Roles Of Judicial Judges

Improved Essays
The role of the judiciary is to administer justice to all citizens and it comprises of courts that take decisions on a very large number of cases. Judicial independence is the keystone of Canadian judiciary. That is the reason, the judiciary is an independent from other branches of government, the executive and legislative. The main role of a judge is to interpret laws. Judicial independence means that, the other organs of the government must not restrain the functioning and should not interfere with its decision of the judiciary in such a way that is unable to do justice. Judges must be able to perform their duties without fear or favor. Judges play a crucial role in Canadian democracy and judiciary protects the rights of an individual.
The
…show more content…
Most important aspect is that, judges make decisions in the pursuit of justice. Judges make sure both sides follow the rules for a fair trial. Criminal and civil cases are heard by a judge sitting without a jury. (Role of the Judge (n.d.)

According to judiciary in Canada, 2017, judges apply a common law after interpreting the objective and the application of both written statues passed by parliament and the provincial legislatures. If citizens are unhappy with the actions of government or a public body or feel their human rights violated, the courts can intervene. All laws apply equally to all citizens of the country and no one can be above the law. any crime or violation of law has a specific punishment as well as a process through which the guilt of the person has to be established.

According to Canadian judicial council, n.d, Judicial Independence is ensured by three things:
• Security of tenure – Once appointed, a judge must serve until the age of retirement.
• Financial security – Judges are paid enough so they are free of pressure from other institutions.
• Administrative independence – The chief justice in each province and territory decides how that court can manage the litigation process and which cases the judges will hear. (Canadian judicial council,
…show more content…
Richard, Federal Court of Canada, 2000, public education has itself become an important part of a judge's office. It includes:
“First, the preservation of a free and democratic society necessitates that the role of the judiciary be the subject of a dynamic and ongoing discussion.
“Second, as noted by Ronald Dworkin in his book entitled "Law's Empire", judicial decisions affect a great many people. The Court has the power to overrule even the most deliberate and popular decisions of governments if it believes they are contrary to the Constitution”. (John d Richard, 2000). judiciary is not dependent on any government to make decisions and their primary aim is to protect all citizens based on law. It is for this reason that judges are placed on a separate branch under the constitution. The role of the courts as resolver of disputes, interpreter of the law and defender of the Constitution and the Charter, requires that they be separate in authority and function from all other participants in the justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mighty Judgement Summary

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Mighty Judgement, Philip Slayton talks about the Supreme Court of Canada as a government institution which needs reform on the premises that Supreme Court of Canada is powerful, paternalistic, competent, undemocratic, and secretive. Slayton begins with the question of whether judges make or interpret the law and whether they should be doing only one of those things. Also, he describes the historical past of the Supreme Court, and how the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms affected the cases which reach the Supreme Court. Slayton also analyzed the Supreme Court of Canada and came up with possible overdue reforms based on his experience as a lawyer, academic, and a previous Supreme Court clerk.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Justice System

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the Canadian Criminal Justice System, we ask many questions such as, “what is justice?”and “are equity and the rights of the accused being compromised in the name of efficiency?” Justice is when a person receives fairness and their moral rightness from the legal system which is decided by attorney 's, judges, legislatures, and by society. Based on this definition of justice, we wonder if equity and the rights of the accused is being compromised by the legal system. Many people may think that the Canadian Criminal Justice System may be unfair and not seek justice for those who deserve it, others may argue against that and believe that the Canadian Criminal Justice System shows equity and the rights of the accused. Sometimes…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court role is to uphold the rules of the law, provide a forum to resolve doubts and find the truth, and to enforce the law in a fair, accurate, and rational way. They also…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. "(Library of Congress). This means, in theory, that any US citizen should be able to vote no matter what their background. But the limits of this amendment are very apparent. This amendment does not guarantee rights of black women, they were not able to vote until 1920, earned with the rise of the woman’s suffrage movement.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian courts work together to uphold rights and create checks…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the following paper you will see the correlations between the three major components of the Canadian criminal justice system. First we must examine each of the components of the criminal justice system alone before we get to understand how they overlap together. First of all, there is the police, the courts and the corrections. The police are the law enforcers and maintainers of order throughout Canada. There are three levels of policing in Canada; municipal, provincial and federal, there are some circumstances that they work together to accomplish a common goal.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment No. 2 Assignment’s Topic : Judicial System In Islam (Part 2) The Independence Of The Judiciary : The laws of Islam , through it’s basic principles and sacred texts prohibits government officials from interfering in the matters of court and judges , they must respect respect their decisions inspite of becoming a hurdle for them . Islamic law in its individual statutes and general principles , tells us to realize its primary objective to establish justice on the basis of monotheism , it (monotheism) is not just lip service . It verifies the profession of faith realized through actions , the actions must contain what Allah has commanded and preventing from what Allah has prohibited…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays