Roman And Han Empires: A Comparative Analysis

Decent Essays
The factor that played out differently in the Roman and Han empires was the social aspect. The reason is affected them differently was because in the Roman empire the peasants and other people in general had lost faith in the empire and therefore contributed less in social events, military, as well as some public affairs. There was also a large gap between the rich and the poor, and since the peasants weren’t patriotic they slacked off with the farming and consequently there were food shortages and even diseases. This was different from China because there, peasants were rebelling due to the fact that there was an increase in taxes. The people of China were also revolting because they started to question their idea of the mandate of heaven.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Athens was a Democratic Republic whereas Han China was Imperial. The most famous ruler of the Han Dynasty was Wudi. He helped the economy greatly by building roads and canals. He also built storage bins for grains. The Han government was Legalistic but had many Confucius advisors because the official belief system was Confucianism.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the classical age, empires and dynasties conquered many large territories. These empires and dynasties included the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty. In a result of expanding their territories, the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had wealth and power. All goods must come to an end, as these empires and dynasties suffered a disastrous collapse. The collapse of the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were more similar than different because their collapse were caused by internal problems within the government and their lack of beliefs in their leaders.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were two empires formed on different parts of Eurasia. Imperial Rome from 31 BCE to 476 CE included their citizens in their government by having consuls elected by patricians, who made up the senate, and assemblies dominated by plebeians. Patricians were the elite class while plebeians were the commoners. Although the citizens did participate in government Rome needed a more centralized form of government. Julius Caesar became the first dictator in Rome and centralized the military and politics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were some of the greatest ruled empires in the world. They both owned huge amounts of land, great economic trade, and impressive military power, but what caused them to fall? Both empires may have had similar ideas, however, their different reasons for their decline in population, economic trade, and failing political systems are what caused them to ultimately fail…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Han Dynasty

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Perhaps some of reasons towards the collapsing of the Han Dynasty were out of their control. Around the end of the 1st century CE, the Han Dynasty had it’s last, dark days. It was believed to be seen as manifestation of the anger of Gods. Han emperors were consistently dying one after another. Additional tragedies were taking place during…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Han China at their peaks were the largest and most successful empires the world had yet seen. While Rome centered around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe- from the Roman city-state in central Italy- Han China was based in most of present day China, with the Han homeland located east in the empire. Although in no close contact of each other- the Roman Empire and Han China being separated by thousands of miles- both of these great civilizations grew to great heights and shared many characteristics. While the declines of the Roman Empire and Han China were very similar, both experiencing a collapsing economy, inefficient government, and invasions by other peoples, the differences in their downfalls lie in the core ideals of the empires and how each issue was handled.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty also faced challenges with a decline in trade; both empires turned towards self-sufficiency. Both empires faced economic pressure involving taxes as well. In China, the government had trouble collecting taxes to support their army, whereas in Rome the taxes began to rise. Roman economic pressure extended; as trade decreased, the value of money went down. Farm fields became overused and started to lack production bringing in poor harvests; the value of gold and silver decreased.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome also had domestic repercussion, but those repercussions were different. In China, they were brief and superficial, while in Rome, the transition from a republic to an empire lasted throughout the empires reign in Europe. Both empires were extremely invested in their public works for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays