Riley Vs. California Case Analysis

Improved Essays
What is the standard for law enforcement to search your cell phone? Well the Supreme Court states that the police must get search warrants for most cell phone searches, not all (Supreme Court Searches”, 2014). Two cases linked to the Supreme Court decision would be the Riley v. California and U.S. v. Wurie. In the Riley v. California case, Riley was pulled over for a traffic violation. Riley was driving a different car than what was registered to him and he was driving around on suspended license registration tags. Also Riley was driving around on a suspended license. Following procedure, the car must be impounded, but before its impounded the car is allowed to be searched for an inventory search. During the inventory search, police found two guns, which led to Riley being arrested on possession of firearms. Law enforcement had already been watching Riley, thinking that he was involved in gang related activities. While Riley was under arrest, police confiscated his phone. The police had a gang unit detective go through Riley’s phone, and the detective did find that Riley was gang affiliated. Riley had videos and photos of gang related things stored on his phone. Law enforcement was able to connect Riley to a shooting, which led to separate charges that included, attempted murder, assault with a semi-automatic weapon, and shooting at an occupied vehicle. Riley was convicted all …show more content…
Right now, it’s not hard for law enforcement to obtain anyone’s emails. All law enforcement has to do is go to your email provider and state that they are doing an investigation. Law enforcement can obtain opened and unopened emails that are past 180 days old with just a subpoena. Due to the current law, many are stating that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), is outdated. The ECPA was put into place in 1986. With law enforcement having this much access, it doesn’t make anyone’s emails that

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I too think that having a gun on school grounds is a serious crime. In the case of United Sates v. Lopez it should have only been up to the state to punish him, but that wasn't the case. Lopez's crime should not have been punishable under the Commerce Crime and that was exactly what the ruling upheld. The Commerce Crime had nothing to do with the Gun Free School Zone Act and therefore it was unconstitutional. Great discussion.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ¬¬___ (2012). Parties: United States, Plaintiff / Appellant Antoine Jones, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Antoine Jones was a nightclub owner in the District of Columbia that was arrested in 2005 for drug possession after the police attached a GPS tracker to his vehicle. The tracker was attached to the vehicle because Jones was under suspicion of narcotics trafficking. The GPS tracker was authorized for use on the vehicle belonging to Jones’ wife although Jones was the primary driver. However, the police failed to comply with the warrant’s deadline and installed the GPS tracker on the vehicle anyway.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The State Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, as well as upheld the decisions of the lower courts.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Fearon Case Study

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Police authorities momentarily became involved. F and C were arrested incident to the locating of the vehicle. When the pat-down procedure was conducted on F, a cell phone was found and retained as evidence for the trial against the accused. The police subsequently conducted a search of the cell phone and once more within two hours of the arrest.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Rose, 3 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: Affirmative Action and Racial Quotas Abby Rose Liberty High School 3AB The famous court case of Regents of the University of CA v. Bakke has been a controversial court case dealing with affirmative action. Affirmative action usually is defined as special privileges or policies that favor a minority group or race. Even though the defendant, Allan Bakke, may have scored higher than some of the minorities that applied, he still did not get in because of his skin color. The university was picking students based on a racial quota, and the white quota for the university was met, that is why Bakke did not get accepted.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    R v. Gonzales refers to a criminal case of a triple parricide by twenty year old Australian BOS: 28744455 Sef Gonzales which occurred on the 10th of July 2001. Sef’s motives for killing his father Teddy, Mother Mary Loiva and sister Clodine derived from his parent’s unattainable high expectations of him and his desire to financially benefit from their death. Having premeditated his crime, Sef entered Clodine’s room at 4pm armed with two kitchen knifes and a baseball bat and killed her. The cause of her death was the combined effect of the compression of her neck, the blunt force injuries and abdominal stab wounds. Sef’s mother arrived home an hour later and was ambushed in the living room by Sef, stabbing her multiple times, severing her windpipe.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Baker v Carr, the majority made up the basis for asserting jurisdiction because the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, did not give it the power to do so. The Constitution never mentioned anything regarding state election procedure, other than that it could not hinder any legal rights of its citizens as mentioned in the Constitution and that the number of representatives per state were to be determined by state population. Therefore, the Constitution never mentioned that federal courts had the jurisdiction to hear constitutional questions to regarding state elections; the majority simply made that up in order to hear the case. There is no branch of federal government that specializes in redistricting. Since representatives' political…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the witnesses were brought in for questioning including the worker at drug store, the man who rented the car Nathan, and the person who made a bank account under fake name Morton Ballard. All the witnesses testified against Nathan and…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greenwood. Mr. Greenwood then posted bail, or a certain amount to be released from incarceration to insure court appearances, and was released from jail during the pendency of his criminal case. During this time the police received information that Mr. Greenwood was again using and selling drugs at his home. The police once again conducted a search of his trash and found evidence and received a second search warrant based on this evidence to search his home. Once inside they found more narcotics and Mr. Greenwood was arrested again.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issue Under the California Civil Code § 3344, will former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger be able to suppress images from his storied career being used on T-Shirts sold by Newsflash Creative Media on the grounds that the images have violated his right of publicity in the state of California? Conclusion Yes. Former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will be able to suppress the images being used on the T-Shirts sold by Newsflash Creative Media under the California Civil Code § 3344 because Code prohibits the use of a person’s “photograph or likeness … on or in products … for the purposes of advertising or selling … without such person’s consent …” The images have not been sufficiently “transformed” into something unique and original enough to…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You get pulled over by the police and they arrest you over several suspicions, the police start checking you and eventually they land on your phone, they take it and start sifting through it? Has this officer gone too far? I don't think so, I think that officials should be able to use information they obtained from private devices or social networking sites in order to protect the community. What if the person the police had arrested was actually a bad person, if they search his phone they might find crucial information to convict the person. As explained in the article Phone Patrol “...Officers are allowed to ‘open and examine’ what they find on an arrested person, without a warrant”.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Daniel Zwerdling states in his article, that “you can't claim that information is private" (NPR) If it has been shared with companies that hold the e such as phone companies, electric companies, etc. The government justifies the examination and seizure of personal records with this argument. As a result, with this view of the Fourth Amendment, the U.S. government has been able to conduct multiple investigations, including some that are relevant to terrorism and others that are…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Digital Privacy Case Study

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position as Director of CIA, David H. Petraeus”. Since the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency was not able to keep his personal digital content private, can anyone expect their email to be protected from law enforcement without a warrant? Why should anyone have to face such embarrassment about their personal life when it’s not affecting their career? Whether there’s enough protection against obtaining someone information has always been a huge debate with digital privacy. Finding that the director of CIA was having an affair can be seen as a small offense, but what if information was obtained showing that he has been…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays