The author presents his claim that the idea of agriculture was detrimental to our lives as human beings, and he goes on in the rest of the article to support this argument with scientific evidence provided by various paleopatholigists and his own personal experiences.
Though the article is classified as an editorial, the author visits New Guinea and uses his experiences there to further his claim.
This conflict is present throughout the text, for the author portrays his view of the effect of agriculture on the primitive and modern lives of human beings. He believes that agriculture posed as a threat to our advancement as human beings and opposes the idea altogether.
The speaker denounces the opposing side, stating that archaeologists have
Though the article is classified as an editorial, the author visits New Guinea and uses his experiences there to further his claim.
This conflict is present throughout the text, for the author portrays his view of the effect of agriculture on the primitive and modern lives of human beings. He believes that agriculture posed as a threat to our advancement as human beings and opposes the idea altogether.
The speaker denounces the opposing side, stating that archaeologists have