Technology for the Future: Rhetorical Analysis of Dr.Honey’s
“Technology Has Improved Education” Technological advances is the key to improving the intellectual minds of students, around the world. One visionary that believes in this is Doctor Margaret Honey. She is the author of Technology Has Improved Education, an article published with the sole purpose of convincing congress to vote for the use of technology, to excel everyday learning. Not only does Dr.Honey make her voice heard with the overall summary of her article, but also through her dashing credentials and background, her ability to appeal to a neutral crowd, the way she uses reason to back all of her claims, and even her ability to rule out the opposition, make her argument …show more content…
Andrew LeFevre wrote an article called Technology Alone Has Not Improved Education. In this article, he explains the opposition of technology being a home run, when it comes to education. He does this first by stating that the costs of technology are very great and that school systems can overspend money on technology, and have less to spend on necessities. LeFevre also claims that the inconsistencies of the teachers operating the technology and the misuse of it can be detrimental to learning. However, Dr.Honey does an excellent job of squashing the argument of her opposition. In her article is a composed list on how to make technology effective within the classroom. Within this list, she explains how everyone must work together in order for technology to help in the classroom, and talks about how the cost of technology is necessary to better our future. After the list are facts that back of the contents of the list. Honey does a terrific job of busting all the opposition she could have currently, or even in the future. (LeFevre) Doctor Margaret Honey does an outstanding job of persuading her audience to the benefits that technology has on learning. Her views are clearly stated in detail and are followed up with logical reasoning. The tones she uses and her ability to rule out the opposition all while still managing to keep her passage following logos is impeccable. Congress will have an easy decision on whether or not to bring more technology into classrooms. This is all thanks to Doctor Margaret Honey and her ability to establish change through
“Technology Has Improved Education” Technological advances is the key to improving the intellectual minds of students, around the world. One visionary that believes in this is Doctor Margaret Honey. She is the author of Technology Has Improved Education, an article published with the sole purpose of convincing congress to vote for the use of technology, to excel everyday learning. Not only does Dr.Honey make her voice heard with the overall summary of her article, but also through her dashing credentials and background, her ability to appeal to a neutral crowd, the way she uses reason to back all of her claims, and even her ability to rule out the opposition, make her argument …show more content…
Andrew LeFevre wrote an article called Technology Alone Has Not Improved Education. In this article, he explains the opposition of technology being a home run, when it comes to education. He does this first by stating that the costs of technology are very great and that school systems can overspend money on technology, and have less to spend on necessities. LeFevre also claims that the inconsistencies of the teachers operating the technology and the misuse of it can be detrimental to learning. However, Dr.Honey does an excellent job of squashing the argument of her opposition. In her article is a composed list on how to make technology effective within the classroom. Within this list, she explains how everyone must work together in order for technology to help in the classroom, and talks about how the cost of technology is necessary to better our future. After the list are facts that back of the contents of the list. Honey does a terrific job of busting all the opposition she could have currently, or even in the future. (LeFevre) Doctor Margaret Honey does an outstanding job of persuading her audience to the benefits that technology has on learning. Her views are clearly stated in detail and are followed up with logical reasoning. The tones she uses and her ability to rule out the opposition all while still managing to keep her passage following logos is impeccable. Congress will have an easy decision on whether or not to bring more technology into classrooms. This is all thanks to Doctor Margaret Honey and her ability to establish change through