Right to work The Right to Work was just instated in Missouri and a lot of Union workers are against it. Right to Work is not for Missouri and gives the government too much power in companies that were doing just fine without them. Right to work is a huge waste of time, and it is a huge money loss for workers that already have a hard enough time making a living.
Right to work [RTW] is disliked by most of the union workers. It takes away thousands of dollars and makes workers work longer hours. Many union workers dislike it because it takes away around $5,000 per year. On average that's $20.00a day loss for Union workers. Many people think the union is useless and that they shouldn't have to work for the union, but in reality the union …show more content…
They also don’t pay for education like the Union does, which means that the works have to pay for their own education taking more money out of their already money loss from the change to RTW states. RTW states have a higher injury rate than Non Right to Work states. So That means that They lose even more money after the fact that they lost 5,000 a year pay cut. Right to work cost even more money because the don't pay for schooling or medical bills if your hurt at work. Workers still have to purchase the Right to Work to represent them. That shows that the Right to Work is not really that different from the Union , but makes you lose money so what's the …show more content…
23 out of the 50 states have switched to RTW. RTW leads to more competitive bidding and wages. RTW states have substantially greater personal income economic growth rates than non RTW states. Also they are trying to keep the wages more fair than the Union.If you want to work for a union that is your choice. The state should not have the power to enforce such a useless law. Many things are ok about right to work ,though. I believe that the more competitive wages are ok, and it would be a good thing. The Union will for most people be the best option compared to right to
Right to work [RTW] is disliked by most of the union workers. It takes away thousands of dollars and makes workers work longer hours. Many union workers dislike it because it takes away around $5,000 per year. On average that's $20.00a day loss for Union workers. Many people think the union is useless and that they shouldn't have to work for the union, but in reality the union …show more content…
They also don’t pay for education like the Union does, which means that the works have to pay for their own education taking more money out of their already money loss from the change to RTW states. RTW states have a higher injury rate than Non Right to Work states. So That means that They lose even more money after the fact that they lost 5,000 a year pay cut. Right to work cost even more money because the don't pay for schooling or medical bills if your hurt at work. Workers still have to purchase the Right to Work to represent them. That shows that the Right to Work is not really that different from the Union , but makes you lose money so what's the …show more content…
23 out of the 50 states have switched to RTW. RTW leads to more competitive bidding and wages. RTW states have substantially greater personal income economic growth rates than non RTW states. Also they are trying to keep the wages more fair than the Union.If you want to work for a union that is your choice. The state should not have the power to enforce such a useless law. Many things are ok about right to work ,though. I believe that the more competitive wages are ok, and it would be a good thing. The Union will for most people be the best option compared to right to