Legalization Of Euthanasia Essay: Rightful Suicide

Improved Essays
Rightful Suicide
“You have a choice. Live or die. Every breath is a choice. Every minute is a choice” (Palahniuk). People will terminal illnesses face excruciating pain all the time. They take drugs after drugs, but nothing seems to cure or at least ease the person’s pain. Some eventually get tired of living with the agony, so they consider the idea of suicide or euthanasia. Euthanasia often carries a negative implication, for some people think of it as murder. While others see it as putting a patient to death without pain or suffering. People debate over the patients wanting to end their life, for some are for it while others think it is not the right decision to make. If drugs and treatments cannot cure the patient then it should be their decision if they want to continue being alive or end their life. I myself am for it. Their suicide will stop their suffering, reduce financial debt of the hospital, and preserve individual right to determine fate.
First, the patient is in so much agony because of the illness that they
…show more content…
They believe that if voluntary euthanasia would be legalized, it would not be long until involuntary euthanasia would begin. When euthanasia was legalized in the Netherlands in 1990, “eight thousand and one hundred died when doctors deliberately gave them an overdose of pain medication to kill them for which four thousand and nine hundred forty one patients didn’t consent”( Ertelt). However, many of the physicians assisting this procedure without consent did it with the families consent. The patient depending on the state he or she is in may not be able to make decisions for one. The immediate family would then be the one that would need to be the ones that are going to make the decisions for them. The whole decision should not be based on something that was taken out of context. That is why euthanasia should be legalized and should not be seen as a bad

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I feel that the decision should be up to the terminally ill patient’s family on whether they should die by the use of certain medicines instead of natural causes. I don’t feel it’s right to be up to the doctor or the patient because sometimes patients get misdiagnosed. Richard Brant mentions that euthanasia is a way of relieving the pain someone is feeling and defines suicide as doing something that results in one’s death. Moreover, Dan Brock argues that euthanasia is not a bad thing especially active euthanasia. Daniel Callahan is against euthanasia because he thinks it will leads in the wrong direction.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human beings everywhere experience pain, suffering, and ultimately death. Many people are considered fortunate when they undergo a quick, relatively painless death, such as when they die in their sleep. However, others endure agonizing pain over a long period of time before dying. There is an ongoing debate over whether it is permissible to end these people’s lives if they have no hope of improving their conditions or have no desire to continue fighting their symptoms.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In today’s society, one of the many controversial issues discussed is physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. There have been many questions and opinions concerning the incident, and as a result, some people have been criticized for their opinions of physician-assisted suicide. Many have debated about what is wrong and right yet, none of us actually know what is best for society. Furthermore, we ask ourselves, “Should patients have the right to die? Should we agree to the patient’s request regardless if they want to die based on emotional/mentally reasons, their fear of becoming weak, or their condition?”…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    we hi no he hi n For terminally ill patients, their only hope is to minimize the negative effects of symptoms from their life ending diseases. For these terminally ill patients, treatment is not to find a cure, but to make the patient as comfortable as possible. This is where physician assisted suicide plays a role in the life cycle. If a terminally ill patient is given less than six months to live, they should be able to choose how they die.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although this is true, the patient is choosing to participate knowing all the risks and the possibility of failure. Another point of these groups and people who do not support physician assisted death could be the emotional strain on physicians and nurses. Any physician or nurse would not legally have to administer these lethal drugs if they believe it is against their religion, or code of ethics. Although “The American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for nurses with interpretive statements (2001) identified the expectation that nurses provide interventions to relieve pain and suffering of the dying patient, even if they may hasten death” (Lachman 124). This shows that even their code of ethics would allow for them to assist in the death of a terminally ill and mentally competent patient who is likely to die within the next twelve…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An argument for justice can also be made for the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Justice requires that we treat like cases alike with the quality of being reasonable and fair. Competent, terminally ill patients have the legal right to refuse medications and treatment that will prolong their lives. Clients who are depending of interventions such as dialysis are able to choose to discontinue these services. Therefore, in order to treat clients equitably, clients must be allowed to make the decision to end their lives by means of assisted…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many issues regarding the legalization of assisted suicide. Medical doctors are trained and trusted to save lives, not take them, that leads many to question all doctors if so many are willing to assist in ending the lives of their patients. Medical doctors are sworn in using the Hippocratic Oath in which they promise to save lives to the best of their abilities. If we question the act of physician-assisted suicide it is legally and morally unethical. For example, if an individual is determined to take their life and a friend hands them a gun instructing them to kill themselves, the person giving them the means to carry out the act is just as responsible as the individual committing the act itself.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a person’s life is approaching its end under a hospital 's care they have the choice to control their pain and other symptoms. They also can receive religious, psychological, and social support. Because a person has the control over their pain, they have control over whether or not to take their medicine. The medicine they can choose whether or not to take can be sustaining their life so they essential are choosing life or death. If they chose not to take the medicine they would go through intense amounts of pain before they died.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide is one of the most controversial ethics topics in society today. Many believe that physician assisted suicide should be legalized across the U.S because of the positive impact it could have on those with terminal illness who want to avoid prolonged suffering in hospice care. Suicide with a medical professionals assistance is also justifiable as a person 's right because it in no way affects or endangers another person 's rights. If physician assisted suicide is legal for those who are mentally competent it could relieve pain for not only the person but their loved ones. On the other hand, it becomes debatable when taken into terms of religious and moral beliefs, many disagree with those who believe that it…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons behind Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted suicide (PAS) claim that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death (Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?). The right to die is every human’s choice. Choosing Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide can provide a terminally ill patient with a good end. It can also make it easier on the patients’ family knowing that they chose that it was their time to go. When choosing Euthanasia, the patient is showing strength and dignity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benefits Of Euthanasia

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “I’d rather be dead than be in a wheelchair, or need a respirator to help me breathe” ("Right to Die: Should Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Be Legal). Terminally ill patients often state they’d be better off dead. Euthanasia is a quiet, painless death used for terminally ill patients. Terminally ill patients are those patients who cannot be cured and are already at great risk of dying. Terminally ill patients only have a life expectancy of six months or less.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This choice is often considered in patients who are diagnosed with illnesses that medical interventions will not be able to cure, but rather only prolong one’s life by treating the pain. It is imperative that we legalize euthanasia as a medical practice that allows medical professionals to help grant their patient 's last wishes. There are two types of euthanasia, the first of which is active euthanasia. This is the process in which a person gives their consent to end their life. Medical professionals attending to their patients would provide the patient with either a lethal dose of medicine or a prescription for a lethal amount to do in their own time.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays