Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Silent Majority By Richard Nixon

Improved Essays
When Richard Nixon took office as president of the United States of America in 1969, he was forced into a role where a small decision made would affect the lives of hundreds of thousands of men fighting in a country halfway around the globe, and the fate of a divided country. Following anti-war protests on October 14, 1969, and immediately after taking office, the new president Nixon reaffirms his stance as president of the United States, the leader of the people, through his speech titled “The Great Silent Majority”, one month later on November 3, 1969. The historical background of Nixon’s speech combined with his repeated use of the rhetorical elements, and combined with a more approachable tone, make his speech a powerful one that will resonate …show more content…
He gives Americans a genuine sense of his cause and uses delicate words. Richard Nixon respects himself and America, so he calls on their pride and confidence, because “this defeat in our Nation’s history would result in a collapse of confidence in American leadership” (Nixon 2). Furthermore, Nixon’s highlights Americans’ traits by mentioning that “we Americans are a do-it-yourself people. We are an impatient people. Instead of teaching someone else to do a job, we like to do it ourselves. And this trait has been carried over into our foreign policy” (Nixon 4). He genuinely respects Americans’ ambition and pleads to everyone to use those traits in order to continue fighting in …show more content…
He contends to the fact that even he, an excellent debater, is not able to convince the communists to back down and relays the cold threats directed by them to America. Other immediate consequences would be that “allies would lose confidence in America”, and that “we would lose confidence in ourselves” (Nixon 4). As a great nation, such a retreat would be severely detrimental to its reputation, and would lead to further complications, considering America was still in the midst of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and would allow the Soviet Union to gain some footage in the competition. America is the most powerful nation on earth, and not carrying through with this war would harm America more in the long term than in the short term with some number of deaths. Through his powerful combination of rhetorical elements, Richard Nixon is able to make his point about the Vietnam War, and uses logic and reasoning, along with other factors, to show the Americans his dedication to the war, because he truly believes that it is America’s duty to prevent communism and protect allies not only for diplomacy, but to establish itself as a world power. He therefore stresses, with respect, that the “silent majority” must rise, so that America can continue to carry on and to continue with its

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The presidency of Richard M. Nixon was fraught with turmoil; but despite the madness and chaos that were part of his presidential history, Nixon will go down as one of the most dedicated presidents of our country. At a time that America was in a state of disarray from being involved in three different wars since the beginning of the century, Nixon entered office with Vietnam fully engaged in warfare. His policy for the war was one that held promise; however Nixon’s ability to move forward with the policy became compromised by the politics. The Vietnam War had an impact on both the United States and the presidency of Richard M. Nixon.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech was meant to rally the United States out of neutrality. And it succeeded; American joined the effort to “pursue a global struggle … not for the character of the combat, but for the rightness of the cause and the unity of purpose” that the president had convinced them of (Kaye). FDR uses all the rhetorical appeals to support his pathetic goal. He used ethos to support him in the role of war-time president, logos to illustrate the reasons to end America’s neutral stance and pathos to rally and prepare the American people to support and eventually enter the war. This speech exemplifies one key aspect of presidential rhetoric, a national pep talk. President Roosevelt used this speech to convince the public that war was an obligation, not an option. He turned his policy into fundamental rights. Rather than giving the general public a choice, he states his plan as the only selection. FDR’s speech shows the importance of the president to be able to unify the nation in both times of crisis and in times of peace. Because of FDR’s rhetoric, both in this speech and his famous fireside chats he has become “an icon of national compassion”…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 23, 1952 Richard Nixon, a candidate for vice president, gave his famous “Checkers speech” to persuade the American people and potential voters that he was an innocent family man who would never take bribes. The American populace thought he had received over 18,000 dollars worth of bribes, and for him to save his and Eisenhower’s chances of winning the election he gave a speech with an innocent family man appeal that then shifted to an accusatory voice due to his anger toward the “witch hunts”.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nixon Containment Strategy

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, now, there was evidence to support these concerns and just cause to make an adjustment. As was previously mentioned, public support was declining rapidly, and the Nixon administration knew a change needed to be made. Given the failure of NSC-68, the reasonable response from Nixon and Kissinger was to reverse U.S. policy back towards Kennan’s containment strategy, which would appease the concerns of the public and allow for some sense of order and restraint amongst international powers. The Nixon-Kissinger strategy was positioned around the belief that while the world is bipolar militarily (between the U.S. and Soviet Union), it was becoming increasingly multi-polar politically, where the biggest challenge for the U.S. would be adapting to this new international system (lecture). In Nixon and Kissinger’s opinion, this new international power structure meant that the U.S. needed to change how it interacted with other countries. The U.S. could no longer support their actions based on ideology or perception. Essentially, the internal behavior of other countries or adversaries was no longer important, and powers would be dealt with in terms of foreign policy. . In order to accomplish this task, Nixon and Kissinger realized they needed shift in how the U.S. viewed its interest. Previously, the U.S. had allowed for threats to dictate its behavior and its interests. However, Nixon and Kissinger planned to change the definition of our national interest. Rather than base foreign policy off Soviet threats or commitments to its allies, Nixon and Kissinger wanted U.S. interests to focus solely on what was important to and what directly impacted the United States. In doing so, Nixon and Kissinger hoped to establish a stable international order where all countries would behave in accordance with all legitimate states. To create this equilibrium among states, Nixon and…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nixon’s actions concerning the United States’ foreign policy proved to be beneficial. During his administration, Nixon set out to improve relations with Communist countries. He felt that negotiations with the People’s Republic of China and the Soviet Union would help bring stability to the world. Nixon’s diplomatic interactions with Asian countries show his…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also wants to share his goal for the outcome of war. He tells the Audience that we are fighting to protect South Vietnam because “since 1954 every American president has offered support to the people of South Vietnam” (132). He also claims we are there to show other people outside of South- East Asia that America will be there to help if they are attacked as well. By stating his reasons why he sent the U.S to fight in Vietnam he is appealing to those who believe in loyalty, and also those who believe in zero sum gain. By helping a state like South-Vietnam, who is under communist attack, Johnson shows that a lost to communism is a lost America cannot afford. Johnson is also trying to persuade the audience that the U. S’s presence in Vietnam is necessary, by acknowledging those who do not believe that we have a responsibility there, or believe that our efforts will not gain results. He Counter argues the people that believe this, by stating that the U.S has the right to help fight “for the defense of freedom” (132). He then explicitly tells the audience that the only way for a peaceful settlement is that South Vietnam becomes independent, which he defines as “securely guaranteed and able to shape its own relationship to all others- free from outside interference- tied to no alliance- a military base for no other” (133). This appeals to those who believe that containment is necessary because he states that he will not stop fighting until South Vietnam does not have the threat of communism anymore, while also appealing to those that believe that appeasement never works. Johnson’ s speech intends to inform and persuade the audience why the U.S is in Vietnam, and what his goal for the war…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vietnam War Dbq Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Overall, the Vietnam war was a popular conflict that failed in terms of the defense of S, Vietnam against the communist N. Vietnam, and changed many American’s opinions about the nation’s role in the world and on their lives. The Vietnam War was yet another example of the escalation of the cold war, but his time, American intentions were completely misguided, and the damage done to society was huge. American involvement in Vietnam increased conflict and tension in the U.S. because of the overwhelming unpopularity of the government decisions causing great social unrest and unhappiness especially young people, political corruption in the Johnson and Nixon administrations, and economic mismanagement of the war effort vs. domestic programs.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay Nixon’s Flawed Search for Peace by Melvin Small, he criticizes some of Richard Nixon’s Vietnam policies. Small had a rather bitter view of Richard Nixon suggesting some interesting points about how his policies and procedures did not follow through in the correct way. When Nixon first came in to office he wanted to end the Vietnam war and bring our troops home. Doing this would be difficult for him because he wanted to portray to the American people that we won the war, even though that would be very hard to do considering you were having more troops being sent home every day. Nixon was “convinced that how we end this war will determine the future of the U.S. in the world.” Small really hits the nail on the head describing how…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The new president identified the rise of these new individualistic attitudes as being one of the nation’s core developing issues, and implied that a renewed selflessness would improve its current situation. He avowed, “we can not merely take but we must give as well; that if we are to go forward, we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective” (Roosevelt par. 17). FDR used action stimulation to demand the unification of the country; he described that, without it, Americans would not see their nation thrive. His employment of this function was effective, as the military analogy, which furthered his call for action, allowed them to feel as though they could have a direct impact on the improvement of the nation’s integrity. Furthermore, FDR implied that he would not be a valuable leader without the unity and self-sacrifice of his fellow people. This allowed him to provide his audience with a sense of importance and reveal his…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many intellectuals and Americans saw the Vietnam War as damaging to American society and, unlike WWII, lead to people questioning America’s role in the world and whether the country had any right to intervene. Noam Chomsky in his 1969 book American Power and the New Mandarins directly negates the idea of American intervention. Chomsky links the Civil Rights struggle in America with the Vietnamese people in the statement “racism and exploitation at home can be linked with the struggle to remove the heavy Yankee boot from the necks of oppressed people throughout the world”. Whereas intellectuals during WWII encouraged United States to join a war, the vivid imagery of “heavy Yankee boot” and “necks of oppressed people” when concerning the Vietnam War shows how American influence in other parts of the world was now resented by not only people from these oppressed countries, but by Americans themselves. As well as this, the use of this statement implies the United States as forcing people to comply with American input, rather than it being welcomed as seen in WWII, while also addressing the suffering of African American’s in America’s own nation. Historians M. Isserman and M. Kazin argue that the war “proved to be the most…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nixon Dbq Analysis

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ` The United States was on the verge of destruction starting from 1968 when Richard Nixon became president till 1974 when he resigned. American antiwar protests and economic decline were the least of the miseries; the Vietnam War and its threat of worldwide communism terrified Americans, people looked to their president and his administration to solve all of the looming dilemmas. The previous presidents left Nixon with a jumble of international problems. Starting with Truman, Americans were invested into the fight against communism, defending South Vietnam from their Northern communist counterparts, going into the Cold War to beat the USSR and refusing the acknowledge The People’s Republic of China as modern day China, through Nixon communism…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dramatic pentadic criticism allows us to define what types of situations are effective in enabling the communicator to maintain or regain their public image (Griffin, 305). That is, as Nixon speaks, he indicates how he perceives the world. Results from this analysis reveal what he regarded as the appropriate response, and how the rhetorical choices made in his speech affected the audience’s…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nixon 1970 Dbq

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between 1968 and 1974, the United States faced many international and domestic challenges and the Nixon administration responded to them both positively and negatively. Nixon claimed that it was time for new leadership within America and promised to restore law and order within American cities (Doc A). Not only would Nixon restore law and order, he also claimed that he would bring peace within international relations. However, instead of restoring law and order and bringing peace, Nixon done the complete opposite, destroying the nation’s trust.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nixon’s ‘Peace with Honor’ significance in the Vietnam war can show either the justification or discrediting of the Americans involvement in the war. Due to the events which occurred, the United States involve itself within a war with smaller nations attempting to stop the spread of communism due to the belief of the domino theory would occur if South Vietnam was to become…

    • 1765 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    . By 1972, when President Richard Nixon was running for reelection, the United States had been embroiled in the Vietnam War for 17 years and deeply divided internally as a result. Re-election insecurity and positioned in a war that hurt our nation economically and emotionally, Nixon was aware of the stress put on him and high expectations he would have to live up to, however: “Nixon was among those who stopped bothering. Just as the initial support for the reforms waned, so Nixon’s enthusiasm disappeared. The war in Vietnam was proving to be far more intractable than he hoped and he was forced to devote more and more of his attention to the effort to end it” . In his first term as president, Nixon promised the American public that he would reduce U.S. troop levels in Vietnam. He pursued a plan he called "Vietnamization," whereby the U.S. would gradually withdraw from the war, leaving the South Vietnamese army to shoulder the bulk of the fighting. Despite his plan that would gradually end the war, the number of troops in Vietnam stayed high and the Nixon administration entered into war with Vietnam 's neighboring countries of Cambodia and Laos. The grand amount of protests, specifically ones in Kent State, achieved national and international prominence and illustrated the…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays