Rhetorical Analysis Of End The Gun Epidemic In America

Improved Essays
Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Gun control in America has always been an issue. With problems coming up such as school shootings, teens getting their hands on their parents’ guns, and kids accidentally shooting themselves, people want laws set forward to limit the use of guns. In “End the Gun Epidemic in America,” The Editorial Board talks about how they want stricter gun laws because no one really needs to own a gun. The Editorial Board believes there should be stricter gun laws in the United States because they think it’s too easy to get your hand on a gun and possibly injure someone. Their use of pathos throughout the article makes the audience want there to be stricter gun laws, but the use of logos and ethos is weak. The argument in “End
…show more content…
These people feel the only way they can feel safe is to buy a gun, which is intended to hurt people. “It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). Here is a sign of pathos in the article. The Editorial Board is trying to make you aware of the dangers of buying and using a gun. That when you buy a gun, you’re either going to be hurting yourself or another person. The Board also makes note of how officials try to distract the public with “arguments about the word terrorism,” (End the Gun Epidemic in America), but aren’t calling the shooting sprees and other gun shootings terrorism. Pathos was used well here because terrorism is always going to be an emotional and frightening topic to think or talk about. Especially since it’s happening in your own country but no one wants to shed light to the idea that mass shootings are related to terrorism. Pathos was effective because the argument to stricter gun laws provoked fear and emotions by shedding light on the real reason to buy a …show more content…
The United Kingdom also has strict gun laws and has the lowest crime rate. “They point out that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France England, and Norway that have strict gun laws. Yes, they did. But at least those countries are trying. The United States is not.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). The argument they had used to retaliate at those facts were weak. By saying, “... at least those countries are trying,” means they’re not really trying hard enough. E specially if killers are getting their hands on guns. Having gun control in those countries and people are still getting guns makes you want to fear for your life. The use of logos was weak here because if it had failed in those countries, what makes them think gun control laws will be obeyed here in the United States. Their facts show that even though those countries in Europe had stricter gun laws, determined killers still managed to get their hands on weapons. These facts show gun control in America would end up the same as it did in France, England, and Norway, ineffective. The use of logos was ineffective because it was proven killers still had access to weapons in countries with strict gun laws. Making it show the reader of the article would not have the same viewpoint as The Editorial

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Argument Essay

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun control has become a very big problem with people in the United States, with all the reasoning on why the government are putting tighter laws on guns. Some people have made poor choices with guns and it has made the government start to think on how they can make it to where there is more control over guns without having to take guns away completely. Even though some people believe that guns should go away completely and some believe that there should be no gun control whatsoever. The second amendment keeps the government from taking away guns completely because people have the right to bear arms. There are many arguments against gun control because people believe they shouldn’t be punished because of choices other people are making with…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can violate the 2nd amendment, which is of course “right to bear arms.” There has been so much in the media about gun control. The majority of the media does not show what concealed and carry is capable of in a positive way, but only the negative. People believe gun control is there to have their guns seized. There are more than enough restrictions on guns, so there for the majority of people that can have guns are safe to be around. This proven claim shows my thesis is correct by having restrictions on guns, is not stopping criminals from obtaining illegal guns, but only making it more difficult for innocent, clean slate civilians to possess…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Activist in favor of gun control believe that with gun control being enacted that the United States would not only be better off but safer as well. The other party who disbelieve in the need for gun control believe that with it the country will only grow more corrupt considering the facts that the states that have had gun constraints have grown more violent prove their point. Gun control would keep guns out of the United States for a short period after it would be enacted, but as soon as they are smuggled into the United States all of the citizens who had previously given up their arms now have no guns to defend themselves against robbers, muggers, or whoever it might be that threatens their lives. In order to keep guns better under control without taking away guns from citizens is by enforcing security in places like schools and for the government to keep track of who is mentally unstable and to make sure that there is no chance what so ever for them to get in reach of a…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    They obtain them illegally and cause harm to the people around them. This was not the original purpose for guns, guns were used to protect what people want to protect. Banning guns would not reduce the crime rate in America, since criminals and psychos obtain weapons illegally anyway, all the government would be doing is preventing citizens from getting guns to protect themselves. If the government decides to ban guns, they…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They claim that even if guns weren’t around, people will still find other ways to cause harm to another individual. It doesn’t change the fact that a life can still be taken through the use of another type of weapon or due to the carelessness of one person. There are still other high crime scenarios that are killing people. One may state, if citizens think that getting rid of guns will change the world for the better then those are the same individuals that are in fact brainwashing the public. “The anti-gun forces also tell women that it’s dangerous to carry a gun and try to use it against an attack, because, they say, the attacker is likely to seize the gun and turn it against the woman” (Harris 2).…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People think that the National Rifle Association (NRA) promotes what happens, instead the NRA promotes owning guns for protection. Mass shootings that we have seen, or think we’ve seen, are not caused by mentally sane people. Mentally unstable people are the ones who have caused so much havoc within the last few years. If someone is that unstable that they think going out and killing people for fun is ok, they should not be allowed to live anymore. People want to blame an organization, or come up with an excuse for other people 's actions.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that the term gun is badly used everyone is saying that guns are being taken away that’s not what they are trying to do with gun control. The government is using gun control to make it harder for criminals to get ahold of guns. Also it will be a bad thing because if you have a record for the state you will not be able to have your guns without going through a legal process to get the record taken away. It is for these reasons that I am against these and also because America should be able to protect themselves from criminals that do abuse firearms. Americans were given the right to bear arms by the founding fathers, it isn’t right that the government can just make a law to take away those rights but also I believe it can be a good thing to though.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays