Evidential Problem Of Evil In Richard Swinburne's 'Why God Allows Evil'

Superior Essays
Richard Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil” tackles the concept of the Evidential Problem of Evil, justifying the existence of evil within the world we live in. He has a plethora of reasons on why God allows evil to exist, and one, in which seems to be pausing for the audience at a glance, is that he believes that the extent of suffering humans are capable is within the limits of the right God has to cause humans to suffer (Swinburne 93-94). In other words, Swinburne states that the suffering in which humans are capable of enduring is, in the end, all for a greater or better purpose. What Richard Swinburne fails to address is that this is not something that is widely accepted by everyone. There are those who suffer for all their lives, those …show more content…
He mentions the relationship between a child and the parent as a metaphor between humans and God (Swinburne 94). A child cannot always get what he/she wants from the parent, and the parent will always do something that his/her child would want, yet it is for their own good. Pertaining to Swinburne’s claim, the answer is “yes” there are similarities in the metaphor, but there are also some problems. A good, ideal parent knows when to stop pushing his/her child, and regulate whatever the goal is. However, for God, when does he know when we or he has reached our limit? He may be omniscient, but does that mean when he pushes us past our limits, that he is doing this on purpose? Being not as wholly good as we thought he was? Richard Swinburne fails to address his claim’s supporting evidence in detail as he only addresses the topic with the use of confirmation bias. There is a lot that happens in a parent-child relationship, but Swinburne only addresses what benefits his claim and only explores the general portions of it. Everyone has their limits, and God knows well what our limits are because he created humans. The extent in which humans are capable of suffering may not be within the limits of the right of God. The benefits in the end may be questionable and the control in which God has over the suffering he has allowed may also

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    , pg. 102). If God were to be omniscient He should know when He creates a situation that it could lead to an unfortunate result. Because of this, Weirob believes that God is responsible for all actions. Weirob’s response to the argument about freedom includes a series of statements. First, God is omniscient.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibl 104 Research Paper

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this philosophical research paper is to attempt to develop an understanding on the concept of suffering while investigating the problem of evil from a theological perspective using scriptural references from the Holy Bible. Evil is the Absence of Good The Bible teaches that God is a powerful and almighty God. Many people wonder why there is so much pain, suffering, and corruption in the world if there is a presumably good God overseeing it. According to the Bible, God could not possibly cause evil since he is a righteous God.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Are people determined or do we have free will? While some stories and philosophers may believe that one’s destiny is something that is already decided and set out for them, I personally disagree. For me, when looking at history, sometimes it can seem like one’s fate is already set based on the actions in the past.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting with the second premise, he first lists conditions in which the 3-0 God could not have prevented an unnecessary suffering as following: 1) A greater Good occurs if and only if God does not prevent this unnecessary suffering. 2) A greater Good occurs if and only if God either permits unnecessary suffering or evil equal or worse. 3) Unnecessary suffering is preventable if and only if God allows some evil equal or worse.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his third premise, Mackie asserts that God failed to go with “the obviously better possibility of making beings who would act freely but always go right” (p. 124). Because God either was not able to or simply chose not to creates beings who always choose to do the good thing while they act freely, Mackie concludes that God cannot be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Mackie’s argument is logically valid, but since I believe there to be several discrepancies with his logic and reasoning, I do not believe his conclusion to be sound. For example, people have varying definitions of what constitutes “good” and “evil” and people might be acting in a situation with the intention of doing the good thing, only to have that action result in evil.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I say this because he kind of avoids the evils by coming up with excuses for as to why they occur still, rather than going against the occurrence. For example one thing he states is, since God is the father of us he has parental rights to allow us to suffer. This idea similarly follows the evidential problem of evil in the way that God has the right to have us suffer because in the end we gain greater good. He also states that suffering is a privilege even if that privilege seems to be forced upon you. However I feel like this is just a way of saying that evil happens no matter what.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction John Hick, the British Philosopher was born in 1922 in the United Kingdom. Hick is credited as a profound religious epistemologist, philosophical theologian, and religious pluralist (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). Hick contributed largely to the world of theology, writing one of his more famous works, Evil and the God of Love, where the chapter Soul-Making Theodicy is included (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). The attempt to explain the presence of evil, pain, and suffering has been asked and investigated throughout the centuries by philosophers, theologian, and layman alike.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout our lives, we all endure the trials and tribulations of suffering. One can define suffering as to be submitted to or to be forced to endure. We can also add to the definition by saying that suffering is inevitable or unavoidable. Those who read the Old Testament find that people are expected to endure the pains of suffering in their lives. Throughout the Bible, especially the old testament, God’s people endured suffering and the faith of God’s people was always being tested.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the history the answer for this question of human suffering remained a mystery. With Adam and Eve sin and suffering entered into the world, and this evil is experienced by all human being. But now by Jesus Christ, the Son of God, human suffering takes the new dimension of redemptive meaning. Pope John Paul says, “One can say that with the Passion of Christ all human suffering has found itself in a new situation.”…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This would seem to cohere to an idea that God is omniscient, in the sense he has vast knowledge, and can know any…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    (8.92-93) All sufferings are without an owner, because they are not different. They should be warded off simply because they are suffering. Why is any restriction made in this case? Why should suffering be prevented? Because everyone agrees.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays