Roberts Rutland's The Ordeal Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
To wrap it up the clear choice book which was more persuasive was obviously Roberts Rutland’s “The Ordeal of the Constitution”. Rutland neatly points out key Antifederalists arguments into detail and goes on to explain this as a cutthroat battle between the Federalists and Antifederalists which would resolve later into the American political system often going into extreme detail from state to state on demographic studies. In that case, the Antifederalist’s even though they lost the war still won enough clear battles to morph American thought in a way which helped their cause in winning a Bill of Rights and securing the freedoms of a Bill of Rights. Another key point was the context of many key speakers who stood up for this cause such as Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, George Mason. These people who stood …show more content…
Rutland gives us a perspective of the Antifederalist side and not just the Federalist points of view in this paper which gives us the inside context of these people not just as opposition to the government, but as opposition to what these people were doing in context to morph the government. The biggest issue of the book, however, was Rutland’s book was not painting a broadened scope from the Federalists point of view as he clearly favors the book from the Antifederalist side and gives them tons of credit where it is not due. For example, he often goes into “What if?” strategies which give inconsistency within the book making it harder to read and brutal for the reader. As for Cornell’s biggest weakness, the biggest issue was explaining the Antifederalists in a broader setting. Cornell in his crusade for painting a good side to the Antifederalists leaves open the other half of the equation out quite remarkably: The Federalist’s. He often went on tangents which promoted the Antifederalists as these heroes while painting the Federalists as evil, aristocratic enemies to the United States making his overall tone favor more which was a major flaw

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Larry Sabato, an American political scientist who graduated from the University of Oxford, recommends a new constitutional convention to revise the current United States constitution to change all three branches of government. The proposals Sabato is offering do not do any good, as this paper proves later. Constitutional amendments can be great in cases like the 14th or 21st, but these proposals would not do anything like that . Sabato’s opinion on how to revise the judicial branch by increasing the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to twelve and adding a Balanced Budget amendment to prevent any deficit spending are good ideas in theory, but in reality, neither would work.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus, a pseudonym for Robert Gates, was an Anti-Federalist who was against the signing of the Constitution. He wrote to the citizens of New York many documents on his views and why the United States should not be under this new government. In his first paper, he talked about how Congress, the new body of government, could undermine the States under certain circumstances. Also he proposed reasons why this new way of ruling could not rule over such a vast territory that this brand new country came upon on. Many of Brutus’ examples and reasoning still exists in today’s modern era in which these contemporary political circumstances still impact us daily.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wood in The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1992). Wood argues that instead of increasing in prominence, by 1800 the revolutionary leaders could do little more than watch helplessly as their utopian vision of a republican society based on civic virtue was mutated into a democratic system centered on the self-interest and personal greed of ordinary Americans. The same elites who had made “the interests and prosperity of ordinary people- their pursuits of happiness- the goal of society and government,” found themselves struggling against a wave of corruption they could not hope to stop. These gentlemen of society placed safeguards into the governmental framework to ensure that the “betters” of society, those disinterested individuals, would retain positions necessary to determine the common good. This effort culminated in the ratification of the United States Constitution, which Bouton counters as the embodiment of elitist authoritarianism.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack N. Rakove Summary

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rakove makes the astute observation that many Americans are sadly not aware of the beginning years of their Republic, much less are they aware of its creator, James Madison. In his short and concise book, Rakove seamlessly integrates political science and history into one whole, moving from discussing Madison to the early Confederation and Republic’s many moving parts, then back to Madison. Fortunately for Rakove, Madison felt the need to keep an accurate historical record for later Americans, and so he wrote many of this thoughts and feelings down, allowing for a level of “direct connectivity” between the reader and Madison himself. As well as these primary sources, Rakove employs many other highly-praised secondary sources to better uncover Madison and his life for the general reader. Overall, this book is a wonderfully useful piece of historical research that has been designed for use by anyone interested in learning more about early American history and politics, and confirms Rakove’s thesis that Madison was indeed a remarkable…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gordon Wood and Gary B. Nash are both are very vocal supporters of their respective schools of thought, occasionally to their detriment. However, there are few authors that present their cases as clearly as these two historians, and as a result much can be gained by taking a look at an exemplary work by each author. First we will consider Gordon Wood’s The Radicalization of the American Revolution (Random House, 1991). In this award winning synthesis Wood sought to challenge the widely held contention that the American Revolution was a conservative undertaking that was meant to maintain the status qou within the colonies.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays