Rhetorical Analysis Of Hayden Watters '

Streaming your life via Facebook or other social media has become a new trend. People consider it as a brand new approach to share your significant moment with others. However, it could have brought the shortcomings along with using this new convention. Haydn Watters proposes a tough question to the individuals who are currently obsessed with live stream technology. Indeed, he asks what is the bottom line of utilizing such new convention. In the article, Hayden Watters mentions the places that are not allowed to stream your life. Moreover, it has stroke several controversial issue on the internet as some people against it. The proof of evidence are well organized to support the thesis and appears to be specifically targeted on the theme. It …show more content…
The sub-heading of the article “where is it appropriate to broadcast to the world?” is a direct use of the rhetorical question, which catches reader’s attention at the first place. Not only that, the question has been debated through different perspectives as the author continues providing several evidence. Consequently, readers would have picked either side after considering all those aspects. The use of the rhetorical question in this case greatly points out the issue that author raises, meanwhile the author does not favour either way. Hayden Watters uses data “more than 200,000 people” to illustrate the impact that this live stream video has on the internet. Those numerous viewers had witnessed the birth of the baby through the whole time, whereas the medical staff had no idea what was going on. Through the statistics, one perceives how these viewers could have debate and argue for either perspective. That is why the author builds comprehensive thesis to cover and conclude the opposite viewpoints, which they have toward live stream technology. In addition, an analogy is being effectively used as a comparison of restraining live stream with maintaining anti-paparazzo. Watters gets this response from a spokesman, Tony Bitonti. He briefly interprets the situation as the policies in the casino regarding anti-paparazzo. This is definitely a highlight from the article, an analogy is generally two essentially different objects, yet have at least one in common. Bitonti refers to the provincial privacy law, which implies the difficulty of practicing the law in real life. Right after Bitonti’s opinion on the live streaming, the author contrasts with the parents who strongly agree to use live stream to see their kids. The word “ transparency ” reveals the main purpose of these parents wanting to have the camera equipped in