Right To Bear Arms Essay

Democrats and Republicans both aim to keep the U.S. population as safe as possible. However, their methods in doing so are entirely different. All of this disagreement stems from how the reasoning behind the excessive amounts gun incidents remains unclear. Statistics are not able to predict these occurrences. Both parties are able to agree on crime and punishment, as statistics are able to show a clear correlation between time spent in prison and the results shown through past criminals. Democrats acknowledge that the individual right to bear arms is an integral part of the American tradition, and they believe in maintaining Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms, but they also believe that the right to own firearms should have reasonable guidelines.
Republicans defend the constitutional right to bear arms. They oppose federal licensing of law-abiding gun owners and national gun registration as a violation of the Second Amendment and an invasion of …show more content…
In the deal generated between some of the Senate’s most conservative and liberal members, judges would have the discretion to give sentences below the mandatory minimum for nonviolent drug offenders. Some current inmates could get their sentences reduced by as much as 25 percent by taking part in rehabilitation programs, if they are deemed a low risk to offend again. If this bill is passed, it will eliminate mandatory life sentences for three-time, nonviolent offenders. Violent offenders, sex offenders, inmates convicted of terrorism charges, and members of organized crime syndicates, and major fraud offenders would be excluded from this deal. The Senators’ goals include increasing fairness, decreasing recidivism, and controlling rising prison