Black (2014) described implementation as the step in which the planned interventions are carried out (p. 225). It is stated that during the previous steps the nurse was constantly assessing his or her patient, nothing responses, and modifying the care plan (Black, 2014 p. 225). Not to forget it is essential for nurses to document information gathered in the previous phases (Black, 2014, p. 225). In addition, the final step of the nursing process is an evaluation. The nurses need to assess his or her patient’s growth regarding the goals, whether or not the problem was resolved if the goals are met or partially met, or perhaps not met at all (Black, 2014, p. 226). Evaluation helps us determine if the nursing process was effect and or successfully,
…show more content…
As Türk, Tuğrul, and Şahbaz, (2013) stated, “NANDA-I nursing diagnoses are used throughout the world to create a common and standard language in nursing care” (p. 131). Having a standard language in nursing is fundamental because it does not allow misunderstanding to constantly take place in the nursing field. For instance, if nurses have the same definitions, it eliminates the probability that the word will be misused in another situation. As stated by NANDA-I (2016), their purpose is to “develop, refine and promote terminology that accurately reflects nurses ' clinical judgments” (para. 3). As we can see, with the help of NANDA-I nurses are able to precise terminology. In my opinion, NANDA-I makes it easier so nurses to choose a diagnosis that relates to the assessment of the …show more content…
Lunney (2010) stated, “Continuous development of critical thinking (CT) abilities for use in the diagnostic process is needed because diagnoses of human responses are the foundation of nursing care” (p. 82). Critical thinking takes place throughout the nursing process; as a result, it is safe to say that critical thinking is a crucial part of the nursing process. Without critical thinking, the nurse might not be able to come up with the most reasonable answer to a patient problem or concern. On the other hand, critical thinking is not a step-by-step process that is continuously repeated in a cycle like the nursing process. Critical thinking is recognized when an individual can back up their statement with applicable evidence (Black, 2014, p. 216). For example, a nurse figuring out which of the patient’s medication can possibly interact with each other, so that the physician can administer an alternative
As Türk, Tuğrul, and Şahbaz, (2013) stated, “NANDA-I nursing diagnoses are used throughout the world to create a common and standard language in nursing care” (p. 131). Having a standard language in nursing is fundamental because it does not allow misunderstanding to constantly take place in the nursing field. For instance, if nurses have the same definitions, it eliminates the probability that the word will be misused in another situation. As stated by NANDA-I (2016), their purpose is to “develop, refine and promote terminology that accurately reflects nurses ' clinical judgments” (para. 3). As we can see, with the help of NANDA-I nurses are able to precise terminology. In my opinion, NANDA-I makes it easier so nurses to choose a diagnosis that relates to the assessment of the …show more content…
Lunney (2010) stated, “Continuous development of critical thinking (CT) abilities for use in the diagnostic process is needed because diagnoses of human responses are the foundation of nursing care” (p. 82). Critical thinking takes place throughout the nursing process; as a result, it is safe to say that critical thinking is a crucial part of the nursing process. Without critical thinking, the nurse might not be able to come up with the most reasonable answer to a patient problem or concern. On the other hand, critical thinking is not a step-by-step process that is continuously repeated in a cycle like the nursing process. Critical thinking is recognized when an individual can back up their statement with applicable evidence (Black, 2014, p. 216). For example, a nurse figuring out which of the patient’s medication can possibly interact with each other, so that the physician can administer an alternative