Right To Bear Arms In America

Improved Essays
The Right To Bear Arms in America According to the second amendment in the U.S. Constitution, American citizens are allowed to own guns for purposes such as self-defense and recreation/hunting. Out of the many conflicts that are argued daily throughout America, the debate over whether the right to have ownership of a gun should or should not be taken away or restricted is one that has been discussed in Supreme Court cases such as in District of Columbia v. Heller, and researched by numerous professors and organizations (Greenhouse) . Many people decide who they are going to vote for in the presidential election based off their position regarding the second amendment. The right to have ownership of a gun should be restricted because taking …show more content…
According to Adam Winkler, professor at the UCLA School of Law, banning certain guns doesn’t work because manufacturers find a way to make the same guns by changing some elements of their design, and many gun control laws are seen as ineffective amongst experts on the matter of gun control. This means that the benefits of the policy still have not been completely shown where laws on restricting guns are being ineffective. However, this could also mean that there are actually more negative effects when gun control is actually implemented correctly, but as mentioned before, places like Missouri had an increase in violence once it reduced gun control (Tavernise) . This means that the gun control laws in the state were being implemented correctly as violence increased once the laws were regulated, and the policy of gun control had been leading to lower violence in Missouri. Overall, gun control laws could lead to less violence if they were fully effective, and in the places where regulations on guns are being implemented effectively, there is less violence, showing further why the right to have ownership of a gun should be …show more content…
The best solution for the problem of whether gun ownership should be restricted or not is that guns should be restricted, if not taken away completely, in every state in America. The solution would include restricting guns through gun control by passage through U.S. Congress and state governments by banning all heavy-weapons like assault rifles and snipers, by having complete background checks on anyone buying a gun, and banning anyone with a criminal record, any suspicions of being linked to terrorism, or mental disorders or anyone with a family member living in the house with the same conditions from obtaining a gun. These restrictions would prevent situations like in the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, where the gunman obtained his gun from his mother, as the ban on family members living with a mentally disordered person owning a gun wouldn’t of allowed this event to happen. As well, these restrictions would of prevented the 2016 Orlando club shooting where the killer had been suspected of being linked to terrorism in the past, as the restriction on owning a gun for those suspected of having terrorist ties would

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment stated in the Bill of Rights says that people have the right to bear arms. Whether if you are a U.S. citizen, militia, or a law enforcement officer, you can own a gun. Some people are confused about this amendment because it is not very specific. The whole amendment actually contains two different ideas in the same sentence, so thats why people are confused. So, was giving citizens the right to own a weapon the righteous thing to do?…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 2nd Amendment is the Right to Bear Arms. The 2nd Amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of the Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is a strong topic, because many people stand behind it and many people want it repealed. I located an article written by Bret Stephens of the New York Time’s Magazine on October 5, 2017 talking about repealing the 2nd Amendment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment for the US People. Do you think that we the people of America have the right to keep and bear arms? No other bill of right includes a civic purpose. Why people have the right to keep and bear arms in America. Because the people of America have the right to keep and bear arms.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The meaning of this is that all U.S citizens have the right to own a gun and use it in any situation needed, and when it says “Shall not be Infringed” it means to Actively break terms of a Law or Agreement. A gun's purpose in mostly to protect and defend people. I am for the second amendment that is my point of view.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Bear Arms Essay

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Right to Bear Arms, that was written as the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, gives every American the right to have and carry guns. With war and conflicts in other countries, and with all the violence, markings, break-ins, robberies, and assaults, people need to carry a gun to protect themselves. Every individual has the right to have arms to protect themselves from war or other nation. The Second…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Right to keep and bear arms: Americans are free to own firearms for their own defense. This bill of right was adopted but has been a topic of debate to several newspapers. Many believed that this right is the one that can be only exercised through militia organizations like National Guard (Nelson, n.d.). For instance, people were concerned about the issues that may arise due to the right for the citizens to own guns for their own protection. Nelson (n.d.) asserted that the federal government were given total legal authority over the army and militia.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial Amendments today is the ‘Right to Bear Arms.’ As I get older, I see life a lot more differently and how the Amendments can either be used in our favor as Americans or hurt us. To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791, the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Amendment 2, Right to Bear Arms - A Necessary Amendment? I. Background Information The Second Amendment of the Constitution is a hotly debated topic, but is not as recognizable as the First Amendment. It allows people to not only use firearms, but to provide them in defense and protection (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With gun control debates emerging as a major topic in the past election and currently in our communities, it is imperative to distinguish the justification for the allowance of guns to remain apart of our society. Michael Huemer and Daniel Demetriou both suggest that individuals have a prima facie right to own a gun and that prohibition of such would violate the right to self defense. Both Huemer an Demetriou offer their own respective conclusions without citing the second amendment. Offering arguments without citing the second amendment is beneficial because typically those who oppose gun control commonly use the amendment as their sole source of justification. Huemer’s and Demetriou’s arguments both offer different and unique reasons in…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have always been people who revered their country. It is our home, where freedom is of highest value. For 240 years the men of the United States of America have boasted their inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness. Hundreds of thousands of people dreamt of their new lives in America, and even died trying to achieve the ultimate state of freedom. However, no amount of religious freedom or freedom of speech, or peaceful protests will provide a tranquil mind.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays