Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

Improved Essays
The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems
In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all
…show more content…
Swinburne offers a free will theodicy. Before explaining his theodicy it is important to note the two types of evil. Natural evil, which is caused by disease, unforeseeable accidents, and natural disasters. Then there is moral evil, caused by humans intentionally doing actions they should not be, or evil caused out of negligence. God offers free will, humans have the power of make significant choices between good and evil. Free will needs to be there in order for deeper goods to come from it. There needs to be a choice of good and evil so evil is not necessary. As for natural evil possibilities, the evil would be consistent with God. The natural possibilities of evil are explained through three premises. If God is omnibenevolent, then He seeks to give us the deepest of goods, if God seeks to give us the deepest of goods, He will give us free and responsible choice, if God gives us that choice, then there exists the natural possibility of evil. This comes to the conclusion that if God is omnibenevolent then the natural possibility of evil …show more content…
It is our choice for there to be more good and evil in the world. Some just happen to make the wrong decisions, such as Hitler, and while these events are extremely horrid justice does prevail from them. The poor souls did not die for any ordinary reason, but rather wars and tragic events that are similar, happen in order for us to learn from our past mistakes. A less horrid example would be if a criminal is placed in jail for a crime they have committed, it is likely the criminal will learn their lesson and not commit that crime again. There is a reason why history is studied in schools across the world, it is to make sure that previous events are not repeated. There is a contradiction in my own statement however because we often see history repeating itself. Yet, from my own prior knowledge from my high school history teacher; history was not placed into the school curriculum until early- mid 1900’s. This would mean if one was not introduced to history prior to the era they were unaware of previous events that have happened throughout

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are two kinds of evil in this world according to Swinburne: moral and natural. Humans cause moral evil. Natural evil is due to natural causes. With moral evil, humans cause their own suffering due to the God-given gift of free will or “free and responsible choice.”…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie begins by addressing that every argument for the existence of God shown by philosophers has had its faults. The aim of Mackie’s argument is to prove that philosophy is not capable of criticizing arguments for the existence of God. Another aim is to prove that God does not exist, thus eliminating any positions made by theologians. Mackie calls his argument the ‘problem of evil’ since it demonstrates that the conception of both an omnipotent and wholly good God lacks rational support and is therefore irrational.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the theist was to truly believe that God was not wholly good, then he is opening doors to a sadistic God. Also, the theist could reject that God is not omnipotent. But the problem still remains of the theist not truly accepting that God is not all-powerful, and he cannot eliminate evil. The theist’s adequate solutions are not enough to get out of the problem of evil because he cannot fully accept the rejection of one proposition. Therefore, it is assumed that if the theist when discussing the problem of evil rejects the proposition, the proposition is then assumed elsewhere in the…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Leibniz Vs Mackie

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem of evil arises in both of the philosophical arguments by Gottfried Leibniz and J. L. Mackie, as they attempt to argue for and against the existence of God. The title of Leibniz’s book, Theodicy, translates into “the vindication of God’s power and goodness despite the existence of evil,” and so Leibniz attempts to solve the problem of evil through his work (Martin 313). Mackie’s work, Evil and Omnipotence, sets forth a strong thesis in his argument challenging religious belief in God. Despite the problem of evil in the world, it is still rational to believe in the existence of God.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discusses the Problem of Evil for theism, as well as defences theists have come up with against the problem. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: I shall argue that there is a possibility that God could have made different types of evils…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Evil In Evil and Omnipotence J.L Mackie argues that if there is a God who is all-powerful and all good than he would not have allowed there to be any evil in this world, or if there was any evil to begin with he would have eliminated it, but sense there is evil than God must not exist. If you think about how and what Mackie is arguing then it makes sense, that God must not exist if he would let us be tormented by evil on a daily biases, but this argument is only valid to the people who think God is both omnipotent and wholly good. Which few traditional Theist will say that God is not omnipotent or wholly good, but if you can than the problem of evil will not arise for you. Mackie also gives us a few fallacious solutions such as “Good cannot exist without evil” or “Evil is a necessary as a counterpart to good”.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Richard Swinburne’s “Why God Allows Evil” tackles the concept of the Evidential Problem of Evil, justifying the existence of evil within the world we live in. He has a plethora of reasons on why God allows evil to exist, and one, in which seems to be pausing for the audience at a glance, is that he believes that the extent of suffering humans are capable is within the limits of the right God has to cause humans to suffer (Swinburne 93-94). In other words, Swinburne states that the suffering in which humans are capable of enduring is, in the end, all for a greater or better purpose. What Richard Swinburne fails to address is that this is not something that is widely accepted by everyone. There are those who suffer for all their lives, those…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie Free Will

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Australian philosopher by the name of John Mackie realized a powerful inconsistency between the reality of an omnipotent (all mighty) being and the presence of free will in man, particularly those that carry out malicious acts. In his book Evil and Omnipotence (1955), Mackie disputes the existence of God based on the presence of evil within the world, stating that it is an “illogical contradiction” to believe both that an omnipotent God exists, and evil also exists in the world. Further, if it is true that God is the epitome of good and the creator of free-will, malevolent acts amongst mankind should be non-existent, or abolished entirely. This paper will strive to further Mackie’s argument, providing supporting evidence to the paradox and proof that evil existing in the presence of God defies the laws of…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first idea we face, is the logical problem of evil. What this questions is the possibility of there being an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omnipresent God and why evil still exists. One of the arguments made is, there is a God who is omnibenevolent and supposedly all good eliminates evil as far as it can, but we still have evil existing when there’s a God. By stating all of these, we have to give up one of the statements in order to make the argument true. The one fact that we can more than likely give up, is all good eliminates evil as far as it can.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper states one of many answers to the presence of evil and questioning God’s omnipotence presented by Mackie in his article “Evil and Omnipotence”. Mackie has his own “Inconsistent TRIAD” formula that states: 1. God is omnipotent 2. God is omnibenevolent 3. Evil exists.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Problem Of Evil Argument

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Problem with the Problem of Evil I am arguing that the Logical Problem of Evil (LPE) is not a successful argument to reject the existence of god. This is because the LPE has an inaccurate explanation for the definition of good. I will show that with the correct definition of “good,” an all good and all powerful god can logically exist simultaneously with evil. I will further show that, even if we accept this inaccurate definition of good, this argument will still not constitute the immediate rejection of the existence of god on the basis that god as an all good all knowing all powerful being has given humanity free will. A response to this objection is that humans are not free and are therefore not morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays