Rights Of Ordinary Shareholders

Decent Essays
The ordinary shareholders are having the following rights in respect of shares held by them:

1. Right to vote:

As the ordinary shareholders of a company are its owners, they are entitled to elect the board of directors. The board, in turn, select the management and management actually controls the operations of the company. This right to vote is not confined to mere election of directors; however, it covers a large number of issues like the amendment of memorandum of association or articles of association, adoption of the schemes of consolidations and mergers, alteration of the authorized capital, etc.

2. Right to income:

The ordinary shareholders are entitled to share in the earnings of the company only if cash dividends are paid. The declaration of cash dividends depends entirely upon the board of directors. This aspect reveals the basic difference between the rights of an ordinary shareholder and rights of a creditor. In case the company fails to pay the contractual interest and principal repayments the creditors can take legal action to assume that payment is made or the company is liquidated. Ordinary shareholders, on the other hand, have no legal recourse to a company for not declaring cash dividends or for not distributing the profits. They are entitled for cash dividends only when it is recommended and declared by the board of directors. However, if the management, the board of directors or both are engaged in fraud in not declaring cash dividends the shareholders can take their case to the court and force the company to pay the dividends.
…show more content…
Right against ultra vires acts of the company:

The management or board of directors is empowered to carry on only such acts or operations specified in the memorandum of association of a company. If they perform any act or operation beyond this memorandum is considered as ultra wires acts. These ultra wire acts are a breach of the agreement between the company and the shareholders. Therefore, a shareholder may properly bring legal action in order to prevent the companies from engaging in them.

04. The preemptive

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The veil of incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate directors, officers and employees for actions taken by the business. However, business owners can still be liable for business activities if they failed to follow corporate guidelines, commingled assets or acted recklessly (eHow,2015). The courts typically do not look behind the veil of incorporation if there a separate legal entity. But in certain circumstances, the court is willing to ‘lift the veil of incorporation’. The courts will lift the veil of corporation where the justice of the case demands or if the veil has been misused, this mean that a people who is controlling a company misused the veil to the prejudiced of creditors or third parties.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Shadow Director Case Study

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Failure to comply may render the directors or connected persons , including shadow directors, liable to account for any profit or loss to the company. In Smithton Ltd v Naggar , Court ruled that the person cannot be a shadow director since he did not wear the hat of the subsidiary’s director for the protested acts. 5.0 Conclusion This research paper is meant to demonstrate the evolution of laws in relation to shadow directors’ liabilities. Courts are imposing on shadow directors the fiduciary duties owed by de jure directors to avoid abuses in relation to the affairs of the company, protect company’s members and avoid the corporate structure to be used as a device for fraud. Legislations and judicial decisions are evolving with the purpose of clarifying the liability of the shadow directors such that it becomes more difficult to escape liability.…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the facts of cases, the minority shareholder has sued them on the profit that they have made. The issues here, whether the company can ratifies the diversion of contract. The court held is they cannot…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That is for the shareholders and the directors” . From this statement we can understand that the control and power of a company is vested in the shareholders. Normally things are dealt by vote. So the majority shareholders have the majority voting powers which gives them the control of the company. This narrows down the rights of the minority.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The investor would have to prove that they relied on the information but they don’t have to prove that it was the defendants fault. The defense for this would be good faith (acting without scienter)that I had no knowledge that the statement was false or misleading. I had no idea about the overstating of the net sales and net profits or the siphoning of profits by the company President, but he did notice suspicious entries he believed to be bribes that he didn’t investigate further. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) b. Reginald Varghese would not be found liable under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 act. Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Defects LLC is applicable provided that the shareholders and the company personality independent and separated from each other. If shareholders do not respect the company 's personality, contrary to the "separation principle", it could lead to abuse at any time and away from the original intention of the limited liability company 's legal system, to the detriment of the interests of creditors of the company and social welfare. The risk of abuse of limited liability that may occur at any time, in particular: Firstly, limited liability company has the potential to abuse the personality, in violation of the principle of separation of ownership and management rights dimension level, illegal manipulation of the minority shareholders in its individual…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unit 1: Sole Contractorship

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just like the sole proprietorship, the partnership is 100% liable and creditors may go after business assets, or personal assets of either or both partners. • INCOME TAXES – Taxed like a sole proprietor where each partner pays taxes on their income from the business like it was there personal income, and expenses may be written off to offset business expenses. Since the partnership is also not considered a separate entity, the business is taxed only once. • LONGEVITY/CONTINUITY – Once a partner exits the business or dies, it is dissolved and a new business form must be created in order for the business to continue operating. • CONTROL – Partners have equal control in all decision making and operations of the business.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As we know, directors are appointed by shareholders to manage a business. According to the law, directors have general power of management and members cannot override the decisions of the board. Directors have great power to control business activities. The law designs a series of directors’ duties to make sure the directors manage the company responsibly basic on interests of the company. However, whether those duties are effective in legal practice is a debate.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, if directors underperform, they may be dismissed and new contracts must be evaluated and approved before being legally binding. Shareholders are also able to select an external auditor to ensure transparency. Directors may run the business but shareholders own it and possess all the power. – Upon violation of their rights, shareholders can utilise their right to sue. This would be directed towards the company and is used as a remedy to alleviate corruption whilst ensuring that directors perform with the best interests of the business and stakeholders at large.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this instance, the issue is whether the directors of the company XYZ Co. Ltd are responsible for the breach of the insolvent trading and is there any defence available to them under Corporation act. Section 588 G says that, Directors have a statuary duty to prevent insolvent trading of a company. See Austin & Black’s Annotations to the Corporations Act . The duty of the directors are breached when these four conditions are seen firstly, person is a director of the company or someone he/she is not the director of the company but still act a director by taking part in the duties which are assigned to the directors like shadow directors who are retired directors but still taking part in the meeting and…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays