Rhetorical Analysis : Why Helmets Don 't Prevent Concussions Essay

1176 Words Sep 27th, 2016 5 Pages
Rhetorical Analysis on “Why Helmets Don’t Prevent Concussions and What Might
What if I told you the equipment we use as protection from injury, when playing sports, is causing us more harm than help? A new study found that when playing sports, helmets only provide minimum protection against head injuries. In his presentation “Why Helmets Don’t Prevent Concussions and What Might”, bioengineer and former football player David Camarillo talks about what is happening to the brain when a concussion occurs and different strategies that can be used to better modify the standard helmet so that it provides better protection against head injuries sustained when playing sports such as football and bicycling. Camarillo did a good job appealing to the audience using logos by providing videos and personal information, he shared his own personal experience with concussions to appeal to the audience using pathos, and the fact that he is a bioengineer, former football player, and featured on Ted talks adds to his ethos appeal.
In his presentation, Camarillo begins his discussion by relating to the audience fear about the word concussion. Camarillo goes on to discussing sports played, where a person could possibly be at risk of a concussion, and then he highlights different issues about the standard helmet most sports players use and how and why they do not provide the best protection against a concussion. He also talks about different diseases and complications a person could face after…

Related Documents