Robert Wennberg's Arguments For Euthanasia

Decent Essays
The author, Robert N. Wennberg, agrees with euthanasia. There are three factors which indicate his position is for euthanasia: Amount of evidence, the author’s comments on the evidence, and argument structure. Firstly, from the amount of evidence, it can be said that Wennberg is for the position. In the text, he uses seventeen people who are for euthanasia out of 26 people. Especially, in the section of “Posing the Problems”, there are eight people who are for euthanasia out of nine people. He aims to make his opinion more strong and cogent by using more people who are in the side of the author than against. Secondly, the author’s comments on evidence represent that he thinks euthanasia should be allowed.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia: An Annotated Bibliography Keown, John. " Voluntary Euthanasia and Physicianassisted Suicide: Should the WMA Drop Its Opposition?. " World Medical Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 103-107.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alternatives to euthanasia can prevent putting too much power in other hands, and eliminate consequences in the future; therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized. Through the legalization of Euthanasia we will eventually enter a “slippery slope”. One of the biggest concerns with euthanasia is when to cross the line at who can receive euthanasia. As euthanasia progresses more laws and rules are being set to allow more people to receive euthanasia.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For James Rachels, as Barcalow says on page 252 of MP, “letting someone die is often no better from a moral point of view than killing someone.” Rachels challenges the view that killing someone, that is, via active euthanasia is far worse than letting someone die, that is, via passive euthanasia. Rachels thinks that sometimes even letting someone die can be far more worse than just outright killing them. To demonstrate his argument, Rachels gives a thought-experiment addressing this issue.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will summarize James Rachel’s argument on active versus euthanasia, and explain the examples he has written about to further explain it. After that I will summarize Thomas Sullivan’s objection. And at the end I will state my stance and conclusion on the subject. Rachels argument is on the difference between active and passive euthanasia and if that is really a distinction that needs to be made. He states in his introduction that active euthanasia is never allowed but passive euthanasia is sometimes allowed.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerald Dworkin Euthanasia

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physician-Assisted suicide is a popular debate topic amongst individuals who are medical practitioners, politicians or have had a related incident concerning a family member or friend. In the United States, patients are not assisted with suicide involving the physician, but with a pill intake. The practice of euthanasia is illegal throughout most of the United States except for Washington, Oregon, California, Vermont and Bernalillo County, New Mexico and Montana. Other countries around the world, specifically Switzerland, permit the physician to inject their patient to their death. The decision regarding patient suicide should be granted to the patient and one other family member or friend.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate rises on whether or not assisted suicide is ethical, legal and the best available option for those enduring misery and agony. According to Worsnop the debate that surrounds assisted suicide is divided equally between supporters and opponents of euthanasia. The compassionate…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My opposition to euthanasia being considered a medical treatment is the understanding that the intent of the physician should never be to kill, it ought to always be healing or curing a patient. However, there are cases where neither is possible and with the legalization of euthanasia, patients have a right to not suffer unnecessary pain and elect to die. In such cases, the aim should be to relieve the patient’s suffering, to do what is in the best interest of the patient, and respects the patient’s…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karen Anne Quinlan, Jack Kevorkian, names of common, everyday people who have, in recent years, become household words. Upon hearing the name Karen Anne Quinlan, ones mind is immediately taken to the bedside of the lifeless shell of what was once a full of life young woman. We see the straggles of a family who desire nothing more than to lay to rest the remains of their daughter. Jack Kevorkian, the "killer doctor," imprisoned for granting the requests of his terminal patients. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word euthanatos, which translates literally to mean good death.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Callahan feels that active euthanasia has no justifiable reason on why it would be right to legalize killing one another. Callahan objects to Rachels and Brock’s arguments for euthanasia. Rachels argument the value of self-determination justifies a right to voluntary active euthanasia. Callahan replies competent adults cannot consent to all things. Voluntary active euthanasia involves two parties the killer and the victim (Callahan pg. 626).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia In Canada

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introduction Is legalizing Euthanasia immoral? Unethical? Should it even be a topic of discussion? Jack Kevorkian a famous physician believes that euthanasia should be legalized as he states “dying is not a crime”. A big body of the Government of Canada would also approve euthanasia being legalized.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Euthanasia Pro

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imagine, you were just told you have 3 months to live because of a terrible illness. You think it's over and you will die in excruciating pain, but there's another peaceful way out called dr.assisted suicide. Euthanasia is a quick painless death that puts you asleep and you will calmly leave. It's only legal in 3 states and that's why dr. assisted suicide should be legal in all 50 states.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To ascertain whether euthanasia is morally permissible a great deal of reasoning is required, in “Euthanasia” Phillipa Foot lays out her logic for rationalizing the subject by providing several instances defending and disputing euthanasia. Foot takes the traditional definition of euthanasia, that exclusively specifies a particular manner of death, to encompass the grounds upon which an individual considers to come about making the choice to end their life. Foot holds the belief that euthanasia is morally justified when one's quality of life is so depleted that death would bring about the greatest amount of good for that one person involved. For something to be good, it must be beneficial for an individual in particular.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay-Williams stated that Euthanasia is unnatural because it works against a human’s self-interest. I feel like he is generalizing patients when he brought up that point because while there is a possibility of remission it is not the case for all patients. Additionally, he states that the practice of Euthanasia can lead to a ‘slippery slope’. A slippery slope is synonymous to the phrase “one thing led to another”. It is when one actions causes another action to take place.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The controversial debate on euthanasia is accompanied by a morally right or wrong argument. Through extensive and diverse research, I have discovered that both arguments of Euthanasia overall hold a numerous amount of valid arguments and facts. In Peter Bowal and Paulami Saha’s article, “Critiques of Assisted Suicide,” the authors discuss the Supreme Court of Case, Carter v Canada. The authors of this article defended with arguments against physician-assisted suicide. The article proposed many persuasive points that oppose the idea of assisted suicide.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays