Language In Richard Joyce's 'Evolution Of Morality'

Decent Essays
PHIL401
November 2, 2017

Objection to Joyce
In Chapter 3 of The Evolution of Morality, Richard Joyce argues that “language is a prerequisite for having moral emotions” (Joyce, 76). According to Joyce, moral emotions are rich conceptually, and they have to involve moral concepts. He focuses on guilt, which is an emotion that is both related to moral sense and the language evolved traits. In this paper, I will argue that language is not a necessity for non-language users to have moral emotions since thoughts can come before language.
Joyce starts the chapter with the discussion of how non-language users cannot have moral thoughts. He uses the example of chimpanzees to argue that even if instrumentalism is a way to prove animals’ actions can
…show more content…
For example, when we are in an amusement park, does the sentence, “I feel happy,” exist in our mind? The happy inner feeling comes before you realize it. The same applies to guilt. Imagine that you break your mom’s favorite vase. The feeling of guilt comes at the second when you accidentally hit it and see the broken vase on the floor. “I feel sorry, and my mom will punish me for it.” Before you think of that sentence, your mind already gets the feeling. Therefore, I argue that moral emotions come before languages. Thought without language exists under circumstances that we have the self-awareness of the world. We are aware of our actions and the consequences, while under many conditions, language is not a necessity for explaining the …show more content…
In her book, The Story of My Life, she writes about her childhood. Before Keller met her teacher, Anne Sullivan, she does not have any ability of language. During that period, Keller has the sense of moral emotions. Keller stood between two persons who talk to each other. She tried to imitate them, but she could not make a sound (Part I, Chapter II). This provoked her because Keller believes it is unfair that other people can use their mouth to speak, but she could not. This example proves that she had this sense of moral emotion of unfairness at the age of five when she is still incapable of using any language in any form. Keller also says that she knew she is different from others, even though she cannot tell what it is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to our emotions, how strong is a feeling of disgust? Is it strong enough to influence our considered moral judgments or is it just an untrustworthy emotion? In Chapter 5 of the book, Yuck!, the author, Daniel Kelly, addresses this question and defends the skeptical view of moral disgust against a moral disgust advocate’s view. Moral disgust advocates believe that disgust should influence our considered moral judgments, but moral disgust skeptics say it should not. By discussing the standard dispute between advocates and skeptics, I will explain Kelly’s account on the nature of disgust, and how he uses the Entanglement and Co-opt thesis to debunk the views held by disgust advocates.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One particular debate that has bedeviled humanity since its inception is the question of the nature of human morality. We as humans argue about the source of morality: most religious fundamentalists argue that morality comes from a deity, whereas secularists tend to argue that morality comes from within and is subjective. We also argue about its objectivity, and many will attest that their moral code is a paragon above all others. Morality is a code by which most sane humans live their lives; it would seem logical that such a dominant force in human interaction would foster such discourse. Amongst all the uncertainty in the nature of morality, however, there is but one certainty: morality is based entirely on perspective.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C. S. Lewis, in his classic work “Mere Christianity,” describes a basic Christian worldview. A significant theme of the book is on what the issues of morality means for the human race, as well as what morality means in relation to God and to one another. Where does morality come from and how does one become moral? Morality originates with God, Lewis argues, nor can man be truly moral apart from the transforming work of Jesus Christ.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    II. Kennett, “Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency” Kennett claims that psychopaths are amoral most likely due to their lack of empathy which is also an impairment in individuals with autism. However, it does not seem to be the case that autistic individuals are also amoral. Kennett claims that “an examination of moral thinking in high-functioning autistic people supports a Kantian rather than Humean account of moral agency.”…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kids and adults today don’t care as much for an education like Keller and Douglass did in these stories. Keller and Douglass wanted to learn so badly that they went through the struggles that they had to. Hellen Keller was a blind and deaf woman and Fredrick Douglass was an African American slave that was not allowed to learn. Both "The Story of My Life" and "Narrative or the Life of Fredrick Douglas, an American Slave" share the central idea that education is worth the struggle they had to go through, but they do so in different ways To begin with, Keller’s struggle with education was different from Douglass’s because she was blind.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one of her earliest memories, she recalls learning the word water and not understanding that it was not the same as mug. It would not be until she felt water and could associate the description to the word that she would be able to distinguish the difference between the two (Keller 146). People who are born with the ability to hear and see would easily understand why a mug is called a mug and the obvious difference between a mug and water. For Keller, it was a matter of hands on experience and her repeated questioning that helped create an additional path for her to learn and understand the meaning behind…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions on Three Narratives 1. What is the difference between naysaying ethics and yeasaying ethics? Explain. What does this have to do with the story of the people of LeChambon? Naysaying ethics “forbids our doing certain harmful things”, even if that means to close the eyes to the reality and don’t do what people know it’s a right decision.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Helen Keller was born normal, but fell ill when she was nineteen months old which took away her hearing and sight. She was diagnosed with scarlet fever or meningitis, a bacterial infection caused by group A Streptococcus. The illness caused her throat and ear to go mute and deaf. She learned how to read and write through her hand, fingers and touch. Even with her disability, she became an activist for people with disabilities, lecturer, and an author.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but she overcame that disability and created a meaningful life for herself through language. Helen first learned what language was from her teacher Anne Sullivan, as she said, “Suddenly I felt a misty consciousness of something forgotten – a thrill of returning thought; and somehow the mystery of language was revealed to me. I knew then that “w-a-t-e-r” meant the wonderful and cool something that was flowing over my hand” (74). Language gave her the framework to express herself. Helen Keller did not just empower herself, she now inspires us to do the exact same.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harman's Argument Analysis

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Harman presents the argument that we never have any evidence for or against any moral claim and that moral “facts” serve no purpose regarding the explanation of making observations unlike scientific facts do. In this essay, I will argue why I believe that Harman’s argument is ultimately successful, successful being that it is convincing of its conclusion. I will accomplish this by first paraphrasing Harman’s premises in an understandable manner. Next, I intend to provide a possible attack that could be used to show how Harman’s argument fails and alter my focus on to why that attack should not succeed as well as delivering a counter-argument to ensure my argument is not one-sided. Finally, I will provide a proper conclusion that summarizes…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, just as all moral intuitions must require emotions, all emotions must require an evolutionary past. Consider again the proposition that the death of a person is a bad thing. I have already shown that this elicits an intuition that is necessarily–at least to some degree–emotional. But where does that emotion come from? While it is much easier to trace the evolutionary history of stronger emotions such as fear and disgust, even weaker emotions like compassion have their primeval origins.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays