About twenty years ago, excavators that were digging on North Carolina’s remote Hatteras Island came across a worn ring emblazoned with a lion that was prancing. A local jeweler claimed that the ring was created with gold, but it turns out said ring was seen as more than just treasure that was buried when a British heraldry expert connected it to the Kendall family that was involved in the fifteen-eighties Roanoke voyagers. The ring, discovered in nineteen-ninety-eight, seemed a rare remnant of the first attempt by the English to settle in America. This could possibly help uncover this mystery that is of one hundred and fifteen disappearing men, women, and children who settled the coast. Turns out, researchers had it incorrect from the very beginning. A team that was led by archaeologist Charles Ewen recently put the ring through a lab test at East Carolina University. They used a x-ray fluorescence device, which reveals an object’s exact elemental composition without destroying ay part of it. Ewen’s reaction was a stunned one when he founded the results. There were high levels of copper with some zinc and traces of silver, lead, tin, and nickel. These metal rations were typical of brass from early modern times. There was zero evidence found that the ring had gilding on the surface of it; this threw a plethora of years of speculation and research into serious doubt.
About twenty years ago, excavators that were digging on North Carolina’s remote Hatteras Island came across a worn ring emblazoned with a lion that was prancing. A local jeweler claimed that the ring was created with gold, but it turns out said ring was seen as more than just treasure that was buried when a British heraldry expert connected it to the Kendall family that was involved in the fifteen-eighties Roanoke voyagers. The ring, discovered in nineteen-ninety-eight, seemed a rare remnant of the first attempt by the English to settle in America. This could possibly help uncover this mystery that is of one hundred and fifteen disappearing men, women, and children who settled the coast. Turns out, researchers had it incorrect from the very beginning. A team that was led by archaeologist Charles Ewen recently put the ring through a lab test at East Carolina University. They used a x-ray fluorescence device, which reveals an object’s exact elemental composition without destroying ay part of it. Ewen’s reaction was a stunned one when he founded the results. There were high levels of copper with some zinc and traces of silver, lead, tin, and nickel. These metal rations were typical of brass from early modern times. There was zero evidence found that the ring had gilding on the surface of it; this threw a plethora of years of speculation and research into serious doubt.