Richard III Essay On Guile

Improved Essays
The word guile is used twice in Richard III, both times as a describing term for an actions or our protagonist Richard of Gloucester. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word has evolved in its spelling but gained its modern spelling and interpretation in 1671, “Insidious cunning, deceit, treachery”. This seems to be a fitting word to describe the character of Richard who serves as our main character, though he is also the villain of the play. He backstabs people who are friends and family, and has little regard for others lives when it contradicts his own will. His plans are subtle and sly, enough to give him power over others, which helped keep other from confronting him for so long. The most interesting use of the word is in act two scene one when Buckingham speaks of himself, as deserving of a friend who is, “Deep, hollow, treacherous, and full of guile …show more content…
Shakespeare). His friend he gains, Richard, is the leader to Buckingham whom he devotedly serves in his journey to power. Later in the play, Buckingham loses his faithful dedication to Richard and his demands which leads to his demise. Despite Buckinghams loyal following throughout most of the play he ends up being a casualty in Richard’s process to gain power. His earlier declaration comes true when he is left with Richard as an acquaintance, who does not care about the well being of Buckingham. Guile is an encompassing word that can sum up the actions of Richard towards Buckingham; he took advantage of his loyalty and encouraged cunning activities so that both may gain power. Richard however, has little intention of sharing his power with Buckingham and repaying him for his help, which does well in exemplifying the definition of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For instance, during his portrayal of the King, he says: Why dost thou converse with that trunk of humors, that bolting-hutch of beastliness, that swollen parcel of dropsies, that huge bombard of sack, that stuffed cloakbag of guts, that roasted Manningtree ox with the pudding in his belly, that reverend Vice, that gray iniquity, that father ruffian, that vanity in years? (2.4.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Geoffrey Chaucer and Marie de France have strikingly similar themes within the Breton Lai’s they have produced within their works. A Breton Lai is a narrative form of English and French Medieval literature that usually consist of tales of Courtly love, Chivalry, and often using supernatural elements within the story as well. Both Chaucer’s work of The Wife of Bath’s tale and Breton Lais produced by Marie de France such as Bisclavret and Lanval incorporate all of these elements and they will be examined and compared in this response. The Earliest Breton Lai’s were written by Marie de France and although we have no way of knowing whether or not Chaucer read Marie de France’s works, we can clearly see a connection between the two authors as shown in The Wife Of Bath’s Tale.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How does Shakespeare use symmetry, in which scenes or even people seem to be slightly altered reflecting the other scenes or people in order to make his point? In addition to the political quarrels, William Shakespeare has depicted several comparisons between characters and settings to mirror situations in Henry IV. King Henry has juxtaposed Hal and Hotspur, Hal enjoys diversions and humour whereas Hotspur is exhibited in a serious manner. Contrasted again, Hotspur is the epitome of honour contracting to Falstaff who believes honour is nothing.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But rather he is challenging the British literary world, and their belief that they hold all the knowledge to Shakespeare’s plays. He does this constantly throughout the entire film, showing scenes of British scholars where he has put them on the spot making them seem as if they don’t know anything. A great example of this is when he is interviewing Emrys Jones, a well-known Shakespeare academic and he is asked a question to which he responds, “I don’t really know the answer.” Straight away the scene is cut and immediately followed by a different scene of Pacino explaining exactly what the British scholar couldn’t.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard III Hero's Journey

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Surrounding himself with flatterers, Richard lets them fill his head with words of perfection as if he is doing nothing wrong, all while he is losing popular support: “A thousand flatterers sit within thy crown, / Whose compass is no bigger than thy head.” (2.1.100-101). Richard allows these aforementioned flatterers to have influence over his rule and he appoints his favorites into positions of power. He thinks his rule is supreme and secure, when in reality his supreme authority is all in his head as he is ignorant of the populous turning against him. His most recent land seizing exploit is the last straw, angering the nobles and prompting Gaunt to brand him “Landlord of England are thou now, not king.”…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry VII Failures

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the beginning the gentry heavily favoured by Richard posed a serious threat of rebellion, many of which were either Yorkists or supporters, and though his marriage to Elizabeth did stem some of the hostility the north still heaved with overly powerful lords loyal to Richard. A visit was arranged to display Henry’s power and standing, and despite being attacked he succeeded in this assertion. Closer to home Henry faced a number of Richard’s supporters on the council. He made the decision to remove those closes to Richard while keeping enough of the original council to retain a stable and balanced government. These moves both assured his station as a king that wasn’t afraid to act against opposition, both physically and politically, and was unafraid to make changes to assure things worked smoothly for him.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard I Failure

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though Richard I was very much a warrior king who personally led expeditions, had a mind for logistics, and achieved military successes in Europe and the Middle East, he neglected the domestic affairs of his own kingdom in the pursuit of glory in the Holy Land, leaving England at a time when civil unrest, massacres, and anti-Jewish riots plagued multiple English towns. Additionally, Richard I bears partial responsibility for the anti-Jewish violence of the time, as in 1189, his court brutally rebuffed a Jewish delegation to Richard I’s coronation and set off anti-Jewish rioting in London which would spread to other towns. Richard I was reportedly favorable to these developments, and as stated earlier, neglected his nation’s domestic affairs to pursue the Third…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The corruption of power prevails across time periods, as initiated by Shakespeare and confirmed by Pacino in Looking for Richard. Undoubtedly, the battle for authority overrules the natural order of a human being, hence the consequent result of destruction and loss. In Richard III, Shakespeare thoroughly examines the nature of power and authority, utilising Richard’s brutal actions to demonstrate that the ends do not justify the means. In the Elizabethan theocracy, power was conferred through hereditary, not merit, hence Richard as a clearly unworthy and unwanted heir to the throne. In granting Richard the opportunity to cement his ‘power’, Shakespeare depicts the protagonist exerting the Machiavellian influence, as seen seducing the young Princes in Act 3, Scene 3, “God keep you from such false friends”, and “Your grace attended to thy sugared words.”…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare utilizes foil characters to illuminate Hamlet’s positive and negative attributes and thus portray him as a dynamic character. Shakespeare illustrates the commonality between Hamlet and the foil characters, Ophelia, Laertes, and Fortinbras, through the tragic events that consume their lives and their emotional responses. Furthermore, Shakespeare emphasizes the foil characters’ respective contrasts from Hamlet to expose his resilience, fairness, and procrastination. Ultimately, Shakespeare uses the foils to depict Hamlet’s both honorable and dishonorable feature to, in turn, convey his complex nature.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Shakespeare personifies King Henry’s need to maintain control of the situation through rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?/ Shall we by treason an indent with fears/” This reveals to the audience that because of King Henry 's paranoia he needs to ask constant questions to assure himself that his followers are still loyal to him furthermore the rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?” serves the purpose of manipulating blunt into thinking that Mortimer is a traitorous coward. Shakespeare 's use of intimidating tone, religious allusion and rhetorical questions shows how paranoia leads individuals to manipulate politician situations in order to maintain control over power and leadership…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes the clearest method of defining what something should be is by juxtaposing it with something that is the opposite. In literature, authors often use the literary device of a foil to convey the central theme of the story. The foil is effective because it shows both the good and the bad versions of people that share the same status or position in life, yet they develop differently. Shakespeare uses foils in many of his plays to depict the theme, however, Henry V is one of the obvious plays that this is true of. Shakespeare communicates that humility is integral to a righteous leader through the use of the Dauphin as a foil to Henry in Henry V. The way that Henry and the prince of France interact with the men beneath them shows the quality of their leadership skills.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Character Foils In Hamlet

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Character foils are individuals who parallel each other, but have some dissimilar traits. As these individuals are comparable, their differing characteristics have heightened contrast, allowing for certain qualities to manifest themselves more fully. Within Hamet by William Shakespeare, foil characters serve the purpose of characterizing the protagonist. This characterization is witnessed three times when foils are employed to highlight Hamlets’ indecisiveness, sanity and remorsefulness. While many aspects of Hamlet’s character develop through foils, one feature that is revealed most prominently through foils is Hamlet’s indecisiveness.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Betrayal has been a tool used to gain power throughout history. It has been used to climb the corporate ladder, gain political power and even win wars. At any point in history someone has been stabbed in the back for someone else’s personal gain and Shakespeare’s time was no exception. In many plays by Shakespeare, the characters are involved in physical battles in order to gain power, however; in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the battles for power are fought through spying, lies and backstabbing. In Hamlet, Shakespeare demonstrates that betrayal leads to a radical development of Hamlet’s personality.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Richard II’s Underserved Loyalty by the Commoners Wat Tyler’s Rebellion was written after 1381 by an anonymous author to persuade the readers that King Richard II did not deserve the loyalty and devotion put forth by the commons. The author provides the reader with a chronicle of the peasant’s revolt in which he presents the commons’ reasons for revolting and how the King reacts to each interaction with the commons. The peasants are portrayed as justified in their actions, while the King is portrayed as a leader with no preference towards helping the peasants.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew men are portrayed as powerful but in an ironic actuality they are controlled by their emotions and the situations they are put in. The characters Christopher Sly and Baptista verify this with their lack of jurisdiction and feelings. Christopher Sly exposes how men are at a loss of power when they cannot control themselves or when their passion overwhelms their sense of thought. Shakespeare demonstrates irony when he writes “‘Am I a lord, and have I such a lady?...…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays