Analysis I
In his article “Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement Use,” Robert D. Stuart discusses law enforcement officers' role when using social media. His claim is one of policy. Despite social media's advantages to share information, and the right of free expression, law enforcement agencies must set a standard for the officers regarding the information that is available to share in social media, in order to avoid dishonoring the institution and themselves. The warrants of his claim are that social media policies must protect government employees and people should be careful when using social media.
Stuart supports his claim with some examples about the expansion and the impact of social media on people's lives, particularly …show more content…
Moreover, he explains with a few specific examples how new words have been created by the use of different social networks, and how quickly they have achieved popularity. Stuart then related his previous example to indicate that most police officers choose to identify themselves as "law enforcement" in social media, which he supports thought a statistical evidence conducted by the Institute for Criminal Justice Education in 2011.
Stuart points out how beneficial social media is for law enforcement agencies when it is used as a tool to alert the communities of possible threats or to solve criminal cases. He supports the use of social media with a particular example where police investigators could identify a dead person's body by sharing photos via social media in 2011. In addition, Stuart mentions the amount of evidence or personal information posted by criminals in social media, which can be used as a support for investigation by law enforcement …show more content…
Her claim is that removing emergency contraception prohibitions is an excellent decision, which affects the lives of many women, when methods of pregnancy prevention have failed and where time is a critical factor. Her essay is a claim of value. The warrants of her essay are that emergency contraception is a safe and successful method of birth control; in addition, contraception should be more accessible to everyone.
Nucatola stated at the time of her essay a federal judge had recently decided to allow the commercial sale of emergency contraception for all ages, due to recently studies’ findings, proving its safety and efficiency.
Then, Nucatola appeals to freedom, giving an optimistic opinion about how important emergency contraception is for women used as a last resort to prevent unintentional pregnancy. She also points out the benefit of locating emergency contraception in commercial stores as a current
In his article “Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement Use,” Robert D. Stuart discusses law enforcement officers' role when using social media. His claim is one of policy. Despite social media's advantages to share information, and the right of free expression, law enforcement agencies must set a standard for the officers regarding the information that is available to share in social media, in order to avoid dishonoring the institution and themselves. The warrants of his claim are that social media policies must protect government employees and people should be careful when using social media.
Stuart supports his claim with some examples about the expansion and the impact of social media on people's lives, particularly …show more content…
Moreover, he explains with a few specific examples how new words have been created by the use of different social networks, and how quickly they have achieved popularity. Stuart then related his previous example to indicate that most police officers choose to identify themselves as "law enforcement" in social media, which he supports thought a statistical evidence conducted by the Institute for Criminal Justice Education in 2011.
Stuart points out how beneficial social media is for law enforcement agencies when it is used as a tool to alert the communities of possible threats or to solve criminal cases. He supports the use of social media with a particular example where police investigators could identify a dead person's body by sharing photos via social media in 2011. In addition, Stuart mentions the amount of evidence or personal information posted by criminals in social media, which can be used as a support for investigation by law enforcement …show more content…
Her claim is that removing emergency contraception prohibitions is an excellent decision, which affects the lives of many women, when methods of pregnancy prevention have failed and where time is a critical factor. Her essay is a claim of value. The warrants of her essay are that emergency contraception is a safe and successful method of birth control; in addition, contraception should be more accessible to everyone.
Nucatola stated at the time of her essay a federal judge had recently decided to allow the commercial sale of emergency contraception for all ages, due to recently studies’ findings, proving its safety and efficiency.
Then, Nucatola appeals to freedom, giving an optimistic opinion about how important emergency contraception is for women used as a last resort to prevent unintentional pregnancy. She also points out the benefit of locating emergency contraception in commercial stores as a current