After Colorado Carpet had begun installing the carpet, Mrs. Palermo was dissatisfied. Therefore, the installation of the carpet is part of the service in the contract. B. RESOLUTION: [Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. Palermo, 668 P.2d 1384 (Colo. 1983)] How did the court answer the questions? What did the court decide?…
Andrew Rider of Michigan Insurance Company referred this file for medical case management. Instructions were given to meet with Chris Simonson and assist with coordination of appropriate and related medical care, and identify needs to facilitate recovery. INTERVIEW SETTING On 8/25/16 I met Mr. Simonson at the office of Mid Michigan Orthopedics. Mr. Simonson drove independently to the appointment.…
Issue Presented by the Case The first issue presented in this case refers to the allegation of the breach of contract for insurance coverage provided by Steven Lucas. The second issue presented in the case is whether or not Steven Lucas is responsible for providing false information to potential clients. The third issue presented in this case refers to the accountability of Nunn and Vaden examining the policy and what the insurance program entails. Plaintiff…
The lawsuit of Basulto v. Hialeah Automotive had its origins in a contract disagreement between parties. The plaintiffs in the case were Roberto Basulto and Raquel Gonzalez, whom were husband and wife and considered by the courts to be “the buyers”. On the other hand, the defendant in the case was Hialeah Automotive, LLC, who also went by the name of Potamkin Dodge, and was considered by the courts to be “the dealership” (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014). In 2004, Basulto and Gonzalez purchased from Hialeah Automotive a 2005 Dodge Caravan. According to the buyers, the contract provided to them by the dealership was blank with the assurance that the sums would be filled in at a later time (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014).…
This is in response to the breach of contract by Main Line and Kim Basinger in the production of the movie “Boxing Helena.” The defendants and appellants are appealing because they disagree on the sufficiency of the evidence and the excessiveness of the damages. In addition, the defendants state the special verdicts were prejudicially ambiguous because they failed to differentiate between the liability of Mighty Wind and Basinger by using the term…
The defendant wasn’t aware of the Hooters arbitration rules and procedures because they wanted to keep her in the dark on purpose. Annette was also at a large disadvantage due to her contract being heavily one-sided in favor of the employer. The question was brought up as to if Hooters (the employer) held too much power within this contract to the point where it is an unjust contract. Another concern is that the procedures will be too biased because of this power to the…
The Plaintiff alleges she was misled by false misrepresentations claims that she was improving in her abilities and that…
The plaintiff complained to the President of RCC, Larry K Linker regarding the harassment against her by Edwards and demanded a full-year contract instead of the two-month contract. (Sounds like a threat). The President told her…
Third, on September 27, 1982, PSI Cosmetics (defendant), leased a vehicle from Barco Auto (plaintiff). PSI stated that two months later the engine began to smoke and was towed to an authorized dealer. The dealer took over three months to repair a blown motor. The defendants continued making their payments, even though, they had no use of the vehicle. Mr. Golumbia was advised after 300 to 600 miles, he should have the vehicle serviced (retorqued).…
Plaintiff cannot overcome the presumption that out of state students lack the intent to remain in the new state indefinitely. Scoggins v. Pullock, 727 F.2d 1025 (11th Cir. 1984). Mas v. Perry 489 F. 2d 1396 (5th Cir. 1974) In Scoggins, the court held that the presumption was strong unless there was enough evidence to establish that the student’s domicile had indeed changed. The plaintiff in Scoggins originally moved to the new state to undertake graduate studies and did not have any definite future plans to remain in the state.…
Michigan courts will look at three factors to determine whether Ms. Garcia has a sufficient cause of action for tortious interference with a contract: (1) the existence of…
A victim gives notice when the victim: has a channel to file a report, the victim complains to a “point person” or person who has the power to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline employees, and the victim gives the employer enough information for a reasonable employer to believe the victim was probably harassed. Parkins v. Civil Constructors of Ill, Inc. 163 F.3d 1027, 1035 (7th Cir. 1998). In Parkins, the victim was a truck driver for Civil Constructors, who endured sexual stories and innuendos, and inappropriate touching by co-workers for two years. Id. at 1031. The victim reported the sexual harassment to a dispatcher.…
Case Citation: Gray v. Reynolds, 514 So. 2d 973 (1987). Parties: Van Gray, Plaintiff/ Appellant James M. Reynolds and J. Eugene Garrison, Defendants/ Appellees Facts: On March 2, 1984, the plaintiff, Van Gray, had entered into a contract with the defendants, James Reynolds and J. Eugene Garrison, that he would purchase around 9000 tons of sawdust from them at fifty cents per ton. In the contract it was agreed upon that Mr. Gray would remove the sawdust pile and that the payments for the sawdust would be made weekly. Also in the contract, Mr. Gray had to make sure to leave the property level and drainable after removing the sawdust.…
Case 13.3 Kohel v. Bergen Auto Enterprises, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013. 2013 WL 439970. Issue: This case involved allegations of breach of contract involving which parties and for what actions?…
Tralor Corporation manufactures and sells several different lines of small electric components. Its internal audit department completed an audit of its expenditure processes. Part of the audit involved a review of the internal accounting controls for payables, including the controls over the authorization of transactions, accounting for transactions, and the protection of assets. The auditors noted the following items: 1. Routine purchases are initiated by inventory control notifying the purchasing department of the need to buy goods.…