The purpose of this memo is to delineate the revisions needed to Robert Harad’s letter of appreciation.
Summary:
Robert Harad’s letter of appreciation to Ronald O’Shea is too vague. There is no way to identify who wrote this letter if Ronald does not remember the name and face. The letter need more details about the experience.
Discussion:
The letter of appreciation Robert wrote is too short and lack essential details. There is nothing differentiate the writer. Although concise letters in the workplace are preferred, they should not be this brief. The writer details of the letter should include the conversation he had with Ronald and what he experienced when he was showed around the plant.
Another key issue with the letter of appreciation
Summary:
Robert Harad’s letter of appreciation to Ronald O’Shea is too vague. There is no way to identify who wrote this letter if Ronald does not remember the name and face. The letter need more details about the experience.
Discussion:
The letter of appreciation Robert wrote is too short and lack essential details. There is nothing differentiate the writer. Although concise letters in the workplace are preferred, they should not be this brief. The writer details of the letter should include the conversation he had with Ronald and what he experienced when he was showed around the plant.
Another key issue with the letter of appreciation