It would e better to write this paper as a Rogerian argument because it would help the author approach the audience in a way that is open and considerate. When using this approach, it helps the author create a common ground with the audience. While traditional arguments mail goal is to win rather than understand like the Rogerian argument. I believe the author did a good job explaining both positions to the reader without being completely bias about one position than the other. The Rogerian argument approaches the reader in a way that makes them feel heard and that their views are being recognized. Some constraints of the argument could be the authors personal beliefs that could affect the communication between the author and the reader. Those
