Roles Of Judges In The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
What is the role of a judge is a question that is often asked. Maybe its best to state what a judge doesn't do? Ensuring that the system operates fairly and impartially, actors in the criminal justice process such as the judge is put in the position to be the symbol of justice. Judges are the criminal justice systems impartial decision makers. Granite there is a mass amount of important roles in the court room, the formal powers of judges extend throughout the criminal court process. The actual influence that a judge has on a court room is a lot of times underestimated. Judges hold a powerful domination over the other factors that operate in the system daily. From arrest to the final deposition that sentences a defendant judges are affecting …show more content…
The public believes that judges are the principle decision makers in courts. But in all actuality they are constrained from the prosecutors, defense attorneys and probation officers. Judges usually have to piggy back off of what other members of the court room have to present. From judges accepting bail recommendations offered from the prosecutor, plea agreements presented and negotiated by defense lawyers, and sentences and probation sentences recommended by the probation officer. But by all means are we to say that judges are ruled are controlled by other members of the court room. According to (Neubauer& Fradella, 2014) The amount of influence that judges exert on the other members of the court room varies. Some judges are known to be very strict. The strict judge will not allow a ton of continuances, attorneys and or lawyers arriving late in the court room and lawyers having a lack of evidence. On the flip side some judges are more relaxed and easy going. Mastering the law and following the procedure of law are ways that will change the characters of judges. Determining the sentences that are given out, how many sentences and or cases are pending and the turnaround rate for judge’s helps determine the differential between their

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    William Wayne Justice, he was a formidable judge that sat on the federal bench in the state of Texas. He brought forth change throughout his years as a judge and some of those changes would be major reform decisions that will change the systems in Texas. He was a judge that made decisions that influenced changes and it was noticed not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. Judge Justice was involved in many controversial cases and reforms that gained attention all over. Not only the cases were controversial, but his decisions were ones that got people talking about him.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, judges make decisions based on public perception, and thus this upholds the independence of the judiciary, making decisions with complete discretion. The independence of the judiciary is protected through s 72 of the Constitution, which protects the tenure and remuneration of the federal judges. With the guarantee and security of tenure, judges are not held accountable to external opinion and public perception. This means that the federal judges do not need to be threatened or adhere to the Executive or the general public, as it is only the Governor-General that can discharge them. The functions that were given to the Chapter III courts in Kable could not be conferred so as to diminish public confidence.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge may also feel pressured to support the group who donated money to their election campaign. Another factor that may help correct the system would be to remove judicial party affiliation. Judges who are affiliated with either party are…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adding more complications to the issue is the lack of an impartial criterion determining the competence of a judge. Additionally, most judges are not required to pass any qualifying tests or to demonstrate their competence by any means, exemplifying a potential for unqualified…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judges make these choices all the time causing them to use a variety of sociopathic tendencies. So might as well assign judges with these traits already in them..RIGHT!? To commence this argument,the guilt of basically giving the order to murder or even incarcerate another human being no matter how cold or even dangerous they are, would slowly kill any human mind, to…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the film we are positioned to view the judges as a force of power the dictates what happens in the world of ballroom. This is clearly shown in the very first scene when the dancers are shown on the floor while the judges are on the stage/higher…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The differences in the judges’ attitudes…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court role is to uphold the rules of the law, provide a forum to resolve doubts and find the truth, and to enforce the law in a fair, accurate, and rational way. They also…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The ten purposes of court are (1) to do justice. (2) is for the courts to appear to do justice. (3) Provide a forum where disputes can be resolved peacefully and justly, (4) the courts have to censure wrongdoing, (5) achieve a possible outcome…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was the start of building America up into what we see today and has lasted for over 200 years. Its inception as the Articles of Confederation or the “hand-shake” among states, grew into something more united (U.S. Constitution signed, n.d.). With the signing of the Constitution of the United States in 1787, the republic government was formed and established the three branches of government with overlapping powers. The three branches include the Legislative, Executive and Judicial organizations.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The federal judges are nominated by the President of the United States, and approved but the United States Senate. With having the definitive authority in the courts, the judge is the only one who can set bail, instruct jurors about the meaning of the law, and impose sentences. With a plea of guilty, it is the quickest way to resolve a heavy caseload for not only the judge, but also the prosecutors and defense…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My initial thoughts on this quote were, “What does Hamilton mean by the ‘sword or the purse’?” After reading his quote a few more times, I understood that he was implying that the judicial branch has no authority over the power or the finances of society. It seems that Hamilton felt as if these are the foundations of society and that as long as the judiciary branch has no power over these factors, then it can pose no threat and cause no harm; therefore, being the least dangerous branch. Hamilton is wrong, because while this particular branch may not have direct power over these elements of society, at the end of the day the judicial branch has overview on all laws and the constitutionality of those laws. While each branch has a diverse specific…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These judges play a major part in the more controlled civil court system where they gathering evidence, ask questions of witnesses, interrogate suspects, declare verdicts and decide on a penalty. A good judge can create a more equal playing field for all sides regardless of the resources at their disposal. Opponents of the civil law system argue that it is inflexible as it does not allow any interpretation of the law.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    They need to be loyal to the rule of law because of procedural fairness. It is difficult to treat same kind of cases the same way and different cases differently because there are other factors that play into each crime, but the court should be consistent with prior decisions. Judges do not have full discretion because they have guidelines they need to rule by. Judges cannot go below or above sentencing guidelines. The way the use their discretion is by the mitigating and aggravating factors that prosecutors and defense attorneys present.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays