Rhetorical Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

Improved Essays
In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer informs his readers about the defects in society's attempt toward world poverty and the issues related with it through illustrations utilizing a philosophical contention to state that individuals ought to give 100% of their unnecessary salary to abroad guide associations. Singer uses hypothetical methods to achieve his objective of getting perusers to really trust his thoughts and change their qualities and customs. He uses a frustrated but yet straightforward tone in this article and shows his perspective in an enthusiastic way by giving various hypothetical illustrations. Singers point of the story is that it is wrong for people to spend their money on non-essential things such as vacations and eating out when there are kids …show more content…
He may have persuaded many individuals to give a specific measure of cash to organizations for poor nations, yet his article isn't sufficiently powerful to persuade me. Everyone should be entitled to have the luxury to spend it on what their hearts desire, despite the fact that many would contend that they are doing as such to the cost of their ethical quality. Singer uses a hypothetical situation where he describes a guy named Bob and his fondness for his Bugatti. Bob invested in the car because further down the line he will be able to sell it and he will be financially stable due to it being a very valuable and classic collective. One day Bob decided to hike for a bit so he parked his car near a railroad track only to get to the top and see a train from far away speeding really fast towards a child on the track. Bob has a chance to save the child's life by making a serious decision. He can flip the switch so it takes another direction, however by doing that his Bugatti will be demolished in the procedure. Bob chooses not to do such thing as to ruin his life saving and collective Bugatti. As a result of his decision, the kid dies on the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The moral dilemma shown here, is the same one that Singer believes occurs every time an American who already owns a TV chooses to go out and buy a new one. Instead of using this excess money to upgrade their television, they should be donating it to prevent the deaths of kids in need. Even though these two decision both have different factors to them, they both could lead to the same result. Except, in one scenario a kid dies by being sold to an organ peddler, and in the other a child dies of hunger on the street.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trump has issued new executive orders that have shocked not only Americans, but also people from all over the world. Basically what these orders are to do is that they are intended to ban Muslims from seven countries from entering the United States. Even those who have been living in America for quite a while are to be deported to their countries. What is more devastating is that students who had their student visas from their home countries to come study in the USA are no more welcomed here and have to face these new abnormal orders. I think the new executive order is definitely intended to discriminate against Muslims because there were no terrorist attacks performed from people who are from these 7 countries in the U.S.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Singer’s view as well as many others, Bob was wrong in allowing the child to die when he had an opportunity to save that child. Singer goes on to say, that similar to Bob we have an opportunity to save children everyday by donating to charities like UNICEF that assist children in poverty stricken countries. However, like Bob many of us choose to not give up our luxuries to save children’s lives, therefore like Bob we are not living up to our moral responsibilities (MacKinnon & Fiala,…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer failed to consider why people work so hard. While it is in good spirit to give to the needy and homeless, it is also in good spirit to enjoy the fruit of one’s labor. And if the needy and homeless people, who are capable of getting a job and improving their condition, would try better and do what they need to do, then the number of people on the street will reduce…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Singer does not provide criteria to decide on what is morally comparable. Also, I will deny Singer’s conclusion that we are obligated to donate as much as we can to help end poverty. I will argue that donating to charity is supererogatory, which means that donating to charity is not obligated, but instead a positive thing to do. I will also deny his second premise which states that it is our moral responsibility to prevent bad things from happening to other people.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Life You Can Save,” Singer displays how many Americans have the means to send money to help those suffering from poverty and terrible living conditions, concluding that if a person does not donate thousands of dollars to aid agencies, they are doing something morally wrong. However, in objection to Singer’s arguments, John Arthur points out that if a person must do what creates the most good, then they are therefore morally wrong when not donating organs to other people, an illogical concept that contradicts Singer’s greater moral evil rule. While Singer may be able to rebut the objection points, he cannot deny the foundation of the objection, therefore rendering his argument invalid. One of the arguments that leads Singer…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He does this first by presenting a drowning child situation that attempts to convince people to agree with his main moral principle that people are morally obligated to prevent bad things from happening that would not result in a loss of something of equal moral value. Singer claims that should a person agree that one is morally obligated to save a drowning child with the cost of dirtying their clothes, they therefore must also agree to donate their surplus of money until they themselves are in poverty, because doing so would not risk anything of equal moral value. Contrary to Singer’s argument, one might still be able to agree with his main moral principle without donating all of their money to help prevent poverty. It follows logically this main moral principle is equally applicable to other issues such as the environment, as the degradation of the environment is another bad thing that is preventable to the same extent as poverty. With critical analyzes of Singer’s argument, it may be concluded that one may consistently agree with the initial premises of Singer’s argument without agreement to his conclusion of morally obligatory…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer advocates that an individual practice marginal utility, which is when the person giving reaches the same material level as the person who is receiving the charity (236). His claim for this follows that it would alleviate the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Providing which rights are commonly used in many countries to identify the poor. The article also provides the definition that UNICEF uses to define child poverty which covers their development, family’s income and the fact that child poverty needs to be viewed different from poverty in general. The authors state that “according to the UNICEF, over half of the children in the developing world live in poverty” (Minujin, Delamonica, Davidziuk, Gonzalez, 2006, P.481), this shows how child poverty is not only a problem in third world countries. There are various points made within this article which is relevant to child poverty, touching on the lack of knowledge on issues surrounding child poverty. Lack of knowledge makes it difficult for social policies to include everything needed to reduce child poverty.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Billions Cursed by Poverty In this world, there are more than a billion people who are currently living below the poverty line; millions of stories are recorded which manifest ethos, pathos and logos. Poverty is the main cause in this world which is snatching the lives of billions of people. Thus why is poverty extremely atrocious and monstrous? The answer lies in our tiny little brains.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does that have any meaning, though, if the end result - people’s lives being saved - is the same? Like mentioned prior, some of the people in the world have no other option. Whether it is a morally correct thing for one to donate when considering their motives, is not something that would cross the minds of those who are living in extreme poverty where those around them are dying and they are simply waiting their turn. Singer states that philanthropists such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are donating large sums of money towards solutions to global poverty, not due to motivations of personal divine salvation, but rather more likely out of a sense of duty. So the motivations of those who donate should simply be to better the state of his fellow man, but as well as if there were a government mandated requirement to donate then that would remove the question of if it 's their personal motives or not out of the question…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The underlying goal of philosophy is to help humans seek the ultimate truth to the questions that orbit their knowledge for the meaning of existence. One question that many philosophers are challenging themselves to answer would be that of just how far individuals should go in order to provide relief for those who are suffering from poverty. After attaining a degree in bioethics, a professor by the name of Peter Singer recently ventured to provide the world with an answer to the question that had been protruding the minds of many philosophers. Singer claims, “The formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Although Singer’s argument proposes an idea that could be beneficial towards…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Poverty is an issue that people face in every country of the world. Many people are living in poverty today and unable to live within the same standards as others members of their same society, simply due to differences in their financial capabilities. This is an issue for individuals, as well as an issue between countries, having some countries striving with wealth, while other countries struggle to feed and house their people. A social problem is defined as “a social condition or pattern of behavior that has negative consequences for individuals, our social world, or our physical world” (Guerrero, 2005. 4). This paper was written about the issue poverty because it is an important social problem that affects such a large number of Americans…

    • 1805 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays