Right To Die Summary

Improved Essays
In the article “The Case for the ‘Right to Die’ from The Chicago Tribune, the authors position was initially one of caution and hesitation, but then becomes one of full support for assisted suicide. The audience is nationwide, but specifically addresses whether or not California should pass legislation allowing for physician-assisted suicide, so it targets Californians in particular. The purpose is to persuade people that California should recognize a “right to die” and to help people better understand the many benefits and few drawbacks of such legislation. The author states, “Instead of being devastating and far-reaching, it [assisted suicide] appears to be modest but beneficial in its effects”. The author’s perspective is fairly liberal

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Medical arguments against assisted dying include the possibility of misdiagnosis, the potential availability of new treatments, and conflict with the physician’s role as a healer. Farr Curlin’s study shows 69 percent of U.S. physicians are against physician assisted suicide (Curlin). In an article “Why Physicians Should Oppose Assisted Suicide” Tony Yang says “…with physician-assisted-suicide, the physician is to disregard what is perhaps the most universal moral injunction – do not kill…” Yang uses Brittany Maynard’s case to highlight his opinion that she ended her life prematurely based on her fear of physical pain, self-determination and her wish to avoid dependency. With respect to assisted-suicide, he views “the right to die” as irony for the alleged “right to have a physician help me kill myself” (Yang).…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is for the Writer to examine and analyze methodology and legalities of ending one’s life options and ethical foundations surrounding the right to life targeting the following areas of concerns: 1) Physician Assisted- Suicide; and 2) Pro-life Proponent arguments. Background This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ryan T. Anderson's article titled “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” begins with Anderson setting the stage of the idea of Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) being introduced with stories of patients diagnosed with terrible diseases. Anderson describes the act of eighteen states considering legalizing PAS a “grave mistake”, and describes a more merciful alternative of doctors giving patients the means to ease their pain as they await their demise. Anderson also quotes Victoria Reggie Kennedy, who believes that most people would prefer a death surrounded by loved ones, and a PAS would be cold, unloving and extreme. Anderson also claims that this would be contrary to the Hippocratic Oath and that nobody should be legally allowed to kill…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Recent stories in the news have posed this controversial question: should terminally ill patients have the right to end their own lives? Empathetic stories of terminally ill patients’ last wishes have captured attention of the media and created a controversial debate on the ethics and morals of physician assisted suicide, otherwise known as PAS. Some claim that PAS is inhumane and unethical, while others insist that it is a given right to anybody under such extreme circumstances. In his article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong,” Ryan T. Anderson attempts to convey to citizens and policymakers that legalizing PAS across the country would be a grave mistake. However, Anderson’s argument is weak due to a series of logical fallacies…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans are taught from an early age that everyone is born with certain unalienable rights. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are characterized as legal truths that cannot be taken away or denied. However, one must wonder if the right to life coincides with the right to die. This is the very question that has sparked controversy all throughout the nation regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS). To clarify, the right to die is a person’s decision to end their life with the medical help and guidance from their doctor.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States is currently in a rut of anti-progressivism. In few areas is this reality more evident than in the popular objection to physician-assisted suicide. Physician assisted suicide, for the sake of argument, is the opportunity given to an individual suffering from terminal illness to end his own life quickly and painlessly by means of prescribed drugs. The practice provides relief for those under immense pain and suffering, but is a sensitive issue to argue in favor of, particularly because of its unwholesome connotation. However, Physician Assisted Suicide is defended by US Standards of Law and Medicine and should therefore be legal throughout the United States for patients with a terminal illness and life expectancy of 6 months or less.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the case with this paper, I, the writer has a bias when it comes to the right to die movement. I was born and raised Christian, specifically Lutheran. I believe we were a little bit more at ease with some subjects, but there is a slight shame placed upon suicide. However, as I have grown and seen the world for what it is, I have some differing stances. The church preaches ‘thou shall not kill’, which implies the obvious rejection of murder, but it is also applied to suicide.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topics of Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide are troubling ones for many. Some believe that it is immoral to kill off their loved ones, some support it, and others are not quite sure what to think. Euthanasia is defined as the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering from an incurable illness; Physician Assisted Suicide is defined as the voluntary termination of one’s life using lethal substances with the help of a doctor, directly or indirectly. A doctor gives the patient suffering from an incurable illness a lethal injection which then induces the painless death. Right now only 5 states states have legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been many controversies over whether physician ­assisted suicide should be legal or not. Many people believe that it is morally wrong and should be unconstitutional. Individuals who support physician assisted suicide argue that it cuts costs, ends pain and suffering, and is not morally wrong. Physician­ assisted suicide is a controversial procedure that should be accepted, legally and morally as it is cost saving, and eliminates suffering from individual’s lives. If legalized, physician ­assisted suicide has “potential cost savings” (Emanuel, 1998, p. 1).…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Opponents say that difficult decisions are supposed to be made, by one’s self, family, and a physician, about a life that is at an end and should be allowed to be let go. It is not for the government to decide when the plug should be pulled or for a death pill to be administered. While opponents argue medically assisted suicide is unethical and will lead society down a slippery slope, proponents argue that it is ethically permissible, and is “the ultimate civil right” and not to let mentally competent, terminally ill patients who want to end their pain and suffering in a peaceful manner, is disrespectful to their right to personal autonomy. But the more modern day medicine and technology continue to pull people from the brink of death, more and more people will be asking for the right to end their lives, because extending the length of life, allows time for more people to become terminally ill and be in pain. Virtually all people want their loved ones to remember them as they once were, not what they could become in the years following the diagnosis of a terminally illness.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Prior to conducting my research in respects to whether or not I supported a patient’s right to die. I knew my standpoint; yes I do support a patient’s right to die. However I was very surprised to know that only five states within the United States have legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide. Working in health care and seeing firsthand the pain and suffering that some patients go thru. One does think, would I want to go thru what this person is going thru.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sidney Hook Analysis

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Right to Judge There are not many issues more personal or controversial than assisted suicide. Watching a family member in pain or critical health conditions can be extremely heartbreaking, especially for a terminal illness. Hence, if there is no more hope or patient simply give up, what is the next step? Assisted suicide is one alternatives though it is no easy task debating between two end of the right to die. In fact, only a handful of countries, including US, allow this practice.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, in the article, “Why Progressives Should Oppose the Legalization of Assisted Suicide” by Marylin Golden, she argues that “the cost of the lethal injection…is about $35 to $50… [which] [is] cheaper than the cost of treatment”(Golden 829). In other words, physicians have a tendency of favoring lower cost and reduction of man hours versus treating the patients the right way with an ethical mindset. In addition, in the article, “The Right to Pain Control”, by Doctor Eugene F. Diamond, who is a professor of pediatrics at Loyola University, argues that with the new Obamacare, “cures will no longer be attempted for certain vulnerable patients…” (Diamond 237). In other words, Diamond is trying to express on how physicians are denying the treatment for pain control in order to reduce costs and minimize physician-patient treatment…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays