(It is thought that the Greeks considered trade degrading.) As Rome developed into an urban center, writers compared the simplicity/boorishness/moral high ground of the country's pastoral, and farming life, with the politically charged, trade-based life of a city-center dweller (Ancient History). The social classes of Greece and Rome changed over time, but the basic divisions of early Athens and Rome consisted of free and freedmen, slaves, foreigners, and women. Only some of these were counted as …show more content…
City-states joined together to form leagues that came into conflict, weakening Greece and leading to its conquest by the Macedonian kings and later, the Roman Empire. Kings also originally governed Rome. Then Rome, observing what was happening elsewhere in the world, eliminated them (Ancient History).
It established a mixed Republican form of government, combining elements of democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy, in time, rule by one returned to Rome, but in a new, initially, constitutionally sanctioned form that we know as Roman emperors. The Roman Empire split apart, and, in the West, eventually reverted to small kingdoms (Ancient History). Much of what Rome incorporated into their civilization, was adopted from the Ancient Greek civilization. Grecian women were not considered valuable to society. Both the Greeks and Romans were centered on a social hierarchy. The Greeks created three different types of architecture values. Rome incorporated the arch into their own architectural ideas and also were credited with the use of concrete as a building material. Mythology stories from both civilizations are similar, even though Greeks focused on their lives, were as Romans focus on the afterlife (Ancient