Role Of Secession In Texas

Improved Essays
Politically, the Unionist leadership were out matched by the wave of secessionist leadership coming into power during the mid-to-late 1950s in Texas. The next three articles describe typical traits of the Unionist leadership and how those traits motivated them both politically and socially in the eventual support for or against secession. Kenneth Wayne Howell’s article, “When the Rabble Hiss, Well May Patriots Tremble: James Webb Throckmorton and the Secession Movement in Texas, 1854-1861,” describes the political life of one of the most outspoken critics of secession in Texas, James Webb Throckmorton. By providing a detailed analysis of Throckmorton’s opposition to secession, Howell “provides a framework for understanding Unionism in the …show more content…
Howell asserts “two critical events occurred that fueled the flames of secession in Texas – John Brown’s raid at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia, and an insurrection-arson panic, which swept through East Texas.” These events caused fear within citizenry that helped fuel the secessionist propaganda that used “any accident or deviant behavior in the state on abolitionist plots designed to kill white Southerners and to free the slaves.” Throckmorton and Reagan continued to fight secession from within up until the secession convention. Once the citizens voted three to one for secession, he like other moderate Unionists, joined the Confederate military. He cites three reasons for joining with the Confederates. First, he feared reprisals from Confederates who would attack those who supported the Unionist vote in North Texas, so he encouraged others to follow his example and join the Confederate military. Second, he feared that without the Federal army to protect the frontier from Indian raids, he needed the Confederate army to fill the void left by the Federal army in protecting the frontier. Finally, the Republican Party had taken steps to towards enacting policies “that would free the South’s slaves and that would ultimately guarantee them equality with whites.” This threat of black equality, threatened the social and cultural society of the South. Unionist, like Throckmorton, believing in white superiority, decided to join the Confederate army to block the initiatives started by Lincoln’s Republican Party. Howell’s study on Throckmorton demonstrates an accurate analysis towards understanding Unionist in Texas. He provides an excellent list of characteristics of a typical moderate Unionist, the reasons for fighting the secessionist, and provides reasons why Unionist, like Throckmorton and Reagan, later joined the Confederate military following the secession

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Young Guard

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Who were the "young guard?" Views? Generally-speaking, the “young guard” is a coined term that namely refers to the coterie of newer leaders, who tenaciously desired to revolutionize the Union altogether. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “They [young guard] were more interested in purging and purifying it [Union]. A strong anti-slaveryite, he [William H. Seward] came out unequivocally against concession.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “… five states of the lower South-Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, and Louisiana-appointed commissioners to other slave states and instructed them to spread the secessionist message across the entire region” (17) “Mississippi and Alabama commissioners were appointed by the governor and thus took the field first.” (17) Only these two were appointed by the governor and the other states, South Carolina, Georgia, and Louisiana, commissioners were appointed by the secession conventions. (17) 2. How did the commissioners attempt to fulfill their mission? Cite specific examples of their activities, naming the specific individuals.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War is perhaps one of the most written about topics in the field of history, and there are certainly many who devote their time to the events preceding it. In Rachel A. Shelden’s book, Washington Brotherhood: Politics, Social Life, and the Coming of the Civil War, tells a story beyond the events individuals are familiar with. Rather, Shelden discusses the events during the Antebellum period through a social and personal lens of Washington’s political aristocracy. In doing so, she connects familiar events to personal experiences, allowing for a more insightful view of the Civil War.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bitterly Divided Summary

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It came as quite a shock to me to find out that much of the South was not supportive of the Civil War in the first place, including my own hometown of Harris County, Georgia, where it was even stated that they were “Union loving people” (10). In reality, the main people who…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course of his book, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam, James McPherson examines not only the events that occurred on September 17, 1862, but he also outlines the causes and explanations for the American Civil War. Firstly, McPherson emphasizes the role that slavery played in causing the war and he shares details regarding the outcomes and results of this historic battle. McPherson’s second main objective of this book is to highlight how tentative General McClellan was over the course of the war. General McClellan was too cautious in engaging the Confederate Army even when he had the captured plans of General Lee.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the author of one article in the Burlington Hawk-Eye in the spring of 1862, the use of “the blood-hounds of rebellion” against Southern Unionists epitomized…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The astonished reactions Tallmadge had so appropriately received were a result of his introduction of an amendment regarding slavery in Missouri, and how he supposed it should be properly handled. Within the amendment, Tallmadge proposed that slavery in Missouri should be used to “prohibit the further introduction of slaves into Missouri and to provide for the gradual emancipation of those born thereafter the admission of the state” ( ___2__ ). As the border states and Virginia in particular focused a whirlwind of attention onto the new territories, in hopes of auctioning off its “ dangerous surplus of slaves”, the amendment could not, realistically, last for an extended period of time. “Approved by the House but defeated by the Senate, it precipitated a controversy which became nationwide” ( __2___). Through the employment of a debate which viewed both sides of the discrepancy as brought about by Tallmadge’s proposed amendment, on the 16th of February in the year 1819, the House allowed the “Missouri bill” to pass, entailing with it the internal harborings of “slavery restrictions”, though it was only passed by…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The thought of Lincoln taking their slaves, despite his promise not to, led them to secession. In the years preceding the Civil War both sides were forced to concede points to avoid violence, but in the end, it only delayed the inevitable fighting and made those for and against slavery frustrated and ready to bear arms. As the country’s stakes on land increased in size so too did the stakes of the issue at hand. Gradually, as the year, 1860 approached Americans faced a matter that could not be left alone.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Confederates who saw the Northern Yankees as nothing more than tyrants. A young Virginian officer’s letters stated this belief “confident that the Confederacy would win this “second War for American Independence” because Tyranny cannot prosper in the nineteenth century” against “a people fighting for their liberties.’’ (9). Like how the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We will retreat till we find a suitable place in Ala. to make a stand and then there will be a big fight… Tell Lissy not to talk to me about marrying here. If I ever marry it will be in Texas [my home], (John Wesley Rabb letters, Doc D). ” Our Texan citizens not only violated, but betrayed by the North, and many were willing to pay the ultimate price to fight for what their beloved state. Across the South, people were outraged at the fact that they were stripped of their rights, economic stability, and most of all their honor and pride. Many Texans fought to the death to defend these inherent rights, and to preserve their way of life.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason Texans fought in the Civil War was to protect their state rights. “No state upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “Apostles of Disunion,” by Charles B. Dew, we are presented with ideas of secession, slavery and racism. The overall goal in this book was to prove the causes of the Civil War. We are given experiences and background from southerner, Charles B. Dew in order to justify the underlying reason for the cause of the War. During this time period of 1860-1861 there was a lot of talk as to what the real cause of the Civil War was, in which there have been many theories and hypothesis’ from historians as to what was the true reasoning was behind it all. Being a southerner, Dew is passionate about his facts, and researches to better support his argument.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War was very misunderstood in that no one really knows the exact reason of why the war started. In Apostles of Disunion, Dew discusses topics such as slavery, racism, economics and state rights to push his point of view on the audience of why the war and secession began. Charles B. Dew wrote this book to inform the audience the secession came from not just the factor of state rights during the time between 1860 and 1861. Because Dew was a Southerner himself, he writes the book off of self-knowledge, experience others, and facts including people and their perspectives on the cause. The most common claim when it came to The Civil War’s cause is it beginning due to slavery and racism in the south; however Dew argues that the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Apostles of Disunion, Charles Dew discusses how he originally thought that states’ rights were the predominant reason that the Civil War occurred. This point of view stemmed from his readings as a boy and his ancestor’s experiences with the war. The central idea behind the authors writing of the book is his analysis of the letters and speeches that the secession commissioners wrote, in which he sought the reasons other than states’ rights to their secession from the Union. Correspondingly, he argues for the centrality of race and slavery as the reasons for the South’s secession. What’s more, is the reasoning behind why the author is writing this book and his projected achievements from doing so.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays