January 22, 1973, a decision was made to legalize the medical practice of abortion. The case of Roe V. Wade was first argued in court on December, 13, 1971 and then was finalized January, 22, 1973. The case of Roe V. Wade is one of high controversy and creates tension between many. Along with the recent election of president Donald J. Trump the abortion controversy has re-resin and is being debated more and more frequently in day to day conversations. As communities’ debate point of views related to the abortion controversy there has become an opinion of pro-choice and that of pro-life. As opinions are present, articles are written, and within these articles are facts and points of view. When choosing a side such as pro-life or that of pro-choice
…show more content…
The “The Majority of America is Now Pro-Choice” written by: Maureen Shaw is centered around the facts. It tells that seven in ten of Americans say that the Roe V. Wade law shouldn’t be fully over turned (Shaw). The article has also heavily centerlines the case of Roe V. Wade while still giving the percentages of democrats and republicans that feel the Roe V. Wade case shouldn’t be over turned. Within Shaw’s argument comes that the pro-life prospective. On the website, Association of Pro-Life Physicians (APLP), article, “When Does Human Life Begin?”, (WDHB) the writers incorporate the 5 points of criteria that classify life as life. These 5 points allow one to set a boundary for what’s living and what is not. The article APLP may not have a specified author but the source is still we credited. As Shaw’s article states that more Americans are not wanting to overturn the legalization of abortion is due to the election of president Donald J. Trump. Shaw’s argument however possibly relevant is shown with in the article to have a lack of evidence. Contrary to this the article WDHB allows readers to digest the information without an unsupported …show more content…
Then we have the article “Holistically Pro-Life” by: Trillia Newbell. Newbell’s article focuses on a religious based argument. Arthur states with in her article that pro-choice supports are the middle ground of the debate. Later in the article she then restates that, “no common ground exists”. The belief of Arthur is one that instates the worst of her competitor. The words of Newbell don’t belittle that of pro-choice supporters. However, Newbell’s beliefs bring that of a higher power into play. The belief that God placed and created us is the main stream idea within her article. She uses many proverbs quotations from the bible as her source of facts. With Arthur’s belief of common ground and that pro-life supports forced mother hood, along with the avoidance of intercourse related topics. Newbell’s article however, states that pro-life supporters such as her and her followers state that they support all life and that’s what pro-life stands
The “The Majority of America is Now Pro-Choice” written by: Maureen Shaw is centered around the facts. It tells that seven in ten of Americans say that the Roe V. Wade law shouldn’t be fully over turned (Shaw). The article has also heavily centerlines the case of Roe V. Wade while still giving the percentages of democrats and republicans that feel the Roe V. Wade case shouldn’t be over turned. Within Shaw’s argument comes that the pro-life prospective. On the website, Association of Pro-Life Physicians (APLP), article, “When Does Human Life Begin?”, (WDHB) the writers incorporate the 5 points of criteria that classify life as life. These 5 points allow one to set a boundary for what’s living and what is not. The article APLP may not have a specified author but the source is still we credited. As Shaw’s article states that more Americans are not wanting to overturn the legalization of abortion is due to the election of president Donald J. Trump. Shaw’s argument however possibly relevant is shown with in the article to have a lack of evidence. Contrary to this the article WDHB allows readers to digest the information without an unsupported …show more content…
Then we have the article “Holistically Pro-Life” by: Trillia Newbell. Newbell’s article focuses on a religious based argument. Arthur states with in her article that pro-choice supports are the middle ground of the debate. Later in the article she then restates that, “no common ground exists”. The belief of Arthur is one that instates the worst of her competitor. The words of Newbell don’t belittle that of pro-choice supporters. However, Newbell’s beliefs bring that of a higher power into play. The belief that God placed and created us is the main stream idea within her article. She uses many proverbs quotations from the bible as her source of facts. With Arthur’s belief of common ground and that pro-life supports forced mother hood, along with the avoidance of intercourse related topics. Newbell’s article however, states that pro-life supporters such as her and her followers state that they support all life and that’s what pro-life stands