Right To Bear Arms Research Papers

Improved Essays
Following recent trends, nearly fifty people fell victim to a mass shooting at an Orlando nightclub. Perpetrated by Omar Mateen, the event has culminated much debate over gun control legislation and the contentious Second Amendment. The Amendment, which allows legal residents to bear arms, doesn’t, however, prevent those on federal watch lists from purchasing guns. Even 225 years since its ratification, there is yet to be federal legislation that does so. The prospect of quite literally allowing potential terrorists to bear arms is inconceivable. The nation is leaving the door open for gunmen to manipulate the Amendment to purchase firearms to possibly carry out shootings - all without background checks. Although political figures throughout …show more content…
Time after time, the issue of crossing constitutional rights has prevented action. But it has also left the door open for more attacks. Without any federal regulations, attackers have been able to walk into a gun store and walk out with a firearm. The longstanding referendum of guarding one’s constitutional right to bear arms has put the country at risk of future shootings. Shooting after shooting, time has proved that the Second Amendment has clearly caused more harm to the nation and its people than it has benefited them. The law, enacted in 1791 during revolutionary times, is obsolete and holds no place in modern society. As the incidence of gun-related violence has infamously risen in recent years, the Amendment has stonewalled reform and will continue to unless action is taken. The question is, even as the Amendment is outdated and continues to paralyze the nation, how many more violent and a 100% preventable attacks on American soil will it take for Washington to finally comprehend the danger imposed by the Amendment to national security? It’s time for Washington to finally get it

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment gives the citizens of the United States the right to bear arm. Considering the enormity of this right, a heated debate has ensued on whether this right should be restricted. However, in the interest of public safety this right afforded by the bill of rights should be tightly regulated. This viewpoint has been developed through trial and error, after several mass shootings and high murder rates with a fire arms the United States is rendered no option but to restrict the Second Amendment to preserve the safety of the public.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Steve Nolan’s article “25 Reasons Why We Need To Preserve Our 2nd Amendment Right To Keep And Bear Arms,” he explains why we should bear arms, and why we should fight to keep our civil liberty to bear arms. This essay is intended to help the reader become more informed on the right to bear arms, how the media only covers gun related incidents, but not instances where guns have saved people, and how many politicians contort the 2nd amendment to aid them in elections. By uncovering some truths about gun owners, Nolan and many other pro-gun activist can shed some light on the truth behind the 2nd amendment. Nolan can affectively argue ones right to the 2nd amendment through studies, statistics, and personal experiences to produce evidence that supports the right to bear arms. The second amendement of the constitution expresses the right for American citizens to bear, or posess guns.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Times have changed in what is now called modern America, and the constitutional interpretation of the Second Amendment that was drafted in 1789, has always been a prickly subject, especially with the shockingly high incidents of gun-involved transgressions. Stricter gun control laws and licensing will not save lives; Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns (Barrett). The plea for tougher gun control laws continuously moves to the forefront when tragedy strikes, for example, Susan Milligan, a political and foreign affairs writer, reminds her readers of an instance when a twelve year old boy in New Mexico, took a shotgun to school in a musical instrument case and shot two of his classmates. He came from a family of hunters, not…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States constitution gives all citizens the unequivocal right to keep and bear arms, and as the constitution outlines this right shall not be infringed upon by any state actors. But, what happens when this unequivocal right leads to citizens obtaining firearms, when they have a mental health deficiency, or deemed criminally negligent, and these occurrences pose a threat to our national security, and safety as a nation of free citizens? Politicians and citizens believe they can answer this question based upon a statistical analysis of gun violence, and mass shootings that occur across the nation. However, the true answer lies within how to implement gun control measures, while still maintaining freedom for all…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People objecting respond with fear that the government is trying to take their guns. The argument comes to a complete stop after a few weeks. So even as America suffers gun violence attacks that are unequaled to rest of the industrialized world, nothing happens, no regulations are approved by Congress, nothing noteworthy is done to try to avoid the next gun attack. Americans who have the fear that their city or community could be the location where the next attack happens ponder what the next move is if any the United States has plan to decrease rates of gun violence. To reduce rates of gun violence, the federal government should implement a law that extends the waiting period on all firearm purchases to a month or more in which the individual goes through extreme background…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidential candidates have made the sales and ownership of guns a major discussion point in their political platforms. Earlier this year, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens called the Second Amendment “one of the six great flaws with the U.S. Constitution.” Justice Stevens, called for the constitution to be amended to say, “gun possession was only for state militias, not individuals.” School and church shootings, police being shot, movie watchers being gunned down as well as a limitless list of violent crimes are in the headlines daily. The pressure is on lawmakers to do something, yet most Americans agree it is not take away gun ownership.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this may be true, the Second Amendment has become the object of some study itself. Correlating with the predicament of whether it recognizes the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms. Opposing to, whether the right belongs solely to state governments and empowers each state to maintain a military force (Vandercoy, 2016). At the same time, it leaves the question unresolved of what the founders really had in mind when they conscripted this cutting edge declaration. With attention to that, the phenomenon has soared into heights beyond a meer debatable matter.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodger D. McGrath is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms. He wrote the article “A God-Given Natural Right.” McGrath’s article covers former disarmament, rise in crime, and history of the Second Amendment. His article has convincing reasoning for his intended audience. His targeted patrons are those who fiercely support the right to bear arms, proudly own multiple guns, believe gun restrictions mean complete disarmament, and those whom fear total government takeover.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With gun control debates emerging as a major topic in the past election and currently in our communities, it is imperative to distinguish the justification for the allowance of guns to remain apart of our society. Michael Huemer and Daniel Demetriou both suggest that individuals have a prima facie right to own a gun and that prohibition of such would violate the right to self defense. Both Huemer an Demetriou offer their own respective conclusions without citing the second amendment. Offering arguments without citing the second amendment is beneficial because typically those who oppose gun control commonly use the amendment as their sole source of justification. Huemer’s and Demetriou’s arguments both offer different and unique reasons in…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the things a lot of political figures can’t agree on is background checks. About 60% of all gun sales in America take place without any background check whatsoever (“Background Checks...”). On average, there is also 40% of gun sales occurring under private sales with “no questions asked.” Yet there is about 90% of Americans who agree there should be background checks done in order to keep it out of the hands of a misguided person (“Brady Campaign...”). The other side of this argument of not wanting to have background checks goes back to our 2nd Amendment which states that citizens have the right to “keep and bear arms.”…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays