How Does Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech

Improved Essays
In act three, scene two of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Mark Antony addresses the plebeians and they want to know why Caesar is killed. Antony 's response to Caesar’s death is critical and he grieves over his death. He could not believe that his own friends had killed Caesar. After finding out about his death, Antony gives a speech the funeral. Antony goes along with the conspiracy so that he would not be killed as Caesar was. Brutus gives a speech to the people to explain his excuse for murdering Caesar. He uses logic to convince them it was the right action to take. People use their minds to think things over and make decisions, but sometimes emotions get the best of a person. In the opening section of Antony’s speech he gets the …show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical devices and conveys to the plebeian’s emotions to get them thinking and on his side. Antony changes the people of Rome view of Caesar being a tyrant to a hero and big-hearted ruler, who was accused of wrongdoing. Through the use of repetition of key words in contexts that reverse their meaning, through phrasing that suggests that Brutus is wrong and through theatrical gestures, Mark Antony sways the crowd to his position.
Antony cleverly repeats key words, using them to suggest the opposite of their actual meanings. The words “honorable” and “noble” initially show approval of Brutus, but result in his condemnation. Antony mentions the will and says he has said too much and he “I fear I wrong the honorable men, Whose daggers have stabbed Caesar. I do fear it.” If Brutus is honorable than why is Antony afraid. He repeats “honorable” to accentuate Brutus’s honorability and make the people of Rome question it. He points out Brutus kills Caesar. He gets Brutus’s permission to speak at the funeral, “For Brutus is an honorable man; So are they all, all honorable men”. Every time he uses “honorable”, he describes an honorable trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus accusation. Also if he
…show more content…
Antony uses rhetorical questions that imply a negative answer. Antony lists Caesars’s virtues, then says "Did this in Caesar seems ambitious?". He questions them to lead the people of Rome to believe not it. By listing all the righteous deeds Caesar does, he builds credibility for Caesar. That credibility disproves Brutus’s statements about Caesar. Caesar was offered the crown 3 times, “Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”. Caesar rejects the power that comes with the crown, so there is no way he was or wanted to be a tyrant. Everyone loved Caesar before, “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?”. No one has reasons to not feel bad for him. He has helped the poor and did not want the power, which was given to him. He has not done harm to anyone, this invalidates claims made about Caesar. He uses conjunctions that signal the opposite meaning. He says he is not here to disprove Brutus “But here I am to speak what I do know.” All the people only know what Brutus told them, but Antony knows the whole truth. Therefore, Brutus is lying or hiding a truth. He is not an eloquent public speaker “But, as you know me all, a plain blunt man”. He is not here to persuade the people against Brutus and he is a normal person just like the rest of them, but in reality, he is better than him and trying to get the people against Brutus. He does not want to be the cause of mutiny, “But here’s a parchment with the seal of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All three of these speeches provide exceptional examples of rhetorical devices that are influential in literature. Throughout the duration of Antony’s speech, repetition is used to stress the significance of certain phrases. When referring to Brutus, Antony repeats the phrase, “honorable man” four separate times. This indirectly implies that in Antony’s eyes, Brutus is a sinner, and therefore, he is not honorable.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome. Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony knows that because of his use of emotion he will be able to manipulate the crowd to go against Brutus and the…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As long as he followed the rules he could say whatever he wanted. To start off his speech Antony tells the citizens “I come to bury Caesar, not praise him.’’ (Antony 49). Little did the citizens know he would do the complete opposite. All Antony does in his speech is praise Caesar and everything that he has done.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word honorable is repeated all throughout Antony’s speech which, eventually, changes the thoughts of the crowd. In this case, Pathos is shown because Antony put in the minds of the crowd that Brutus is not one to trust and not honorable, making the fickle crowd angry at Brutus for his actions. In addition, Antony also repeated the word ambitious, in order to defend Caesar. As a matter of fact, Antony states “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony manipulates the audience by using this deductive reasoning to prove that it is unjust to murder someone who cares so much about them. Antony starts with a universal truth and backs it up with evidence. He is giving the citizens of Rome further knowledge, so they can make their own decision. From this truth, Antony was able to reach the conclusion that Brutus cannot be labeled as a honest man when he said that Caesar was ambitious and Antony had just proved his point wrong. The audience comes to a realization that they cannot trust Brutus.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony: A True Hero

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Notwithstanding the greatness of his loyalty, Mark Antony displays many other indications of being a hero, an example of such being his favor in the eyes of the Roman people. The people of Rome chose to side with Antony over Brutus, when each character gave their funeral speeches after the death of Caesar. Brutus gave to the people his reasoning for killing Caesar, yet Antony only praised his deceased friend and never once tried to directly disprove the conspirator’s word. As Antony’s speech goes on his listeners fondness for him noticeably grows, the plebeians words show this well. The character of Third Plebeian says, even before the speech comes to an end, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony.”…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays