Aristotle's Life Of A Public Figure Essay

Good Essays
In this essay, I will use the life of a well-known public figure and describe why it conflicts with the views of Aristotle in terms of happiness and virtue. The life of this public figure was often praised by others who enjoyed what he represented. I will use the teachings and views of Aristotle to analyze why the life of this figure which was full of wealth, fame and prestige was truly not what it was portrayed to be. Before I begin, I would like to raise this question that will be the basis of this essay: “Are we made happy by what we have in life or by who we truly are deep down inside?”
Robin Williams, a world famous actor, captivated audiences in the roles such as: Peter Pan, Mrs. Doubtfire and Hook. He is known for his sense of humor
…show more content…
In same token, his view of happiness is the ultimate end goal of human life. According to Aristotle, happiness also depended on moral virtue. Having moral virtue was a way of fulfilling one’s life. Each individual reaches to find that end of life. In order for a person to be or feel happiness then the person has to live in some form of an active life of virtue, because only this can provide the end in which is sought. He believed that happiness is the action of the soul which is in virtue. Aristotle was convinced that a wide range of actions included both physical and mental well-being. He indicates that what others consider certain actions chosen as a pursuit of happiness, Aristotle believes them as a means or a step of many to the final end. Happiness is thought to be something that gratifies the person’s ability. In other words, if an individual participates in something that is satisfying then that individual is happy. Achieving happiness must compare to balance of pleasure and self-reliance. When a person achieves happiness then they have designed and followed their own virtues and lived out those virtues to the ultimate possibility. Happiness cannot be described by the amount of pleasure. It is both pleasure and pains that an individual experiences in their lives.
In conclusion, reviewing Robin Williams’ life and studying Aristotle’s view of happiness, I would have

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For Epicurus, he believed that human pleasure was the ultimate happiness. He believed that virtues were a way to gain human pleasure. Aristotle did not agree with pleasure being the source of happiness. Instead, he believed that a person should look out for their own self-interests. Secondly, both philosophers believed that happiness can be found in the community.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He believed in two different states that each person has; the Good and the End (“Moral Philosophy”). When describing the Good, Socrates explains that people unconsciously do things that make them happy and that physical objects make one feel satisfied at the same time (“Moral Philosophy”). The whole idea of the Good is that humans act in a positive way and that they just want to live a happy and meaningful life (Moral Philosophy”). Happiness is the one thing all humans want to have in their lives and the Good is that explanation. The End is the other idea Socrates had and goes along with the Good.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By doing this, he clarifies what one must look for in seeking virtue, and how one should compare their meanings of virtue. This gives humans a structure and guideline to follow, so that one has the possible to obtain the “good life”, which is that of happiness. But happiness is also presented as a false idol, as it can be an emotional high, such that one will feel happy. This is not, by aristotle’s description, true…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Aristotle happiness is something, “final and self-sufficing, and this is the end of all that man does”. In order to gain a more fundamental explanation, he then pursued the question of what is the function of man. He found that man’s function is the “exercise of his vital faculties in obedience to reason”. He says, happiness is an, “excellence or kind of excellence”. According to him, it is virtues that lead to happiness.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In distinguishing the functions in each of Aristotle’s arguments, it elicits the belief in man’s responsibility to further improve the self to attain a life enriched in goodness. In turn, this goodness then establishes a happy life. However, it is not proven that the ultimate ends lies within happiness. Instead, it is approximated that human life benefits from this. The science of politics promotes moral value, and is exercised with substantiating goodness in…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the event that the ethics were just a significance to happiness, then they may neglect to cause happiness in different conditions, and one may have the capacity to accomplish happiness with essentially the presence of morality. Be that as it may, if morality is the preeminent constituent of happiness, then one couldn 't be happy without being righteous, and one couldn 't be righteous without being happy.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After careful examination of human intentions and actions, Aristotle makes a convincing argument regarding the pursuit of humans to reach eudemonia. Since happiness as a disposition is the end goal, Aristotle effectively articulates strategies and avenues to live a virtuous life. The spectrum of virtue is incredibly convincing, as the same exact situation can happen, but the context and the individuals involved would significantly change the approach and solutions offered for each situation. The only way to address the differences is through analysis and introspection of the context. There are mild flaws in Aristotle’s arguments.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They both agreed on one aspect of happiness. They both came to the final conclusion that in order to attain genuine happiness, men should be engaging in activities that are specific to humans. Aristotle argues that and individual practicing their virtues is what ultimately leads to their happiness. Aristotle states that “virtue is a trained faculty or habit.” (Aristotle) This implies that the habit of choosing the thing that makes a person good leads to happiness.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to him, happiness or human flourishing is a sufficient good which is desired for itself, not for the sake of something else and this happiness is the ultimate end or purpose of life that provides the best life. Being virtuous brings about being happy. Therefore, Aristotle’s idea of happiness can be interpreted as objective since living a virtuous life leads all humans to be happy and all human beings have the same basic nature which requires the same things to be happy. However, virtue in his ethics also is related to the agent’s character. If virtue is dependent on our character, it can demonstrate itself through habit.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Human good is fulfilling and most desirable, therefore human good in life correlates with virtue. Happiness is a belief. Similar to other beliefs, it is prone to contain fallacies and delusions. Aristotle says that happiness is an end, or the result of things a person does. The…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays