Murellus is heated because the people of Rome are acting two faced and they aren 't acting loyal. He even goes on to say the people should be punished because of the way they are acting because they are showing no gratitude or respect towards Pompey. The man who did numerous of things for them and they were just cheering for him, now they are acting like they don 't even care if he is dead. Still upset he says to Flavius if there are any of Caesar 's statues with any sign of decorations they will go around and take all of down because he doesn 't believe that Caesar should be looked up as a good guy. They both see and compare Caesar to a bird that needs its feathers plucked, so he won 't get too high because already he is seen as someone who is cocky and full of himself. This is scene that just took place is important because it is showing the characteristics and true

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Empire is renowned for being one of the greatest empire of the ancient world. The military played a crucial role on making Rome’s glory withstand the test of time. In addition, it was a significant aspect of Ancient Roman society as it shaped the Roman Empire and the Western civilisation. This is due to Rome’s military potential to campaign a wide-scale war with its neighbouring nations resulting to form the Roman Empire. The military was regarded important as it influenced all the territory under the Roman rule to conform to Rome’s way of life and culture. As a result, it secured peace and order throughout the Empire. However, due to the military extensive campaigning, it led to hyperinflation and eventually the inevitable downfall of the Roman Empire.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Government Structure

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ancient Roman government structure is something that was unique to civilizations at this time. The Romans were trying to be different and better than the civilizations that had come before them. The book Rome, the Greek World, and the East: Government, Society, and Culture in the Roman Empire examines the differences between the Romans to the other successful civilizations that had come before them. This provides a good insight into why the Roman model was considered special and unique from the rest of the world. It also theorizes on what the Romans wished to embody as they structured their empire. In the book, The Construction of Authority in Ancient Rome and Byzantium: The Rhetoric of Empire by Sarolta Takacs, the author examines how…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Originally, the Roman Empire only had control of area inside of present day Italy and Sicily. The empire would expand greatly as the years went on. Unlike the Mesopotamians, Rome did not have to suffer the change of empires, making it relatively easier to spread their empire. Out of the history of Rome’s influential emperors, one of the most successful would be Julius Caesar. During his reign, the Roman empire expanded greatly, pushing its borders from only Italy and Spain to Gaul, Northern Africa, and Anatolia. These successes were only made possible by Rome’s superior system of roads, military training, and economy. All of these factors went into creating the Empire, one of most powerful forces of all time. A great Roman author, Virgil once wrote in his book The Aeneid, “Roman, remember that you shall rule the nations by your authority, for this is to be your skill, to make peace the custom, to spare the conquered, and to wage war until the haughty are brought low.” This quote best sums up Rome at the height of its power. Being one of the most influential empires in the world, Rome had expanded greatly, having control over many places. This power and authority did, however, have its downsides. Ironically, the factor that put Rome on the world stage also took them off of it. The empire was so thinly spread, it was hard to control every…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rome did something in government that nations before them never really successfully accomplished; they became a republic. This unified state of the Roman Empire was much more efficient than the competing powers of other divided empires. “The Roman Republic inherited Greek ideas of territorial sovereignty and popular government.” (Reilly 145). The new republic that Rome formed would allow them to live in peace amongst themselves for centuries. Rome had elections for the people of this republic so that they could pick two consuls who for one year controlled the military, and ten tribunes who would represent the people in the government. In times of political distress the Roman people would pick one dictator to rule over the empire until everything was back to order. The rules and laws that the tribunes established were used to govern the territories. The cities of these territories would post the rules up in their town forum where all citizens of the cities could see it. One primary source that helps show the efficiency of the Roman Empire is a series of “rules incised on ten plates of bronze for public display in the town’s forum.” (Municipal Charter of a Roman Town). This set of rules was a clear and easy way to get the law out to the Roman people and many city-states of the empire did this. There is no doubt that without these political advances Rome would not have gained so…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Ancient Rome

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ancient Rome was one of the more well known empires in history. Even though there were some disputes within Rome as it was growing, they still were able to expand and build an even larger empire and even reach, what historians call the ¨Pax Romana¨, which was their time of peace among the people. In about 750 BCE there were no signs of infighting and everything was going smoothly. However, under the surface of what was going on, these old disputes were almost all about their government. Rome went from being a republic to an empire, then eventually a dictatorship, which meant that they were a very undecided and organized culture. This all happened because of the different views of their rulers; Rome´s instability began to grow, in sickness and mindsets, as people began fight for what they saw as the ¨best¨ government.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Around the year 400 CE, soldiers began to train without armor, such as helmets and breastplates. This caused the armor to feel heavy amongst the soldiers, who then requested that the soldiers no longer use the armor. Battle after battle, Roman fighters were being killed or retreating due to lack of protection. The troops lost many cities, but were not given the order to resume wearing armor again. Another military problem was that Rome became less strict with conscription, the drafting of soldiers, letting government officials, religious officials, senators, slaves, and cooks escape the draft (Document B). Between the years of 235 and 285 CE, 22 emperors governed Rome, of which 13 were assassinated (Document A). This was a sign to Rome’s people and to outsiders that Rome’s political system was becoming corrupt and that the empire was beginning to weaken. When Germanic tribes and the Huns invaded, Rome couldn’t counter the attack because they didn’t have enough manpower, and the soldiers they had left were unprotected, scared, and…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic is traditionally dated from 509 BC to 27 BC, becoming established with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom and was destroyed with the development of the Roman Empire. When considering the fall of the Roman Republic, it is clear that the reorganisation of the army, particularly through the actions of Marius, Sulla and Caesar, contributed greatly to the disempowerment of the Senate and therefore the Republic. Through the undoubtedly instrumental Marian reforms, the Roman social and militant structure was altered permanently, a design that was manipulated and built upon through the course of Sulla and Caesar’s political careers. Through all of this factors, it is unquestionable that the changing composition of the Roman Army…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Rise Of Rome

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Not confined only to wars for religious or political reasons or against terrorists and enemies, Rome went to battle for the sake of its very survival. Their economy depended greatly on the acquisition of new territories, whose “plunder was a major source of wealth for commanders and soldiers alike...the Romans developed highly formalized ways of acquiring it and distributing it” (Boatwright 146). With each new conquest, the size of the republic ballooned, enabling them to control much of the trade and travel around the Mediterranean and replenishing food supplies through the annexation of hundreds of miles of farmland and crops. The quality of life skyrocketed with the influx of slave labor that enhanced the travel infrastructure with new roads, provided amenities such as running water from new aqueducts to beautiful bathhouses, and promoted religious zeal by creating impressive temples to honor the gods. The jobs that the military created provided an economic boost as well since “the boundaries between citizen and soldier were neither firm nor long-lasting, and large numbers of adult males performed both roles.... citizens eligible for military service came to Rome for the levy, or dilectus, in which some were chosen to be soldiers in the consuls’ armies in the upcoming season...after a season’s campaigning, soldiers were discharged, returning to their places in civil life” (Boatwright 76). Finally, the republic grew stronger as a whole by extending Latin…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome’s constant change of power made the Empire politically unstable. Within a 50 year time period, Rome had a total of 22 emperors. Of them, only two survived to rule for six years and were then both assassinated. Most of the emperors only lived to rule over Rome for only a single year. (Doc A) Without a strong leader that the people could trust, the military lost its determination making it grow weaker as time passed on. Eventually, the men in the army became so out of shape that they stopped wearing their chest plates and other heavy pieces of armour. Without the extra protection, the Roman army became susceptible to bow and arrow attacks making them much more vulnerable. They also stopped using certain weapons and tools that they had been trained to fight with in the past. Without them, the military's tactics grew weaker and less advanced. (Doc B) After losing their edge, the Roman military slowly got pushed back causing the empire to lose land that they had fought so…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is A Tribune

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A tribune is basically an officer of the Roman army they were below the legate and above the centurion. So they are basically the middle rank in the Roman army. They give commands to everyone that is under them and take orders from everyone that is above them. I wonder what it was like being in the Roman army. What type of weapons and armor did they use to defeat their enemies. How did they rank up in the Roman army was it by their loyalty or by how many kills they got in each battle. The people chose who will be in the Roman army. They do this so they know who is protecting them from danger. I think they did this so they felt protected. Cause if they don 't feel protected then they need to get different people in the Roman army. The whole…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons Rome expanded was because of its disciplined military. They could also support their big population with the military, and in their military they had skilled archers and horsemen. As Rome expanded they built a stronger government. Their government at the empires early stages was more of a democracy where the citizens elected officials. After the Roman Empire expanded more, the idea of…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Morey, Rome grew as it expanded its reaches across the Mediterranean, obtaining power over the majority of Latium, northern Campania, southern Etruria, the Sabine country, Picenum, and a portion of Umbria (Morey, 1901). Roman power also consisted of the thirty-three tribes, the Roman colony citizens who would colonnade where they pleased claiming Roman territory, and the Roman municipia territories. Along with the Roman owned territories, the Romans were associated with a multitude of allies through treaties that required their allies to come to their defense in an act of war. Furthermore, the Romans had a strong governmental structure that was in comparison similar to that of the Carthage, however Rome had better organization when it came to its government and perhaps, this is a reflection of the victories throughout the Punic Wars over Carthage. With a structured government, came a mighty and efficient army. However, unlike the hired mercenaries of the Carthage naval fleet, the Romans trained their own citizens to fight and when necessary any male citizens between the ages of 17-45 were required to serve within the army (Morey, 1901). Through experienced citizens and an amazing structure in which the army followed including, training, division of army, order of battle and the strategic placement of military roads; the Roman army was just as…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, the Roman Military became very powerful because of their leaders. One leader that lead the Romans to more power was Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar defeated kings loyal to Pompey in Syria and Asia Minor. Also in 47 B.C., he defeated King Pharnaces II of Pontus at Zela (Modern day Turkey).Caesar then went on to defeat Pompey’s followers in the Battle of Thapsus…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers. Money in this period meant everything. It characterized your status and ranked your authoritative control. During this time, the Senate was supposed to represent the issues and concerns of the general population of Rome. However, the Roman Senate settled on specific matters without alluding to the assembly of the people. As a result, commanders of the military were given expanded term lengths and power.3 All the power that was supposed to be given to the people, as it rightfully is in a true democracy, was now given to the wealthy and well-known nobles. This resulted in the Roman Republic no longer standing as a democratic…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A strong army, strong economy, and strong ties to other countries though trade Rome was prosperous. Power was mainly in the upper class’s hands, much like the Byzantine, Roman, and Persian Empires. A hierarchy was established and followed closely. Rome was not a dictatorship like Persia and Byzantine Empires; it was ruled by an emperor who has the highest amount of power, but a senate was also involved. The senate did not necessarily represent the average people of Rome, they kept the power spread out more. Throughout the development of Rome the power transferred from an Empire to a more democratic society (Lane,2015.). Only men took part in Politics, and most other things outside of the home. Women were educated but, much like in the Persian Empire, they were seen as less than men (Guiduce,2008). Unlike any other Empire, Rome had a clientages, or deal between someone who needed help, and someone that could give help. People exchanged work, loyalty, and support for shelter, companions, employment, among other things. Clientage was a moral agreement, unlike Rome and Persia whose slaves were basically property. War and army were vital to the success of Rome, men were prompted to join in return for land, or other riches (Kagan, Ozment ,Turner, Frank, 2011. The Roman army was different from the Persia in the ways technique, skill and organization. Rome’s army, like Greece’s was well organized and…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays