Rutland gives us a perspective of the Antifederalist side and not just the Federalist points of view in this paper which gives us the inside context of these people not just as opposition to the government, but as opposition to what these people were doing in context to morph the government. The biggest issue of the book, however, was Rutland’s book was not painting a broadened scope from the Federalists point of view as he clearly favors the book from the Antifederalist side and gives them tons of credit where it is not due. For example, he often goes into “What if?” strategies which give inconsistency within the book making it harder to read and brutal for the reader. As for Cornell’s biggest weakness, the biggest issue was explaining the Antifederalists in a broader setting. Cornell in his crusade for painting a good side to the Antifederalists leaves open the other half of the equation out quite remarkably: The Federalist’s. He often went on tangents which promoted the Antifederalists as these heroes while painting the Federalists as evil, aristocratic enemies to the United States making his overall tone favor more which was a major flaw
Rutland gives us a perspective of the Antifederalist side and not just the Federalist points of view in this paper which gives us the inside context of these people not just as opposition to the government, but as opposition to what these people were doing in context to morph the government. The biggest issue of the book, however, was Rutland’s book was not painting a broadened scope from the Federalists point of view as he clearly favors the book from the Antifederalist side and gives them tons of credit where it is not due. For example, he often goes into “What if?” strategies which give inconsistency within the book making it harder to read and brutal for the reader. As for Cornell’s biggest weakness, the biggest issue was explaining the Antifederalists in a broader setting. Cornell in his crusade for painting a good side to the Antifederalists leaves open the other half of the equation out quite remarkably: The Federalist’s. He often went on tangents which promoted the Antifederalists as these heroes while painting the Federalists as evil, aristocratic enemies to the United States making his overall tone favor more which was a major flaw