Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
“Tabula Rasa” is part of John Locke’s philosophy and is a Latin principle of understanding that the nature of humans is a blank slate. John Locke is “one of the most important political theorist of the enlightenment, [and] a founding figure of the school of philosophy known as empiricism” (Locke 125). As an Empiricist he holds that “knowledge derives from experience rather than from pure reason” (Short). “John Locke viewed human nature as not inherently self-interested or aggressive” (Locke 125). Mencius and Hsun Tzu are two philosophers of the warring states period of China. Mencius says that human nature is good, and Hsun Tzu believes that it is evil. The Philosophy of both confucians’ on the subject of human nature directly counters both …show more content…
His philosophy of human nature is the people are inherently good. An evil wicked human being such as Hitler still had the capacity of doing well. That is his perception of what a righteous nature means; “people are born capable of being good” (Mencius 96). Kao Tzu’s outlook on human nature is independent of Meniscus. He believed, “humans are neither … good nor ... evil, [as he states], The nature of things is like swirling water” (Mencius 94-95). Kao Tzu uses water because it can be easily manipulated through external forces. Kao Tzu believes that you start out with a “blank slate”, and depending on your environment, and circumstances you may encounter throughout your life, you will be molded by, or take the shape of your experiences. Whether you end up better or worse, the message he is conveying, is that by birth, no matter one's misfortune, we have the characteristic of being good. Kao Tzu’s philosophy correlates exactly with John Locke's. Experiences are the determining factor to one’s own …show more content…
“Empiricists hold that knowledge derives from experience rather than from pure reason. This implies a distinction between experience and reason. Reasoning is something we do. Experience is something we su­ffer” (Short). As stated before, your environment and circumstances you may encounter throughout your life, will mold and shape who you are. A new born baby has no sense or definition of what good and evil are. Also a baby grows up in poverty will be more likely influenced to a life of crime to support his/her family. In contrast to a person who grows up in a better environment? Their circumstances will"[The] source of ideas every man has wholly in himself … [comes from]... sensation …, and reflection” (Locke 127). “The correlation between poverty and crime is something that appears to be obvious" (Petrovec). “No abundant or profound studies appear to explain how to avoid measures that seem to contribute to the well-being of citizens but actually increase the gap between the rich and poor part of the population” (Petrovec). Human Nature is “the fundamental dispositions and traits of humans”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Humanities 1020 Study Guide Chapter 15-17. Identify each in complete sentences: 1. Council of Trent The main principal of the counter reformation, the Council of Trent was one of the Roman Catholic Church’s most regal councils 2.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olivia Vogel Introduction to philosophy Jones Defining the Self Can you really interpret oneself? If so, how can one person be continuously developing and be defined for that precise amount of time? Every day you are constantly changing, some people with dispute at the fact that they never really change, that they have always been the same. To me, I believe that it is fallacious, we humans evolve over time and we learn through experiences that come our way.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau and Locke have similar views on the idea that humans are born good. Locke supports Aristotle’s theory of tabula rasa, meaning blank slate. He believes that children are born with a clean slate without sin and innate ideas. A child is born with specific capabilities that are genetically linked to how they are able to develop later in life. With the help of education a child has the potential for growth.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke argues that it is acceptable to punish people for crimes they do while they are drunk, asleep, not in their right mind. He accepts that one might not be acting as the person they identify with, but nonetheless, it is justifiable to still punish you. In this paper, I will explain why Locke is correct for believing that people should be responsible for their actions even if they are unconscious of these actions. Locke is correct because human law cannot distinguish certainly what is real. In addition, there is only one man, he is the same person in both conscious and unconscious.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chinese Parenting Styles

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The preconceived notion we have regarding both the Chinese and British parenting styles are that they are both much stricter than how we parent as an American culture. They both are so far removed from our western way of life. It is a common notion that Chinese children excel in subjects like math and science, also that British children have far superior manners. “Chinese children really shine in their academic performance, particularly in mat and science” (p. 173 Heine, 2008) Each style has its firm stance in why they are correct in their style of parenting.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Are Humans Born Morally Bad, Amoral, or Morally Good? Introduction The argument about whether humans are born morally bad, morally neutral, or morally good has been controversial for many years, with different philosophers proposing dissimilar perspectives. Plato believes that humans are born morally good.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Locke's view on people and their good will is similar to my viewpoint of people being naturally good. The ideas of humans being reasonable beings, born free and equal and having the natural rights of life, liberty, and property, and the Tabula Rasa are reasonable and agreeable that Locke believed in. However, Thomas Hobbes idea of all humans are naturally wicked and selfish shouldn't be fully discriminated and ignored. I believe that all humans are naturally good because of personal experiences of seeing people helping others out of their own will, reporting and sharing news and important information, and putting things into action that will overall have a good impact on anybody. Everywhere around the world, there are people who volunteeringely…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke is a modern philosopher whose theory is that your experiences you have make you the individual you are today. People who have positive experiences in their life become better people. As we create memories in our life it helps shape who we are today. Locke’s philosophy is correct because people who have positive memories tend to be more happy while people who have negative memories tend to be less happier. People who create negative memories will end up being a troublemaker while people who create positive memories will end up being a peacemaker.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are people born evil or is our environment that shapes how we act? This question is one that is hard to answer. However, I do believe that it is our environment around us that shapes how we behave. As humans, we are born pure into the world and the people around us, as well as the how we are raised, helps mold us into who we are and how we act. Adam was created a perfect man… and govern his actions according to the dictates of the law of reason God had implanted in him (Locke, The Second Treaty of Civil Government).…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One can argue that man’s human nature is both inherently good and evil, but it is through the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden that each generation born after them was no longer born without shame, which Hsun Tzu does a great job of showing how man’s nature is inherently evil. Hsun Tzu was a Chinese scholar who followed the Confucian belief who lived from 300-230 BCE. He wrote this piece of literature explaining how man is not born with an innocent or pure nature, meaning that in the eyes of God when we are born we are born sinful. If this was not the case, and Mencius was correct about humans being pure in nature then no one would have the urge to murder, steal or anything that we consider to be sinful today. However, this is not…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good or Evil I believe humans in nature were born being good and doing good with other people. No one is born having a mindset of doing evil. The Human Nature that Locke states is “Man is by nature a social animal”. This is a great example of what I believe since humans do many great things together for the greater good and do good on their own for the benefit of themselves and others.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without taking into account genetic disposition, a child is born as a “clean slate” and the way they experience society and life skills determines how they will turn out. John Locke, a classical philosopher born in 1632 (Biography), takes on the argument that a person is born as a clean slate and that the people and events that they encounter are what that shape their ideals and their character. The social and societal impacts left on an infant or child can shape their personality as well as their character, beliefs, and potential actions. The nature vs nurture argument is more valid when it comes to the nurture aspect of the argument. Similar to how the monster in Mary Shelley’s…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moment a child takes their first breathe, they are a blank slate ready to molded by the surroundings of the world they have just entered. They have no concept of what is right and wrong or how they are supposed to act in public. Children are like a blank canvas meaning that when they are born they have no sins, no conception of life, they do not know how to handle life until they experience it for themselves. The way experiences affect children can change the way a child turns out for better or for worse (Chugani). John Locke’s philosophy of a child being a blank state that is formed throughout experience has shaped the way our society teaches children.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays