Say you are Shakespeare, and you get popular and like how he was, you would wanna be as popular as any other course a college student would have to take, right? Of course you would! Michael Mack wrote a speech to Christian freshman that are just starting college, and is trying to tell them that learning Shakespeare will help you find your heart, but not only your heart, but once you learn his writing, you can officially mark yourself as an educated person! Even though you can say you’re smart, and you found your heart, it is truly one of the more important classes you can take. Mack produced an effective argument that tells us although it’s difficult to understand Shakespeare, it is worth the effort. Since he is writing to Christian college freshmen, he uses ethos and hyperboles.
First of all, the device that Mack uses to advance his argument is his use of ethos. Mack produces an effective argument that uses ethos, which he quotes the …show more content…
Like instead of using “bowling buddies,” he could have said, “..My online friends.” He uses bowling buddies on lines (54), and it reads “Besides, what would my bowling buddies say?” He really didn’t have to use such an old term that would of been used 30+ years ago, when he could of used something for the 21st century, like, “Besides, what would all of my online friends think about me after this?”
To conclude, Mack produced an effective argument that tells us although it’s difficult to understand Shakespeare, it is worth the effort, through his uses of ethos and hyperboles. So what you would say, Shakespeare is not the easiest topic to learn, and if people would just push themselves to learn it, they might become “an educated person,” and being able to say, “Hey! I actually understand Shakespeare, which not everyone can learn. Shakespeare has been one the world's biggest mystery, and what would happen if you were to be the one to figure it
First of all, the device that Mack uses to advance his argument is his use of ethos. Mack produces an effective argument that uses ethos, which he quotes the …show more content…
Like instead of using “bowling buddies,” he could have said, “..My online friends.” He uses bowling buddies on lines (54), and it reads “Besides, what would my bowling buddies say?” He really didn’t have to use such an old term that would of been used 30+ years ago, when he could of used something for the 21st century, like, “Besides, what would all of my online friends think about me after this?”
To conclude, Mack produced an effective argument that tells us although it’s difficult to understand Shakespeare, it is worth the effort, through his uses of ethos and hyperboles. So what you would say, Shakespeare is not the easiest topic to learn, and if people would just push themselves to learn it, they might become “an educated person,” and being able to say, “Hey! I actually understand Shakespeare, which not everyone can learn. Shakespeare has been one the world's biggest mystery, and what would happen if you were to be the one to figure it