slave trade during the mid-nineteenth century. His contention that the majority of Mount Airy’s slaves, which the Tayloes sent to Alabama, were kept together on the family’s southern plantations, contradicting the slave accounts in Edward E. Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told (58, 183, 273-274). This exemplifies the dangers of using one plantation as the representative for an entire system, especially one that seems to be the exception rather than the rule in several ways. It is interesting that Dunn criticizes the traditional slavery historiography, claiming historians usually focus “on the most visible people; e.g., those who run away, wrote about themselves, or were in other ways remarkable” (2). Yet Dunn does just that by focusing on the Mount Airy plantation. The Tayloe family was unusual. They were remarkable for their time. The fact that they inquired so deeply into the lives of their slaves and kept such detailed records is the reason they can be studied so thoroughly
slave trade during the mid-nineteenth century. His contention that the majority of Mount Airy’s slaves, which the Tayloes sent to Alabama, were kept together on the family’s southern plantations, contradicting the slave accounts in Edward E. Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told (58, 183, 273-274). This exemplifies the dangers of using one plantation as the representative for an entire system, especially one that seems to be the exception rather than the rule in several ways. It is interesting that Dunn criticizes the traditional slavery historiography, claiming historians usually focus “on the most visible people; e.g., those who run away, wrote about themselves, or were in other ways remarkable” (2). Yet Dunn does just that by focusing on the Mount Airy plantation. The Tayloe family was unusual. They were remarkable for their time. The fact that they inquired so deeply into the lives of their slaves and kept such detailed records is the reason they can be studied so thoroughly