Robert Harris Existentialism

Superior Essays
We live in a world where we are judged by our thoughts, behavior, and above all our actions. Every legal system is founded on the idea of laws and on our responsibility to choose to abide them. It’s this idea that as human beings we have full control of ourselves and of our actions. Human beings, as conscious beings, are held to a legal and moral standard and rightly so. As the branch of philosophy known as existentialism explains, all humans are “nothing”. There is no set or predetermined life path. A person has not only the ability but the obligation of creating and choosing their own life path. That is why in the case of Robert Harris, a person who individually chose his life path, he is fully responsible and guilty of his crimes. It is known that at the time of the crime, Robert Harris was alone with the two victims. Robert Harris had his weapon in hand and a mind ready to make a decision. One of the most important and fascinating elements of humans and existentialism is this ability to decide. You see, the simple concept of deciding implies that there are multiple choices. One might even think that there would be …show more content…
They would claim that by assessing the causes in Harris’ life they would have been able of foreseeing him commit murder. After all, he grew up in an awful environment and he was a very troubled child. He also would appear to have been following his “set life path” for quite some years. Harris began killing and mutilating animals at a young age, so what followed was simply one of the many results from the causes and effects that had been occurring in Harris’ life since it began. With determinism there seems to be this idea that everything that happens in life is caused by something that happened before it. It’s this endless and infinite sequence of explanations. However, this can be a quite dangerous way of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I am writing to you regarding your article about the execution of Robert Harris who murdered two young guys for no reason. In my opinion, Harris deserved to die because he had very aggressive behaviour. Murdering people is not a good thing and he had to die. He didn’t deserve even the life imprisonment because it is very expensive to keep him alive. I am shocked at your anti-death penalty attitude, demonstrated in your article ‘I see a killer die’.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Innocence Project Organization more than 20,000 innocent people are currently serving time in prison. The Billy Glaze and Andre Hatchett cases are two of thousands in which one can lead one to see the faults in the United States court system. By analyzing the case details, what happened during the investigation, and what stood out during the trial and investigation of both cases, one can conclude that our criminal justice system truly is flawed. Billy Glaze is a man who even lost his life in prison. Andre Hatchett was able to be freed but not until he already served 25 years in prison.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Douglas J. Pettiford Stanley “Tookie” Williams CRIMINOLOGY July, 6 2015 The life of a gang member is a harsh one that often leads to imprisonment or death. Many who embrace gang life do so to fill emptiness or void in their life. Gang leadership frequently offers to fill that void, under the pretense of fellowship and family. Those who do accept the call gain a sense of power and belonging.…

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ronald Cotton Legal Case

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The American legal system is widely admired for its laudable moral qualities such as liberty, justice, and due process. Americans take great pride in seeing the legal system administer swift and fair penalties to those who have committed crimes. But what happens if the legal system is wrong? What if the person that was sent to prison, or executed by the state, did not commit the crime they were punished for? This was the situation that Ronald Cotton found himself in during the 1980s and 90s serving a life sentence for two rapes he did not commit.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Cold Blood Analysis

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It’s a difficult call for many individuals about whether or not to punish individuals or help them become a better person. While some crimes are inexcusable and lead to life in jail or even the death penalty so can more petty crimes which brings up the case as to whether or not both groups of individuals belong in the same place and if they deserve a chance to be brought back into society. In the Ted Talk by Adam Foss about a prosecutor 's view on the justice system, Foss explains how many individuals can correct themselves and move on to a new path of life. Similarly, Jessica S. Henry explained how the justice system is also flawed and how individuals can be helped and how the process can be improved. The justice system is flawed and that…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reason Of Insanity For Andrew and Abby Borden, life was ideal. Their daughters flourished in a household that was looked upon as one of happiness, comfort, and love as they taught Sunday School every weekend. Their lives were those that others envy. It was for this reason that outside observers were quite astounded when Lizzie Borden bludgeoned her parents to death with an axe. This goes to show, when faced with untreated illness alongside neglect and abuse by loved ones, the verdict of acquittal in the controversial court case of Fall River vs. Lizzie Borden made sense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Greg Miller’s Wired article “Did Brain Scans Just Save a Convicted Murderer From the Death Penalty?”, John McCluskey, a prisoner escaped from an Arizona prison, carjacked a retired couple, shot them inside the camping trailer they were towing behind their truck and set the trailer on fire with their bodies still inside. Despite his reprehensible act of crime, John McCluskey’s lawyers successfully convinced the jury that the convict has several brain defects and that his action was a result of his impulsiveness as he is incapable of planning such things in advance. As a result, the jury decided that they had been unable to come to a consensus on the death penalty, in other words, John McCluskey is getting a life sentence without parole. 

Suppose…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In today’s Canadian society, people are certain that the Criminal justice system with their almighty position and power has the responsibility to protect and serve the community. That being said, the fundamental purpose of the creation of criminal law is to maintain order within society and punish those who deviate beyond the social and legal norms (Robinson & Cahill, 2005). The idea of an innocent individual being wrongfully convicted of a criminal act committed by another person is astounding. The sole purpose of the system is to restrain those who are deemed deviant or mischiefs and are to be held accountable for their actions through the criminal justice system. Therefore, not to restrain the freedom of the individuals who are innocent.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marley Lyster PHIL 1000 Assignment 2 Prompt 2 Susan Wolf’s compatibilist predisposition evaluates moral responsibility with her “Deep Self View.” Not only does she argue that events can be fully fixed and determined and one can have some freedom in action, but also that the agent only has moral responsibility in these actions if they are in control of their deepest desires (Wolf, 460). After presenting this view, Wolf uses her example of JoJo to demonstrate a hole in her own Deep Self View that can be patched by the addition of a sanity clause (Wolf, 462). Should her compatibilist view be accepted, the sanity clause does justly remedy the blatant weakness JoJo reveals in her Deep Self View to resolve her argument’s inadequacy.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America today, we face several problems with our judicial system. Our judicial system sometimes is not fair to people when it comes to their acts and crimes they have committed. For example, a person could murder someone and have less time in prison than someone who were trafficking drugs. This is not fair at all. The court systems today need to look at where people are coming from.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have all been in a situation where we were wrongly accused and blamed by the guilty. We have all been through this. We get assessed by people who determine what we’re like without actually ever knowing who they actually are. In extreme situations these people could take the weight of another person's actions. Resulting in someone else paying the time for their crime.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects of wrongful conviction are commonly underrepresented in the Criminal Justice System. According to the Innocence project (2014), more than 1,300 individuals in the United States that were convicted of crimes have been exonerated and cleared of all charges brought against them. Errors consist of misleading eyewitness testimony, confessions that are coerced, criminal investigators getting tunnel vision, and corruption of prosecutors. Of the many difficulties exonerates face compensation, due to the state, impacted against them is often understated. Many face difficulties with finding employment, healthcare, and housing.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have also agreed on punishments or responses when a person breaks one or more of the laws. If we, as a society agree in punishment for breaking laws, then we, as a society must believe in free will. Humans must have free will or we are punishing people for actions for which they had no control. There cannot be moral responsibility if everything is determined, as the responsibility would not fall on the human, but rather the force that made the predetermination.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is free will compatible with determinism? That’s the most philosophical question asked. Free will is the power or ability to make a choice for which one can be held responsible for. Determinism is the thesis that at any time the universe has one physically possibility in the future. Compatibilisim is the thesis that we can have free will in a deterministic world.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss classical criminology, commonly referred to as classicism. The first part of this essay will clarify the main features and concepts of classicism, including rational choice theory, free will, social contract theory, deterrence, and proportional punishment. This essay will then further analyse these theories and identify any limitations and problems associated with them. This will give a better understanding towards the concepts that surround criminology. Classicism emerged and developed in Europe in the late eighteenth century (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2002).…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics