Rhetorical Analysis Of Get It Right

Author Miller essay entitled Get It Right: Privatize Executions is satire piece that question the methods and principle used on criminals on death row. Author Miller is encouraging a feeling of shame and reckless toward the audience. Execution of criminals is a controversial topic and instead of taking a serious position, Miller has decided laugh at the issue, while analyzing key flaws within executions. For instance, millers see the execution as boxing match where the audience can take bets, and lastly Author Mill see idea more as reward then punished. Capital punishment is serious defense but to Author it’s more like box match, where the audience is able to take bets. Boxing matching is considered a popular sport within many culture; so how does death row compare to boxing then? Author Miller see capital punishment as competitive sport, the reason are: you can charge for it, and lastly it follows ritual that all can love. …show more content…
The income form the spectacle could be distributed to the prison that fed and housed him or to a trust fund for prisoner rehabilitation and his own family and/or girlfriend as he himself chose. The condemned would of course get a percentage of the gate, to be negotiated by his agent or a promoter, if he so desired. The take would, without question, be sizable, considering the immense number of Americans in favor of capital punishment. A $200 to $300 ring side seat would not be excessive, with bleaches going for, say 25” (Miller, 297). This specific example clearly illustrates Miller view on capital punishment. This example also illustrates Miller Satire, mocking humor how adaptable capital punishment can be in relationship to